<![CDATA[Excuses.....Excuses....]]>http://kane.phpwebhosting.com/~niggapino/media/hot_steaming_shit_rx7.wmv

sometimes people just cant accept defeat 😄

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/1037/excuses.....excuses....RSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 18:22:48 GMTThu, 23 Dec 2004 01:35:37 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Excuses.....Excuses.... on Sun, 26 Dec 2004 04:34:49 GMT]]>i'd try a search for turbo, mustang, camaro, lt1, etc... or fastest 1/4 street tires mustang, something like that

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/18868https://fargostreet.com/post/18868Sun, 26 Dec 2004 04:34:49 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Excuses.....Excuses.... on Sun, 26 Dec 2004 02:24:18 GMT]]>

out there wrote:
i just remember seeing a thing on a site that was boasting of the new fastest 1/4 time on street tires, and it was a mustang that weighed in at about 3300lbs, 7.92
what website???

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/18812https://fargostreet.com/post/18812Sun, 26 Dec 2004 02:24:18 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Excuses.....Excuses.... on Sun, 26 Dec 2004 00:53:44 GMT]]>i just remember seeing a thing on a site that was boasting of the new fastest 1/4 time on street tires, and it was a mustang that weighed in at about 3300lbs, 7.92

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/18799https://fargostreet.com/post/18799Sun, 26 Dec 2004 00:53:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Excuses.....Excuses.... on Sat, 25 Dec 2004 21:02:11 GMT]]>

out there wrote:
gt500? do you mean the mustang? if that's what you're referring to, i read about that in some magazine a couple months ago... and saw it on the website for a company devoted to turbo v8s
the 1967 shelby mustang GT 500 elanor replica do u remeber the website name??

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/18768https://fargostreet.com/post/18768Sat, 25 Dec 2004 21:02:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Excuses.....Excuses.... on Sat, 25 Dec 2004 20:11:10 GMT]]>gt500? do you mean the mustang? if that's what you're referring to, i read about that in some magazine a couple months ago... and saw it on the website for a company devoted to turbo v8s

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/18760https://fargostreet.com/post/18760Sat, 25 Dec 2004 20:11:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Excuses.....Excuses.... on Thu, 23 Dec 2004 21:47:10 GMT]]>

My NOva wrote:
he had the time slip posted and the video ill look for the video but it hit 7.93 on low pros 😄
lets see it..

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/18194https://fargostreet.com/post/18194Thu, 23 Dec 2004 21:47:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Excuses.....Excuses.... on Thu, 23 Dec 2004 21:46:22 GMT]]>

spoolude wrote:
fuck the part about gt500 running the 1/4 mile in 8 secs on low pros. once the turbos spool it would just spin.
he had the time slip posted and the video ill look for the video but it hit 7.93 on low pros 😄

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/18193https://fargostreet.com/post/18193Thu, 23 Dec 2004 21:46:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Excuses.....Excuses.... on Thu, 23 Dec 2004 21:45:16 GMT]]>

My NOva wrote:
6 cyl. + turbo = dave @ 9.46
what year 5.0 why not get yourself a 1967 yenko camaro? 427 big block pushing 435 rwhp and 670 wtq talk about drool I saw a set up on a replica of elanor "1967 FORD MUSTANG SHELBY GT500" off gone in sixty seconds
with a 427 twin turbo set up pushing over a 1000 rwhp ran the 1/4 mile this car at 7.93 on lowprofile tires not slicks...this car was on ebay reserve not met over 200,000.00
fuck the part about gt500 running the 1/4 mile in 8 secs on low pros. once the turbos spool it would just spin.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/18192https://fargostreet.com/post/18192Thu, 23 Dec 2004 21:45:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Excuses.....Excuses.... on Thu, 23 Dec 2004 20:00:21 GMT]]>

-GSX-Falcon wrote:
Did you see the Full Throttle Ep where they raced the Vader cars? (GNs)

Vid?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/18182https://fargostreet.com/post/18182Thu, 23 Dec 2004 20:00:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Excuses.....Excuses.... on Thu, 23 Dec 2004 18:09:50 GMT]]>i saw it that was pimp

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/18163https://fargostreet.com/post/18163Thu, 23 Dec 2004 18:09:50 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Excuses.....Excuses.... on Thu, 23 Dec 2004 17:18:18 GMT]]>Did you see the Full Throttle Ep where they raced the Vader cars? (GNs)

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/18154https://fargostreet.com/post/18154Thu, 23 Dec 2004 17:18:18 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Excuses.....Excuses.... on Thu, 23 Dec 2004 08:09:40 GMT]]>GNX = also sexy as hell in my book but not meant for a college student.

I went with a DSM because of the AWD and I really would care because of the abuse it would take plus it could handle the snow and all. I have seen a few GNX's at the track and they are so beautiful. Well just to my eye but to any other person they are just another Regal. I really wish they would have kept up on those cars.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/18132https://fargostreet.com/post/18132Thu, 23 Dec 2004 08:09:40 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Excuses.....Excuses.... on Thu, 23 Dec 2004 08:05:10 GMT]]>

Bad93ex wrote:
I personally love going to the track and listening to the rumble of a big block especially running on alcohol. My next car is definitely going to have a LS1 or a built 5.0 because there is no replacement for displacement. Yeah you can turbo a 4 cyl. but what happens when you turbo a 6 or 8 cyl?

