<![CDATA[r32 vs. r33 vs. r34 vs. r35 size comparison]]>Looks a bit wider than the r34 but about the same size that i thought it would.

gtrs_488.jpg

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/13099/r32-vs.-r33-vs.-r34-vs.-r35-size-comparisonRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 03:03:40 GMTSat, 02 Feb 2008 05:10:11 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to r32 vs. r33 vs. r34 vs. r35 size comparison on Mon, 04 Feb 2008 07:43:53 GMT]]>R32 is the best looking IMO. Also has the real race pedigree, revived the Skyline GT-R brand, re-established racing dominance, etc etc.

The R32 GT-R is kind of like the E30 M3 was for BMW... the R32 is the one that really "started it all".

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/192769https://fargostreet.com/post/192769Mon, 04 Feb 2008 07:43:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to r32 vs. r33 vs. r34 vs. r35 size comparison on Sun, 03 Feb 2008 15:00:22 GMT]]>^ And it's an RB20, so the motor has no balls, and the turbo is junk.

About the only thing cool about a GT-S4 is that it's AWD foe doe. R33 Autech > Any other foe doe Skylines.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/192591https://fargostreet.com/post/192591Sun, 03 Feb 2008 15:00:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to r32 vs. r33 vs. r34 vs. r35 size comparison on Sun, 03 Feb 2008 08:52:05 GMT]]>There are more single turbo skylines then twin turbo ones. How bout a r32 gts-4? awd rb20det thats a single turbo stock skyline.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/192581https://fargostreet.com/post/192581Sun, 03 Feb 2008 08:52:05 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to r32 vs. r33 vs. r34 vs. r35 size comparison on Sun, 03 Feb 2008 08:27:24 GMT]]>Some skylines do come with a Single Turbo stock R33 RB25DET for exp!!! now i can honestly say i see more Skylines than civics in AUS they are a dime a dozen here...mainly R32's and 33's though. Still F-in sweet to see em though...also alot of Silvias...22B Imprezas as well.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/192578https://fargostreet.com/post/192578Sun, 03 Feb 2008 08:27:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to r32 vs. r33 vs. r34 vs. r35 size comparison on Sun, 03 Feb 2008 08:08:25 GMT]]>

KA-T_240;203801 wrote:
^what about a nice single turbo?

Im talking stock. Modded, yes a nice big single will do i suppose:3gears:

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/192577https://fargostreet.com/post/192577Sun, 03 Feb 2008 08:08:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to r32 vs. r33 vs. r34 vs. r35 size comparison on Sun, 03 Feb 2008 08:05:15 GMT]]>^what about a nice single turbo?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/192576https://fargostreet.com/post/192576Sun, 03 Feb 2008 08:05:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to r32 vs. r33 vs. r34 vs. r35 size comparison on Sun, 03 Feb 2008 07:42:49 GMT]]>

bubba;203792 wrote:
Meh...the R35's just arent appealing at all... the other ones however are very hot... If I could get any skyline it'd be the '71 C10 2000GT-R

They weren't really made to look uber good looking they were designed for aerodynamics. If I had the choice I would more than likely go for an R32. The R35 looks good and has decent power but just thinking about the 3.8 v6 just seems kinda sacreligous(sp?) to me. TT inline 6 or nothing.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/192571https://fargostreet.com/post/192571Sun, 03 Feb 2008 07:42:49 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to r32 vs. r33 vs. r34 vs. r35 size comparison on Sun, 03 Feb 2008 07:30:45 GMT]]>Meh...the R35's just arent appealing at all... the other ones however are very hot... If I could get any skyline it'd be the '71 C10 2000GT-R

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/192567https://fargostreet.com/post/192567Sun, 03 Feb 2008 07:30:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to r32 vs. r33 vs. r34 vs. r35 size comparison on Sun, 03 Feb 2008 07:09:59 GMT]]>

zbrown;203712 wrote:
Ha I think the statement fits Parker

Domestics smaller lighter than the imports.... what is happening
evolution?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/192565https://fargostreet.com/post/192565Sun, 03 Feb 2008 07:09:59 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to r32 vs. r33 vs. r34 vs. r35 size comparison on Sun, 03 Feb 2008 05:16:01 GMT]]>

KA-T_240;203638 wrote:
BTW: There is a R33 that is in ND.

