<![CDATA[350Z.....shit?]]>This guy has got to be on crack....I am wanting one of these in the future...so it may be just me, but if it isnt let me know. (the reason he says "zed" is how they say it in England...)

http://youtube.com/watch?v=pWC8cten_7Q

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/12759/350z.....shitRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 19:03:05 GMTSun, 16 Dec 2007 00:16:27 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to 350Z.....shit? on Sun, 16 Dec 2007 19:00:41 GMT]]>the side bar on the wiki page shows the engine history: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/350z

they've changed the engine spec twice and in all cases its been 3.5L, but different heads, cams, tuning, etc keep getting more power and top end out of it. The same motor in the Infinity G class will apparently wind into the 7000s.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/188092https://fargostreet.com/post/188092Sun, 16 Dec 2007 19:00:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 350Z.....shit? on Sun, 16 Dec 2007 18:55:21 GMT]]>

thrash;199077 wrote:
i drove the 350z when it first came out several years ago. My impression at the time was that the VQ35 engine was a truck motor (which it is -- it's used across the nissan family of vehicles). It ran out of breath before hitting the redline. it had strong midrange torque but didn't pull hard to the limiter. I also think that we drove the car pretty hard and it stank like hell by the time we were done with it.

The S30 is the best looking Z car ever made, IMO. The Z31 is kind of an ugly duckling, the Z32 is absolutely beautiful, and for its day was a worthy competitor to the FD and the JZA80. I think the Z32 twin turbo in black is probably the sweet spot of the Z lineup. Good daily driver, huge power potential..

The Z33 just doesn't do it for me. I hear that the newer ones have an improved engine and anecdotally, it pulls harder in the upper register than the original motor did, so I might give it another shake.

this newer 350Z you speak of with an improved engine I am thinking is the 380Z.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/188091https://fargostreet.com/post/188091Sun, 16 Dec 2007 18:55:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 350Z.....shit? on Sun, 16 Dec 2007 18:54:24 GMT]]>Well, I was taken aback by this about the Z33 (350) I was wondering which would be my senior car, I was in between the Z32 and Z33, It is seeming to me that the Z32 has all beat (plus its alot cheaper). As for the Z31 being an "ugly duckiling" I kinda agree...although all it really needs is a few things to make it nice, Im looking for some Z33 wheels and might change the seats to 88SS ones.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/188090https://fargostreet.com/post/188090Sun, 16 Dec 2007 18:54:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 350Z.....shit? on Sun, 16 Dec 2007 17:59:44 GMT]]>i drove the 350z when it first came out several years ago. My impression at the time was that the VQ35 engine was a truck motor (which it is -- it's used across the nissan family of vehicles). It ran out of breath before hitting the redline. it had strong midrange torque but didn't pull hard to the limiter. I also think that we drove the car pretty hard and it stank like hell by the time we were done with it.

The S30 is the best looking Z car ever made, IMO. The Z31 is kind of an ugly duckling, the Z32 is absolutely beautiful, and for its day was a worthy competitor to the FD and the JZA80. I think the Z32 twin turbo in black is probably the sweet spot of the Z lineup. Good daily driver, huge power potential..

The Z33 just doesn't do it for me. I hear that the newer ones have an improved engine and anecdotally, it pulls harder in the upper register than the original motor did, so I might give it another shake.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/188084https://fargostreet.com/post/188084Sun, 16 Dec 2007 17:59:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 350Z.....shit? on Sun, 16 Dec 2007 17:15:47 GMT]]>i agree with him as well

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/188081https://fargostreet.com/post/188081Sun, 16 Dec 2007 17:15:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 350Z.....shit? on Sun, 16 Dec 2007 09:03:53 GMT]]>I hated the way they said Z....i couldnt finish the video it bothered me so much

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/188067https://fargostreet.com/post/188067Sun, 16 Dec 2007 09:03:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 350Z.....shit? on Sun, 16 Dec 2007 08:49:37 GMT]]>I agree with the host...Z cars started off great...but generation by generation they went to shit...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/188066https://fargostreet.com/post/188066Sun, 16 Dec 2007 08:49:37 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 350Z.....shit? on Sun, 16 Dec 2007 07:02:54 GMT]]>I've always liked em but im not that picky really, as long as its right wheel drive.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/188061https://fargostreet.com/post/188061Sun, 16 Dec 2007 07:02:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 350Z.....shit? on Sun, 16 Dec 2007 04:38:52 GMT]]>:deadhorse: Week motors

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/188040https://fargostreet.com/post/188040Sun, 16 Dec 2007 04:38:52 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 350Z.....shit? on Sun, 16 Dec 2007 03:27:19 GMT]]>they really are not that fast
or cool the looks imo are not that great

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/188035https://fargostreet.com/post/188035Sun, 16 Dec 2007 03:27:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 350Z.....shit? on Sun, 16 Dec 2007 03:15:28 GMT]]>

JN210;199007 wrote:
(the reason he says "zed" is how they say it in England...)

And Canada

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/188033https://fargostreet.com/post/188033Sun, 16 Dec 2007 03:15:28 GMT