<![CDATA[Real Photos of 4G]]>legacy image

legacy image

legacy image

legacy image

legacy image

legacy image

legacy image

legacy image

legacy image

legacy image

legacy image

Official Site opens today:

http://www.mitsubishicars.com/06eclipse/

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/1247/real-photos-of-4gRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 02:22:45 GMTMon, 10 Jan 2005 21:19:20 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Real Photos of 4G on Sun, 16 Jan 2005 16:56:20 GMT]]>no way, its a cross between a 350z and an Audi tt :thumbs down:

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/24454https://fargostreet.com/post/24454Sun, 16 Jan 2005 16:56:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Real Photos of 4G on Sat, 15 Jan 2005 21:07:12 GMT]]>I think it looks better then a 2G. 2G's look cool back in the day when they came out. This thing is more like a 1G + 2G.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/24320https://fargostreet.com/post/24320Sat, 15 Jan 2005 21:07:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Real Photos of 4G on Wed, 12 Jan 2005 08:13:46 GMT]]>ther r lots of cars that look better than 2gs...wat r u talkin bout

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/23297https://fargostreet.com/post/23297Wed, 12 Jan 2005 08:13:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Real Photos of 4G on Wed, 12 Jan 2005 07:28:27 GMT]]>i dont know if there will ever be a car to look as good as the 2g, but it doesn't look half bad. once you bolt on some force induction it just might have enough balls to move that heavy sob down the street.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/23291https://fargostreet.com/post/23291Wed, 12 Jan 2005 07:28:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Real Photos of 4G on Wed, 12 Jan 2005 07:19:16 GMT]]>I like it! 260hp thumbs down. For a 3.8L I exspected more at least 300-320hp. But Im sure a turbo kit coming out so its all good!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/23287https://fargostreet.com/post/23287Wed, 12 Jan 2005 07:19:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Real Photos of 4G on Wed, 12 Jan 2005 00:35:02 GMT]]>

LankorDie wrote:
People are going to door ding the hell out of those back fenders.

I think they do that no matter what though. God I hate parking at College. :mad:

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/23165https://fargostreet.com/post/23165Wed, 12 Jan 2005 00:35:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Real Photos of 4G on Tue, 11 Jan 2005 23:34:50 GMT]]>i think people will probably start to like the 4gs a lot more once they see them in person. im sure just seeing them in pictures isnt nearly as good as seeing them up close.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/23155https://fargostreet.com/post/23155Tue, 11 Jan 2005 23:34:50 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Real Photos of 4G on Tue, 11 Jan 2005 23:30:31 GMT]]>People are going to door ding the hell out of those back fenders.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/23153https://fargostreet.com/post/23153Tue, 11 Jan 2005 23:30:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Real Photos of 4G on Tue, 11 Jan 2005 23:28:12 GMT]]>

Jim wrote:
Some guy on tuners did this photoshop:

  • 18x7.5 Primax 786 rims
  • lowered
  • RM Lip
  • FMIC
  • Black housing projector headlights
  • Tinted windows
  • Carbon Fiber hood, wing & side skirts
    makes the car look somewhat better, but i still dislike the looks of the car
]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/23150https://fargostreet.com/post/23150Tue, 11 Jan 2005 23:28:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Real Photos of 4G on Tue, 11 Jan 2005 19:09:38 GMT]]>nice photoshop...i definitley still like the design of 2Gs better tho

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/23074https://fargostreet.com/post/23074Tue, 11 Jan 2005 19:09:38 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Real Photos of 4G on Tue, 11 Jan 2005 18:09:48 GMT]]>Some guy on tuners did this photoshop:

  • 18x7.5 Primax 786 rims
  • lowered
  • RM Lip
  • FMIC
  • Black housing projector headlights
  • Tinted windows
  • Carbon Fiber hood, wing & side skirts

beforeafter.jpg

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/23061https://fargostreet.com/post/23061Tue, 11 Jan 2005 18:09:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Real Photos of 4G on Tue, 11 Jan 2005 18:08:34 GMT]]>legacy image
legacy image
legacy image

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/23058https://fargostreet.com/post/23058Tue, 11 Jan 2005 18:08:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Real Photos of 4G on Tue, 11 Jan 2005 08:28:32 GMT]]>I am not sure if Mitsu will ever be able to reproduce the great looks of the 2g. Which also I think is the best looking.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/23000https://fargostreet.com/post/23000Tue, 11 Jan 2005 08:28:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Real Photos of 4G on Tue, 11 Jan 2005 08:08:27 GMT]]>hehe how are you biased?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/22991https://fargostreet.com/post/22991Tue, 11 Jan 2005 08:08:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Real Photos of 4G on Tue, 11 Jan 2005 06:35:43 GMT]]>Yeah i'm biased to... it looks nice the interior is really nice but the back i'm not liking so much... I dunno

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/22979https://fargostreet.com/post/22979Tue, 11 Jan 2005 06:35:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Real Photos of 4G on Tue, 11 Jan 2005 06:08:15 GMT]]>or maybe u jus a lil biased like Jimmy eh ^^^

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/22970https://fargostreet.com/post/22970Tue, 11 Jan 2005 06:08:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Real Photos of 4G on Tue, 11 Jan 2005 05:37:17 GMT]]>That car sucks. Mitsu fucked up. It looks like a fucking Cavalier in the front, and then mated it to a Nissan Murano or some shit. I have to agree, the 2G still looks the best by far 😉

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/22955https://fargostreet.com/post/22955Tue, 11 Jan 2005 05:37:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Real Photos of 4G on Tue, 11 Jan 2005 05:31:38 GMT]]>i think it looks like a audi tt from the back....and has likea evo kind of grill.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/22952https://fargostreet.com/post/22952Tue, 11 Jan 2005 05:31:38 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Real Photos of 4G on Tue, 11 Jan 2005 05:18:47 GMT]]>that motor is begging for a TT

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/22945https://fargostreet.com/post/22945Tue, 11 Jan 2005 05:18:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Real Photos of 4G on Tue, 11 Jan 2005 05:15:16 GMT]]>http://www.supercars.net/cars/2006@$Mitsubishi@$Eclipse GTx.html

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/22941https://fargostreet.com/post/22941Tue, 11 Jan 2005 05:15:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Real Photos of 4G on Tue, 11 Jan 2005 04:46:34 GMT]]>I don't like it.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/22936https://fargostreet.com/post/22936Tue, 11 Jan 2005 04:46:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Real Photos of 4G on Tue, 11 Jan 2005 04:23:05 GMT]]>its nice and its better then my car...lol

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/22930https://fargostreet.com/post/22930Tue, 11 Jan 2005 04:23:05 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Real Photos of 4G on Tue, 11 Jan 2005 04:22:10 GMT]]>

My NOva wrote:
i like jims 2g that thing is tight

why

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/22929https://fargostreet.com/post/22929Tue, 11 Jan 2005 04:22:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Real Photos of 4G on Mon, 10 Jan 2005 23:48:55 GMT]]>

Jim wrote:
IMO it looks like a Tiburon crossed with a pontiac
i second that. I don't like the looks of the car at all!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/22897https://fargostreet.com/post/22897Mon, 10 Jan 2005 23:48:55 GMT