Ya know, you REALLY need to get out of ND and get your automotive cherry popped. See something new.

I've seen more broken R33s in the last 2 weeks than 240s in the state of ND.

I'm really looking forward to seeing the new GT-R. Only 2 dealerships here in GA are getting them.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/192542https://fargostreet.com/post/192542Sun, 03 Feb 2008 05:16:01 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to r32 vs. r33 vs. r34 vs. r35 size comparison on Sun, 03 Feb 2008 00:18:17 GMT]]>

Parker;203590 wrote:
whats that white boat doing at the end of the line ?

Ha I think the statement fits Parker

Domestics smaller lighter than the imports.... what is happening

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/192490https://fargostreet.com/post/192490Sun, 03 Feb 2008 00:18:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to r32 vs. r33 vs. r34 vs. r35 size comparison on Sat, 02 Feb 2008 19:46:46 GMT]]>

thurmanmerman;203592 wrote:
The "white boat" on the end is the r35
i was kidding....

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/192438https://fargostreet.com/post/192438Sat, 02 Feb 2008 19:46:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to r32 vs. r33 vs. r34 vs. r35 size comparison on Sat, 02 Feb 2008 19:46:11 GMT]]>

KA-T_240;203638 wrote:
BTW: There is a R33 that is in ND. who cares....

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/192437https://fargostreet.com/post/192437Sat, 02 Feb 2008 19:46:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to r32 vs. r33 vs. r34 vs. r35 size comparison on Sat, 02 Feb 2008 17:03:00 GMT]]>^and the one he gets, I'll take the rest.

I would do the fallowing order

R32, R35, R34, R33.

BTW: There is a R33 that is in ND.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/192416https://fargostreet.com/post/192416Sat, 02 Feb 2008 17:03:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to r32 vs. r33 vs. r34 vs. r35 size comparison on Sat, 02 Feb 2008 16:15:41 GMT]]>i dont care which one it is, id take any one of them!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/192400https://fargostreet.com/post/192400Sat, 02 Feb 2008 16:15:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to r32 vs. r33 vs. r34 vs. r35 size comparison on Sat, 02 Feb 2008 16:06:26 GMT]]>I'd definitely take a 32 or 33 before any others.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/192398https://fargostreet.com/post/192398Sat, 02 Feb 2008 16:06:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to r32 vs. r33 vs. r34 vs. r35 size comparison on Sat, 02 Feb 2008 14:17:53 GMT]]>r33's are so fucking hot

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/192394https://fargostreet.com/post/192394Sat, 02 Feb 2008 14:17:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to r32 vs. r33 vs. r34 vs. r35 size comparison on Sat, 02 Feb 2008 09:23:16 GMT]]>R33.... Ftw

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/192382https://fargostreet.com/post/192382Sat, 02 Feb 2008 09:23:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to r32 vs. r33 vs. r34 vs. r35 size comparison on Sat, 02 Feb 2008 08:54:10 GMT]]>i would rather have the R32 or R34

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/192380https://fargostreet.com/post/192380Sat, 02 Feb 2008 08:54:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to r32 vs. r33 vs. r34 vs. r35 size comparison on Sat, 02 Feb 2008 05:51:18 GMT]]>I dunno why, but I think it's funny that they used a modded R33 and the rest were stock.

R32 had the lowest roof line between the 32-34 generations, and as soon as I saw that I knew that something looked odd in the pic.

R32 > *

Least weight, shortest wheelbase, lowest in overall stock roof height. Plus they just look so badass.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/192371https://fargostreet.com/post/192371Sat, 02 Feb 2008 05:51:18 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to r32 vs. r33 vs. r34 vs. r35 size comparison on Sat, 02 Feb 2008 05:34:18 GMT]]>

Parker;203590 wrote:
whats that white boat doing at the end of the line up?..... and weres the R35 you speak of?

The "white boat" on the end is the r35

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/192370https://fargostreet.com/post/192370Sat, 02 Feb 2008 05:34:18 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to r32 vs. r33 vs. r34 vs. r35 size comparison on Sat, 02 Feb 2008 05:14:20 GMT]]>whats that white boat doing at the end of the line up?..... and weres the R35 you speak of?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/192368https://fargostreet.com/post/192368Sat, 02 Feb 2008 05:14:20 GMT