LS1 = Sexy in my book
6 cyl. + turbo = dave @ 9.46
what year 5.0 why not get yourself a 1967 yenko camaro? 427 big block pushing 435 rwhp and 670 wtq talk about drool I saw a set up on a replica of elanor "1967 FORD MUSTANG SHELBY GT500" off gone in sixty seconds
with a 427 twin turbo set up pushing over a 1000 rwhp ran the 1/4 mile this car at 7.93 on lowprofile tires not slicks...this car was on ebay reserve not met over 200,000.00

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/18130https://fargostreet.com/post/18130Thu, 23 Dec 2004 08:05:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Excuses.....Excuses.... on Thu, 23 Dec 2004 07:58:47 GMT]]>I personally love going to the track and listening to the rumble of a big block especially running on alcohol. My next car is definitely going to have a LS1 or a built 5.0 because there is no replacement for displacement. Yeah you can turbo a 4 cyl. but what happens when you turbo a 6 or 8 cyl?

LS1 = Sexy in my book

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/18126https://fargostreet.com/post/18126Thu, 23 Dec 2004 07:58:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Excuses.....Excuses.... on Thu, 23 Dec 2004 06:19:10 GMT]]>Classic V-8's or just "american muscle" may not be my thing...but sometimes you still just gotta have some respect for it...i mean even i have a few classic high performance cars i wouldnt mind owning....but im all about the 4 cylinders!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/18110https://fargostreet.com/post/18110Thu, 23 Dec 2004 06:19:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Excuses.....Excuses.... on Thu, 23 Dec 2004 06:11:10 GMT]]>I like V8's mainly for the fact that i LOVE the deep rumble they make, i personally think the noise of a V8 with a kickass exhaust system is unbeatable. Racewise, yeah 4's and 6's can beat, tie, and lose to a V8, its all in how its tuned. To each his own. If you're happy with your car thats all that should matter.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/18108https://fargostreet.com/post/18108Thu, 23 Dec 2004 06:11:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Excuses.....Excuses.... on Thu, 23 Dec 2004 05:40:03 GMT]]>

Pony_Racer wrote:
it didnt sound stock due to the EXHAUST(aftermarket)!!! lol...and another reason why that 7 lost could be due to the driver as well...having a faster car doesnt guarntee a win. You gotta know how to drive it as well 😄
that stang is not stock by any means and im a meat head according to flowcus v-8s rock he atleast has it camed headers new exaust "no cats" maybe a new high rise intake? and as for trucks with dual exaust and new air filter they need to stop there all high on crack that they made the other night....lOL u know about that dont u flowcus??? that rx-7 should have beat that mustang, rx-7 needs a better driver

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/18102https://fargostreet.com/post/18102Thu, 23 Dec 2004 05:40:03 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Excuses.....Excuses.... on Thu, 23 Dec 2004 04:39:42 GMT]]>I'm with flowcus on people with trucks. Not to say a truck can't be fast but 9 times outta 10 it's some guy with straight pipes thinking they really got something goin. Meanwhile their driving something setup for towing 😕

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/18089https://fargostreet.com/post/18089Thu, 23 Dec 2004 04:39:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Excuses.....Excuses.... on Thu, 23 Dec 2004 04:22:34 GMT]]>it didnt sound stock due to the EXHAUST(aftermarket)!!! lol...and another reason why that 7 lost could be due to the driver as well...having a faster car doesnt guarntee a win. You gotta know how to drive it as well 😄

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/18084https://fargostreet.com/post/18084Thu, 23 Dec 2004 04:22:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Excuses.....Excuses.... on Thu, 23 Dec 2004 04:21:21 GMT]]>Actually as far as I know a car wont spit flames unless its running to rich... or lots of mods. A car has to be pushing a ton of fuel for it to allow fuel to blow by the pistons and exit through the exhaust.... then the extreamly hot exhaust tip ignites the fuel and shoots flames.

Someone correct me if im wrong.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/18083https://fargostreet.com/post/18083Thu, 23 Dec 2004 04:21:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Excuses.....Excuses.... on Thu, 23 Dec 2004 04:19:46 GMT]]>first of all that mustang didnt sound stock! second they (the editors)of this gay vid can say whatever the hell they want about this and that who knows the truth?
i have owned 13 rx7 all 1st and 2nd gens.....rotarys with that was a 13b twin turbo.. runs 13.8 to 14.2 in the 1320 depends on were you look... would destroy a stock 5liter mustang....my all motor rx7s will beat a stock fox body. So i call bullshit on this vid

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/18082https://fargostreet.com/post/18082Thu, 23 Dec 2004 04:19:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Excuses.....Excuses.... on Thu, 23 Dec 2004 04:09:48 GMT]]>well it has exhaust eheh :D...as far as more than that not too sure. and as far as the flames coming out thats just due to very little back pressure coming out of the exaust thats just usaully do to no cats.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/18080https://fargostreet.com/post/18080Thu, 23 Dec 2004 04:09:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Excuses.....Excuses.... on Thu, 23 Dec 2004 04:04:47 GMT]]>Well in my opinion, a "Stock" (like me) 85 gt mustang usually won't spit flames at top end of 3/4th gear. And rx-7's are all top end, straight props to the 5.0. it's damn quick no doubt, but it's not stock 😉

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/18078https://fargostreet.com/post/18078Thu, 23 Dec 2004 04:04:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Excuses.....Excuses.... on Thu, 23 Dec 2004 04:00:47 GMT]]>or untold mods under the hood somewhere...who knows :D...either that or that dude did not know how to drive/tune that thing.(rx-7)

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/18077https://fargostreet.com/post/18077Thu, 23 Dec 2004 04:00:47 GMT