<![CDATA[Featured Car]]>Fargostreet will be having bi-weekly featured cars... but I need nominations! Please submit them via PM or just reply here!

Thanks,

Jim

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/123/featured-carRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 13:29:14 GMTThu, 24 Jun 2004 00:45:38 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Featured Car on Thu, 24 Jun 2004 23:30:10 GMT]]>hmmm...so the only time reaction counts is when you tie exactly on a race then, correct?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/972https://fargostreet.com/post/972Thu, 24 Jun 2004 23:30:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Featured Car on Thu, 24 Jun 2004 23:28:21 GMT]]>

tjamz wrote:
IF, for example, I had a 1.5 reaction, wouldn't I end up running 1 second slower than is theoretically possible with my car since I started a second after the race did? I may be wrong, but that was how I always thought it worked.

Nope, the clock doesn't start until you cross the line. So say you ran a 13.0,you could sit @ the line for 3 seconds then launch and still run a 13.0.

Nick

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/971https://fargostreet.com/post/971Thu, 24 Jun 2004 23:28:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Featured Car on Thu, 24 Jun 2004 23:06:25 GMT]]>bow down to the all mighty supra, especially red ones!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/970https://fargostreet.com/post/970Thu, 24 Jun 2004 23:06:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Featured Car on Thu, 24 Jun 2004 21:37:43 GMT]]>

2wheeler wrote:
Reaction times don't figure into ET.
IF, for example, I had a 1.5 reaction, wouldn't I end up running 1 second slower than is theoretically possible with my car since I started a second after the race did? I may be wrong, but that was how I always thought it worked.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/967https://fargostreet.com/post/967Thu, 24 Jun 2004 21:37:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Featured Car on Thu, 24 Jun 2004 17:20:33 GMT]]>lol him to. joel could get us his number, he lives across the street from him

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/957https://fargostreet.com/post/957Thu, 24 Jun 2004 17:20:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Featured Car on Thu, 24 Jun 2004 17:19:51 GMT]]>

RX8ownage wrote:
i nominate the eclipse gs from the crew.

how about that cavalier? 😄

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/955https://fargostreet.com/post/955Thu, 24 Jun 2004 17:19:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Featured Car on Thu, 24 Jun 2004 15:21:07 GMT]]>

tjamz wrote:
so given my horrible driving skills and bad reaction times I should be able to pull off 12's easy enough...LOL

Reaction times don't figure into ET.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/944https://fargostreet.com/post/944Thu, 24 Jun 2004 15:21:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Featured Car on Thu, 24 Jun 2004 13:48:20 GMT]]>i vote for dave as well.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/943https://fargostreet.com/post/943Thu, 24 Jun 2004 13:48:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Featured Car on Thu, 24 Jun 2004 06:33:14 GMT]]>i nominate the eclipse gs from the crew.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/940https://fargostreet.com/post/940Thu, 24 Jun 2004 06:33:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Featured Car on Thu, 24 Jun 2004 05:52:03 GMT]]>Hopefully I am WELL into them (12's) after I get my new FMIC and CAI installed...and a dyno tune (July 16th date for dynotune). Others running a similar setup to mine are running high 11's, so given my horrible driving skills and bad reaction times I should be able to pull off 12's easy enough...LOL

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/938https://fargostreet.com/post/938Thu, 24 Jun 2004 05:52:03 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Featured Car on Thu, 24 Jun 2004 05:05:19 GMT]]>

integra_gsr98 wrote:
Me. 11.91 @ 120 backed up w/ a 12.0 @ 120 last year making 50 or so less HP than Matt. Look for more 11s and hopefully some 10s by the end of the year.

crosses fingers

But I too vote for Dave. Then maybe Kevin in honor of his never going faster than 11.2. 🙂

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/934https://fargostreet.com/post/934Thu, 24 Jun 2004 05:05:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Featured Car on Thu, 24 Jun 2004 05:03:20 GMT]]>

tjamz wrote:
Who hit 11's w/ FWD? Matt Faul (FallGuy) for one (Ford Probe). I'm sure there are probably others.

Me. 11.91 @ 120 backed up w/ a 12.0 @ 120 last year making 50 or so less HP than Matt. Look for more 11s and hopefully some 10s by the end of the year.

crosses fingers

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/933https://fargostreet.com/post/933Thu, 24 Jun 2004 05:03:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Featured Car on Thu, 24 Jun 2004 04:34:48 GMT]]>we'll i'm pushin 12's

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/932https://fargostreet.com/post/932Thu, 24 Jun 2004 04:34:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Featured Car on Thu, 24 Jun 2004 03:55:13 GMT]]>Who hit 11's w/ FWD? Matt Faul (FallGuy) for one (Ford Probe). I'm sure there are probably others.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/929https://fargostreet.com/post/929Thu, 24 Jun 2004 03:55:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Featured Car on Thu, 24 Jun 2004 03:31:34 GMT]]>Who around here has an 11 sec FWD car?? One dip into the 11s doesn't make it an 11 sec car either! I too would have to nominate Dave to be first.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/926https://fargostreet.com/post/926Thu, 24 Jun 2004 03:31:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Featured Car on Thu, 24 Jun 2004 02:58:09 GMT]]>I would agree with that as well.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/925https://fargostreet.com/post/925Thu, 24 Jun 2004 02:58:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Featured Car on Thu, 24 Jun 2004 02:52:13 GMT]]>perhaps one of the 11sec fwd cars could be next? i think they're also the epitome of power and street-drivability

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/923https://fargostreet.com/post/923Thu, 24 Jun 2004 02:52:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Featured Car on Thu, 24 Jun 2004 01:33:37 GMT]]>Dave's the man he deserves to be first one

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/916https://fargostreet.com/post/916Thu, 24 Jun 2004 01:33:37 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Featured Car on Thu, 24 Jun 2004 01:25:21 GMT]]>or maybe my car being assembled? 😉 😄

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/915https://fargostreet.com/post/915Thu, 24 Jun 2004 01:25:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Featured Car on Thu, 24 Jun 2004 01:22:17 GMT]]>I second for DaveH

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/914https://fargostreet.com/post/914Thu, 24 Jun 2004 01:22:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Featured Car on Thu, 24 Jun 2004 01:13:13 GMT]]>I think it would be only fitting if DaveH was the first one. Kinda the holy grail of sport compact achievement that we are all striving for.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/913https://fargostreet.com/post/913Thu, 24 Jun 2004 01:13:13 GMT