<![CDATA[test pipe or no]]>hey im replacing the catty and goin test pipe. you guys have a word on that?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/104/test-pipe-or-noRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 15:30:33 GMTMon, 10 May 2004 03:44:35 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to test pipe or no on Wed, 12 May 2004 23:12:52 GMT]]>ummm....wrong "cat" there buddy :lol:

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/798https://fargostreet.com/post/798Wed, 12 May 2004 23:12:52 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to test pipe or no on Wed, 12 May 2004 22:33:35 GMT]]>all this talk about pussy is gettin me horny!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/795https://fargostreet.com/post/795Wed, 12 May 2004 22:33:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to test pipe or no on Tue, 11 May 2004 21:59:04 GMT]]>..lol whatever lets you sleep at night

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/775https://fargostreet.com/post/775Tue, 11 May 2004 21:59:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to test pipe or no on Tue, 11 May 2004 04:58:49 GMT]]>When i had my custom cat back made the shop had a "high flow cat" for 60 bones or so. He also had a "real" "high flow cat" wich ended up costing me 120 bones.

I am positive i have a good high flow cat. I would not want to waste my money on some BS cat.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/757https://fargostreet.com/post/757Tue, 11 May 2004 04:58:49 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to test pipe or no on Tue, 11 May 2004 04:11:52 GMT]]>you need backpressure for lowend torque...taking the cat out dramatically reduces backpressure...

atleast with high flow you have some backpressure and you will still most likely have "higher" flow at the top end...i say that in quotes because some "high flow" can be jokes....

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/753https://fargostreet.com/post/753Tue, 11 May 2004 04:11:52 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to test pipe or no on Tue, 11 May 2004 04:06:42 GMT]]>Interesting..,,?? I have never heard of loseing low end from taking the cat out.

Im glad i went high flow.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/752https://fargostreet.com/post/752Tue, 11 May 2004 04:06:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to test pipe or no on Mon, 10 May 2004 12:45:07 GMT]]>Yeah,that basically what I said too. I didn't look at his sig to see if he was running turbos or not, so I gave the broad range answer.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/717https://fargostreet.com/post/717Mon, 10 May 2004 12:45:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to test pipe or no on Mon, 10 May 2004 04:11:51 GMT]]>Yup... taking out the Cat w/o turbo -> loss of power

atleast from what ive read

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/702https://fargostreet.com/post/702Mon, 10 May 2004 04:11:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to test pipe or no on Mon, 10 May 2004 04:11:50 GMT]]>id say keep that cat especially with pretty open exhaust...your goin to murder whatever lowend power that little gsr had...if you get a turbo get big exhaust and no cat...but for now you should keep that on there esp on a 1.8liter

my .02

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/701https://fargostreet.com/post/701Mon, 10 May 2004 04:11:50 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to test pipe or no on Mon, 10 May 2004 03:57:27 GMT]]>I say remove it, ESPECIALLY if you have a turbo, I have heard of instances where pulling the cat can actually lower your torque due to lack of back pressure so you may want to think about that as well before proceding with this mod. The reason I say go for it on a turbo is because the turbo itself causes some backpressure, but you want that exhaust gas gone ASAP from the hot side of the turbo to get your power up.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/697https://fargostreet.com/post/697Mon, 10 May 2004 03:57:27 GMT