<![CDATA[Latest Dyno run]]>1100+ vid on Dyno

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/11963/latest-dyno-runRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 03:35:40 GMTMon, 24 Sep 2007 01:41:12 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Latest Dyno run on Tue, 23 Oct 2007 02:25:03 GMT]]>i see
i knew E85 needed more fuel....did not realize thst much more.

Monty

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/180552https://fargostreet.com/post/180552Tue, 23 Oct 2007 02:25:03 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Latest Dyno run on Mon, 22 Oct 2007 07:10:09 GMT]]>

KA-T_240;191188 wrote:
So..... How many GPM of fuel are being pumped?

Dave's is rated at about 200 gallons per hour, mine is rated at about 840 Lbs/hour or 124 glns/hour. With each connected separately they each lost pressure at about the same time. Had to add a new return port on the tank and removed fitting where the old return was installed and hooked Dave's into there. Looks sorta funny with 2 -10's up front..
It will be at Straight Line Detailing/Straight Line Specialties later this week for a good cleaning if anyone wants to take a look. NO TOUCHING, it is a ticking time bomb right now:eek:

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/180410https://fargostreet.com/post/180410Mon, 22 Oct 2007 07:10:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Latest Dyno run on Mon, 22 Oct 2007 04:25:31 GMT]]>So..... How many GPM of fuel are being pumped?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/180396https://fargostreet.com/post/180396Mon, 22 Oct 2007 04:25:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Latest Dyno run on Mon, 22 Oct 2007 04:16:12 GMT]]>Bill runs E85, so he needs about 30% more fuel than if he were using gasoline. He was out of fuel pump. He put on my Weldon and that still wasn't enough. Now he has his pump and my Weldon both running in parallel.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/180394https://fargostreet.com/post/180394Mon, 22 Oct 2007 04:16:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Latest Dyno run on Mon, 22 Oct 2007 01:44:02 GMT]]>alot as in more than the 2jz you, Matt or that GS300 run? or similar?

as i remember Matt talking about running 3 fuel pumps to supply enough fuel for his. at least i think he said 3. mayb it was the GS300 that ran 3.

Monty

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/180367https://fargostreet.com/post/180367Mon, 22 Oct 2007 01:44:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Latest Dyno run on Mon, 22 Oct 2007 01:33:08 GMT]]>what was up?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/180360https://fargostreet.com/post/180360Mon, 22 Oct 2007 01:33:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Latest Dyno run on Mon, 22 Oct 2007 01:04:55 GMT]]>Fuel problem solved, that thing needs a LOT of fuel.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/180355https://fargostreet.com/post/180355Mon, 22 Oct 2007 01:04:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Latest Dyno run on Sun, 21 Oct 2007 16:35:06 GMT]]>well that sux

Monty

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/180308https://fargostreet.com/post/180308Sun, 21 Oct 2007 16:35:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Latest Dyno run on Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:59:00 GMT]]>Running out of fuel now

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/179988https://fargostreet.com/post/179988Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:59:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Latest Dyno run on Fri, 19 Oct 2007 10:11:34 GMT]]>I've never been in a car with remotely close to that power must be sweet!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/179984https://fargostreet.com/post/179984Fri, 19 Oct 2007 10:11:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Latest Dyno run on Thu, 18 Oct 2007 04:59:17 GMT]]>VTEC? lol
There is always more power out there but I've never driven anything with more than 550 so ummm yeah

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/179770https://fargostreet.com/post/179770Thu, 18 Oct 2007 04:59:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Latest Dyno run on Fri, 05 Oct 2007 11:40:58 GMT]]>

probe this;188769 wrote:
4 valve heads? .
Not available

probe this;188769 wrote:
more boost?.
Running plenty, doesn't like more

probe this;188769 wrote:
bigger turbo's?.
Big enough

probe this;188769 wrote:
NITROUS!!!.
Thought about it

probe this;188769 wrote:
Not sure what all you have done, but some things to look at.
Pretty much everything.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/178044https://fargostreet.com/post/178044Fri, 05 Oct 2007 11:40:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Latest Dyno run on Fri, 05 Oct 2007 04:20:44 GMT]]>4 valve heads? more boost? bigger turbo? NITROUS!!!
Not sure what all you have done, but some things to look at.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/178035https://fargostreet.com/post/178035Fri, 05 Oct 2007 04:20:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Latest Dyno run on Fri, 05 Oct 2007 02:27:01 GMT]]>good luck!!

Monty

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/178008https://fargostreet.com/post/178008Fri, 05 Oct 2007 02:27:01 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Latest Dyno run on Fri, 05 Oct 2007 01:53:27 GMT]]>Got back on tues night with some new numbers. I did a cam change over the W/end. Thanx for the help MisterCMK:p: . Anyways final number was 1150 RWHP. Need to clean the pig up and save it for SEMA at the end of the month. Hopefully be in the top 5 with these numbers..

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/178002https://fargostreet.com/post/178002Fri, 05 Oct 2007 01:53:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Latest Dyno run on Mon, 01 Oct 2007 13:09:53 GMT]]>Going back to the dyno again this week. I made another change. This is starting to get old....Need to wake these turbos up, they are still pretty lazy...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/177313https://fargostreet.com/post/177313Mon, 01 Oct 2007 13:09:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Latest Dyno run on Mon, 24 Sep 2007 16:57:31 GMT]]>Congrats on the numbers. nice car too.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/176132https://fargostreet.com/post/176132Mon, 24 Sep 2007 16:57:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Latest Dyno run on Mon, 24 Sep 2007 16:11:30 GMT]]>

94NDTA;186779 wrote:
I think you have the highest rwhp of anyone on this site.

you think?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/176123https://fargostreet.com/post/176123Mon, 24 Sep 2007 16:11:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Latest Dyno run on Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:08:13 GMT]]>IMO you got a bottlekneck still somewhere from looking @ the graphs and how each boost level follows the same curve.

You gonna get another cam coming? Swap out that intake if Andy has that other one, got nothing to lose.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/176115https://fargostreet.com/post/176115Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:08:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Latest Dyno run on Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:59:59 GMT]]>

integra_gsr98;186787 wrote:
Did you swap out the valve springs yet?

Yep did that before the tangs were put in. Back pressure with new housings and 4" dual is only at 1.1 - 1 backpresure ratio.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/176114https://fargostreet.com/post/176114Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:59:59 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Latest Dyno run on Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:15:13 GMT]]>Did you swap out the valve springs yet?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/176106https://fargostreet.com/post/176106Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:15:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Latest Dyno run on Mon, 24 Sep 2007 05:38:15 GMT]]>I think you have the highest rwhp of anyone on this site.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/176098https://fargostreet.com/post/176098Mon, 24 Sep 2007 05:38:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Latest Dyno run on Mon, 24 Sep 2007 04:34:33 GMT]]>Thanx all, I am still searching for some more power though, not too sure where I am going to find it. Numbers I think are down from where it should be. Guys running these set-ups just don't like giving out too much info.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/176092https://fargostreet.com/post/176092Mon, 24 Sep 2007 04:34:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Latest Dyno run on Mon, 24 Sep 2007 04:26:59 GMT]]>wow, thats impressive

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/176091https://fargostreet.com/post/176091Mon, 24 Sep 2007 04:26:59 GMT