<![CDATA[Gamefly anyone?]]>Anyone try this out? I have a 2-game sub. I hvae Tiger 2005 and Mercenaries on the way.

If you do want to try it put me as your reference bad93ex@hotmail.com.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/1266/gamefly-anyoneRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 06:07:18 GMTWed, 12 Jan 2005 16:17:18 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Gamefly anyone? on Sun, 16 Jan 2005 05:05:46 GMT]]>Got my stuff in today from Gamefly and I am loving Mercenaries. I highly recommend the service if you like to play a lot of games.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/24411https://fargostreet.com/post/24411Sun, 16 Jan 2005 05:05:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Gamefly anyone? on Sat, 15 Jan 2005 07:49:02 GMT]]>Yeah i may have to buy a GC just for that game if it is all they say it will be. Alot of the zeldas have been shot at little kids sounds like this one will be more for us big kids. Dude....you could spend hours upon hours and still not beat Morrowind. I have it for 2 years before i actually got motivated to beat it. Wayyy to much crap you can do.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/24234https://fargostreet.com/post/24234Sat, 15 Jan 2005 07:49:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Gamefly anyone? on Sat, 15 Jan 2005 06:51:00 GMT]]>

-GSX-Falcon wrote:
Ocarina of Time was badass too. Speaking of which they are coming out with another "Adultish" Zelda again soon.
I thought I saw something like that on TechTV about a Mature Zelda where looks realistic.

I never really ever got the chance to play morrowind because my PC sucks.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/24232https://fargostreet.com/post/24232Sat, 15 Jan 2005 06:51:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Gamefly anyone? on Sat, 15 Jan 2005 04:11:58 GMT]]>Ocarina of Time was badass too. Speaking of which they are coming out with another "Adultish" Zelda again soon.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/24215https://fargostreet.com/post/24215Sat, 15 Jan 2005 04:11:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Gamefly anyone? on Sat, 15 Jan 2005 04:04:44 GMT]]>

Bad93ex wrote:
Is there any games out there that you could spend that much time in? I dont think even RPGs get that long. The first time through FF VII it was about 70 hours.
Morrowind takes alot more then 70....

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/24212https://fargostreet.com/post/24212Sat, 15 Jan 2005 04:04:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Gamefly anyone? on Fri, 14 Jan 2005 20:08:29 GMT]]>well, i'm not referring to how long it takes to beat it in a straight-through play, but how long i can spend playing it. for example, legend of zelda: a link to the past never gets old.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/24063https://fargostreet.com/post/24063Fri, 14 Jan 2005 20:08:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Gamefly anyone? on Fri, 14 Jan 2005 19:08:27 GMT]]>Is there any games out there that you could spend that much time in? I dont think even RPGs get that long. The first time through FF VII it was about 70 hours.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/24056https://fargostreet.com/post/24056Fri, 14 Jan 2005 19:08:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Gamefly anyone? on Fri, 14 Jan 2005 18:11:04 GMT]]>i can't bring myself to try it because i don't play games regularly enough to figure out whether i'll get the use out of it. besides, for a monthly subscription, i could rent a game, and then buy it over ebay. if i need to buy more than a game a month, i need to start doing more research before i buy. if i can't spend more than 100hrs playing a game, it's not worth buying (ie why i ignore nfsu, srs, gta, etc...)

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/24050https://fargostreet.com/post/24050Fri, 14 Jan 2005 18:11:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Gamefly anyone? on Wed, 12 Jan 2005 21:10:53 GMT]]>Mercenaries is tight as hell right now me and my guitarest yoran are switching back and forth

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/23381https://fargostreet.com/post/23381Wed, 12 Jan 2005 21:10:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Gamefly anyone? on Wed, 12 Jan 2005 20:32:52 GMT]]>I did it because I have a hard time getting games back in time and that the selection here in Fergus is terrible. Plus there are games that I found on there that just looked appealing and want to try them.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/23369https://fargostreet.com/post/23369Wed, 12 Jan 2005 20:32:52 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Gamefly anyone? on Wed, 12 Jan 2005 18:44:18 GMT]]>I do netflix cuz I watch movies so much more than I play games. There arent that many games out there that I want right now. Old movies are still good, but some old games have shitty graphics and no point and they are stupid (although some are classic) so its easier to rent more movies than games. Thats my .02.....but if there were a bunch of games I wanted to rent I would do gamefly as opposed to rent them from a local store. I have checked into gamefly before but I coudnt find enough games to make it worthwile....hehe...wow that got long

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/23356https://fargostreet.com/post/23356Wed, 12 Jan 2005 18:44:18 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Gamefly anyone? on Wed, 12 Jan 2005 17:04:23 GMT]]>

99slowGSX wrote:
Tiger 2005 is sweet.
I was skeptical of it at first but the Career mode is unbelievably addicting. I think I spent about 12 hours straight playing it once.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/23340https://fargostreet.com/post/23340Wed, 12 Jan 2005 17:04:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Gamefly anyone? on Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:51:31 GMT]]>Tiger 2005 is sweet.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/23339https://fargostreet.com/post/23339Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:51:31 GMT