<![CDATA[blown ls1 evo??]]>http://www.dsmtuners.com/forums/showthread.php?p=151303437#post151303437

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/12281/blown-ls1-evoRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 10:02:09 GMTSat, 27 Oct 2007 00:02:30 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to blown ls1 evo?? on Tue, 30 Oct 2007 01:04:51 GMT]]>Poor Poor EVO

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/181413https://fargostreet.com/post/181413Tue, 30 Oct 2007 01:04:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to blown ls1 evo?? on Mon, 29 Oct 2007 07:07:06 GMT]]>i like how they complain about the weight of the LS1 versus the 4G. The LS1 is all aluminum and is ridiculously lightweight for such a powerhouse.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/181335https://fargostreet.com/post/181335Mon, 29 Oct 2007 07:07:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to blown ls1 evo?? on Sun, 28 Oct 2007 01:06:37 GMT]]>I have heard that this is just to get it all working, and it will have a really good mini tub in the back with 325 drag radials in by spring, and still keep the rear seating are looking stock. Thing will be fast as shit then.
Gary

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/181219https://fargostreet.com/post/181219Sun, 28 Oct 2007 01:06:37 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to blown ls1 evo?? on Sun, 28 Oct 2007 00:52:24 GMT]]>

wannabe;192029 wrote:
lets see a camaro with a 4g63 now....

Why ruin a camaro?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/181216https://fargostreet.com/post/181216Sun, 28 Oct 2007 00:52:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to blown ls1 evo?? on Sat, 27 Oct 2007 22:20:10 GMT]]>ya, thats totally a waste of a car... i agree with the point that if they woulda kept the awd factor it might have been sweet... but look how slow it is, with no grip lol...

but, imagine if it gripped instead of spun

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/181205https://fargostreet.com/post/181205Sat, 27 Oct 2007 22:20:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to blown ls1 evo?? on Sat, 27 Oct 2007 20:18:27 GMT]]>lets see a camaro with a 4g63 now....

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/181199https://fargostreet.com/post/181199Sat, 27 Oct 2007 20:18:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to blown ls1 evo?? on Sat, 27 Oct 2007 20:02:42 GMT]]>I love it. DSM with a V-8!!! Awesome. Sounds mean as hell too!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/181197https://fargostreet.com/post/181197Sat, 27 Oct 2007 20:02:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to blown ls1 evo?? on Sat, 27 Oct 2007 18:37:46 GMT]]>If they would've kept the AWD that thing would've been sick. Since it's not, it doesn't seem any cooler to me than a swapped RX7.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/181191https://fargostreet.com/post/181191Sat, 27 Oct 2007 18:37:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to blown ls1 evo?? on Sat, 27 Oct 2007 18:09:19 GMT]]>Finally someone putting a 350 into a car other than a Z or rx7...watch all the dsmers get butthurt now, they probably did it cause it's more reliable power...we all know that dsms dont always last the longest...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/181188https://fargostreet.com/post/181188Sat, 27 Oct 2007 18:09:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to blown ls1 evo?? on Sat, 27 Oct 2007 02:30:38 GMT]]>If they had kept and incorporated the awd somehow, they woulda had something. But it was a waste of time IMHO.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/181155https://fargostreet.com/post/181155Sat, 27 Oct 2007 02:30:38 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to blown ls1 evo?? on Sat, 27 Oct 2007 02:00:02 GMT]]>:rolleyes:

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/181152https://fargostreet.com/post/181152Sat, 27 Oct 2007 02:00:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to blown ls1 evo?? on Sat, 27 Oct 2007 01:32:23 GMT]]>If anything that ls1 makes the evo slower.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/181147https://fargostreet.com/post/181147Sat, 27 Oct 2007 01:32:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to blown ls1 evo?? on Sat, 27 Oct 2007 01:20:30 GMT]]>

wa2fastcamaro;191974 wrote:
but I could care less about a stock evo.

So you DO care about stock evos then...?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/181145https://fargostreet.com/post/181145Sat, 27 Oct 2007 01:20:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to blown ls1 evo?? on Sat, 27 Oct 2007 00:15:53 GMT]]>I see someone made a evo how they should be built. I'd drive that one, but I could care less about a stock evo.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/181144https://fargostreet.com/post/181144Sat, 27 Oct 2007 00:15:53 GMT