<![CDATA[it was time for an upgrade....]]>Look at this monster!! 139mm blower. supposedly this will make close to 3000hp, that is insane. The black Trans Am they are putting it in used to run a 123mm F3A procharger, this is a F3R, the biggest one they make.
With the 123mm, stock suspension, and drag radials. 3420lbs raceweight
[B]4.89@155 in the 1/8th![B]
They are looking to get into the 4.20s@160 this year with a major diet down to around 3000 even and another 300-400hp or so.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/13037/it-was-time-for-an-upgrade....RSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 01:21:55 GMTThu, 24 Jan 2008 03:34:59 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to it was time for an upgrade.... on Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:50:20 GMT]]>

DrifterExtreme;202739 wrote:
yeah because v8's can't spool turbo's for shit..... :icon_scratch:

Not like a roots style SC....

:icon_scratch:

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/191619https://fargostreet.com/post/191619Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:50:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to it was time for an upgrade.... on Sat, 26 Jan 2008 05:38:14 GMT]]>

Bassplayer;202781 wrote:
So i never got this, what is that that giant ass thing being put in?

To go fast and devour babies at the same time duh.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/191583https://fargostreet.com/post/191583Sat, 26 Jan 2008 05:38:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to it was time for an upgrade.... on Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:18:51 GMT]]>

zbrown;202758 wrote:
an overabundance actually..............600lbft is weaksause once again 😉

cummnis FTW, haha
i figured you would come back with a comment about your truck.... lol

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/191576https://fargostreet.com/post/191576Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:18:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to it was time for an upgrade.... on Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:41:08 GMT]]>So i never got this, what is that that giant ass thing being put in?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/191571https://fargostreet.com/post/191571Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:41:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to it was time for an upgrade.... on Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:35:32 GMT]]>

zbrown;202758 wrote:
an overabundance actually..............600lbft is weaksause once again 😉

cummnis FTW, haha

Well, if its so weak lets line em up!
See, unlike you, who has hp and no tq, or tq and no hp, the in between of having lots of hp ALONG with lots of tq is where its at!
n00b!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/191557https://fargostreet.com/post/191557Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:35:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to it was time for an upgrade.... on Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:59:48 GMT]]>HOLY!!!, damn....I also say it could suck in a baby...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/191549https://fargostreet.com/post/191549Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:59:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to it was time for an upgrade.... on Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:54:21 GMT]]>

Parker;202745 wrote:
torque?

an overabundance actually..............600lbft is weaksause once again 😉

cummnis FTW, haha

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/191548https://fargostreet.com/post/191548Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:54:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to it was time for an upgrade.... on Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:03:48 GMT]]>

Parker;202745 wrote:
torque?

for realz, i LOL'ed at that, funny

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/191539https://fargostreet.com/post/191539Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:03:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to it was time for an upgrade.... on Fri, 25 Jan 2008 07:46:39 GMT]]>Don't worry, it's not-applicable to rotary and Honda owners.

Sorry Zach.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/191537https://fargostreet.com/post/191537Fri, 25 Jan 2008 07:46:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to it was time for an upgrade.... on Fri, 25 Jan 2008 07:34:29 GMT]]>torque?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/191535https://fargostreet.com/post/191535Fri, 25 Jan 2008 07:34:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to it was time for an upgrade.... on Fri, 25 Jan 2008 07:18:45 GMT]]>fucking weaksause^^^^

even I have a 75mm turbo....weak

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/191534https://fargostreet.com/post/191534Fri, 25 Jan 2008 07:18:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to it was time for an upgrade.... on Fri, 25 Jan 2008 06:39:33 GMT]]>

KA-T_240;202740 wrote:
^Yup.

I think Austins T/A spools pretty damn good. Shit look at the monster on Gary's GN.

MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAH :3gears::3gears:

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/191532https://fargostreet.com/post/191532Fri, 25 Jan 2008 06:39:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to it was time for an upgrade.... on Fri, 25 Jan 2008 05:47:40 GMT]]>^Yup.

