<![CDATA[Look @ that Wave...]]>legacy image

Check out this Tsunami picture..
A picture is worth a thousand words...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/1250/look-@-that-wave...RSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 00:00:55 GMTTue, 11 Jan 2005 04:12:35 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Look @ that Wave... on Tue, 11 Jan 2005 08:19:20 GMT]]>I want to see what the city will look like after all the water is gone, pretty crazy im sure

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/22995https://fargostreet.com/post/22995Tue, 11 Jan 2005 08:19:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Look @ that Wave... on Tue, 11 Jan 2005 08:14:55 GMT]]>those are some pretty crazy pictures...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/22993https://fargostreet.com/post/22993Tue, 11 Jan 2005 08:14:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Look @ that Wave... on Tue, 11 Jan 2005 06:29:35 GMT]]>Ok here's what I got... nothing too special.

tsunami.jpg
tsunami3.jpg
tsunami4.jpg
tsunami5.jpg

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/22976https://fargostreet.com/post/22976Tue, 11 Jan 2005 06:29:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Look @ that Wave... on Tue, 11 Jan 2005 06:11:49 GMT]]>I have some photos..i'll get them up

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/22974https://fargostreet.com/post/22974Tue, 11 Jan 2005 06:11:49 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Look @ that Wave... on Tue, 11 Jan 2005 06:11:25 GMT]]>

STiSchucky wrote:
Stil gives a relative idea of what a Tsunami may look like at its worse...traveling at high speeds

That's for sure... it's still amazing how many people have died.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/22973https://fargostreet.com/post/22973Tue, 11 Jan 2005 06:11:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Look @ that Wave... on Tue, 11 Jan 2005 06:10:51 GMT]]>Well if anyone have photo's post em.... 🙂 preferably real ones..

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/22972https://fargostreet.com/post/22972Tue, 11 Jan 2005 06:10:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Look @ that Wave... on Tue, 11 Jan 2005 06:06:31 GMT]]>Stil gives a relative idea of what a Tsunami may look like at its worse...traveling at high speeds

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/22968https://fargostreet.com/post/22968Tue, 11 Jan 2005 06:06:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Look @ that Wave... on Tue, 11 Jan 2005 05:51:44 GMT]]>

jct_4628 wrote:
kinda what I think too

it was confirmed fake on a website..... I'd have to dig up the website I was looking at that had that on again though...
~Traffic is wrong for that city (that it supposedly hit)... wrong side of the street.
~Wave was "confirmed" at 4m high when it hit that city, not 15 stories tall....

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/22961https://fargostreet.com/post/22961Tue, 11 Jan 2005 05:51:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Look @ that Wave... on Tue, 11 Jan 2005 05:39:57 GMT]]>

dubbsy wrote:
and it's fake........

kinda what I think too

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/22957https://fargostreet.com/post/22957Tue, 11 Jan 2005 05:39:57 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Look @ that Wave... on Tue, 11 Jan 2005 05:30:08 GMT]]>and it's fake........

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/22951https://fargostreet.com/post/22951Tue, 11 Jan 2005 05:30:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Look @ that Wave... on Tue, 11 Jan 2005 05:20:08 GMT]]>I'm sure some may have seen this already but I just figured I'd pop it up again; just got it in an e-mail first time i've seen it. I've seen a few video's but that was just the gush of the waves into a resort nothing serious; just level of water keeps rising. Seeing that in person/video wise would be insane cuz it would have to knowck out a few buildings or so...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/22946https://fargostreet.com/post/22946Tue, 11 Jan 2005 05:20:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Look @ that Wave... on Tue, 11 Jan 2005 05:16:48 GMT]]>oh em ef jee

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/22944https://fargostreet.com/post/22944Tue, 11 Jan 2005 05:16:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Look @ that Wave... on Tue, 11 Jan 2005 05:04:18 GMT]]>i think i just shat myself

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/22938https://fargostreet.com/post/22938Tue, 11 Jan 2005 05:04:18 GMT