I think Austins T/A spools pretty damn good. Shit look at the monster on Gary's GN.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/191530https://fargostreet.com/post/191530Fri, 25 Jan 2008 05:47:40 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to it was time for an upgrade.... on Fri, 25 Jan 2008 05:42:52 GMT]]>yeah because v8's can't spool turbo's for shit..... :icon_scratch:

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/191529https://fargostreet.com/post/191529Fri, 25 Jan 2008 05:42:52 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to it was time for an upgrade.... on Fri, 25 Jan 2008 05:41:59 GMT]]>

94NDTA;202736 wrote:
Or would be more fun to drive.

Instant roots style boost + V8 = the sex!!

Yet another reason 03/04 Cobra > *

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/191528https://fargostreet.com/post/191528Fri, 25 Jan 2008 05:41:59 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to it was time for an upgrade.... on Fri, 25 Jan 2008 05:37:41 GMT]]>

KA-T_240;202735 wrote:
Probably cause a turbo vette would never happen from the factory. The supercharger setups they probably cost less then a turbo would for a vette.

Or would be more fun to drive.

Instant roots style boost + V8 = the sex!!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/191526https://fargostreet.com/post/191526Fri, 25 Jan 2008 05:37:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to it was time for an upgrade.... on Fri, 25 Jan 2008 05:34:53 GMT]]>Probably cause a turbo vette would never happen from the factory. The supercharger setups they probably cost less then a turbo would for a vette.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/191525https://fargostreet.com/post/191525Fri, 25 Jan 2008 05:34:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to it was time for an upgrade.... on Fri, 25 Jan 2008 05:19:47 GMT]]>

zbrown;202699 wrote:
Ill put money it falls out of that peak efficiency in a hurry...... alot harder to get a heat exchanger on a eaton still vs a turbo.....

interesting none the less, i am just severely biased 🙂

I guess only time will tell. Its the supercharger they're putting on the new zr1 vette so i'd guess its pretty reliable.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/191522https://fargostreet.com/post/191522Fri, 25 Jan 2008 05:19:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to it was time for an upgrade.... on Fri, 25 Jan 2008 01:40:04 GMT]]>.......and severly slow!!!
HA

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/191497https://fargostreet.com/post/191497Fri, 25 Jan 2008 01:40:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to it was time for an upgrade.... on Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:29:14 GMT]]>

Bassplayer;202691 wrote:
LOL yeah, even though Eaton now makes a Eaton four lobe Roots type supercharger that has like 75% efficiency.

Ill put money it falls out of that peak efficiency in a hurry...... alot harder to get a heat exchanger on a eaton still vs a turbo.....

interesting none the less, i am just severely biased 🙂

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/191489https://fargostreet.com/post/191489Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:29:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to it was time for an upgrade.... on Thu, 24 Jan 2008 23:03:26 GMT]]>

integra_gsr98;202687 wrote:
Now imagine if they'd just use turbos!!

LOL yeah, even though Eaton now makes a Eaton four lobe Roots type supercharger that has like 75% efficiency.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/191481https://fargostreet.com/post/191481Thu, 24 Jan 2008 23:03:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to it was time for an upgrade.... on Thu, 24 Jan 2008 23:00:59 GMT]]>

integra_gsr98;202687 wrote:
Now imagine if they'd just use turbos!!

Then that thing would never spool up.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/191479https://fargostreet.com/post/191479Thu, 24 Jan 2008 23:00:59 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to it was time for an upgrade.... on Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:59:58 GMT]]>Thats insane, wow cool

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/191478https://fargostreet.com/post/191478Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:59:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to it was time for an upgrade.... on Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:38:10 GMT]]>Now imagine if they'd just use turbos!!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/191477https://fargostreet.com/post/191477Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:38:10 GMT