z31;206511 wrote:
Link please.

http://siouxfallsracing.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?t=28564&highlight=dave+camaro

Video's a pictures are gone but still a bit of information proving the LS1

zbrown;206471 wrote:
It does have long tubes...... and it is still a bitch....

rear driverside plug > zac

Though it does run good on the 125 shot, stall, and gears

He wants to do plug wires...... I was like

Been there, done that on Camzaro's car when he used to live up here. It wasn't all that bad.

JN210;205820 wrote:
psh....while we are all dreaming big....why not just throw a Lamborghini engine in it?
If i was starting a performance build on a 300zx, i would start with a LSX. :icon_bigsmurf:
Six bolt main caps FTW :icon_cheers:

Silver97;206256 wrote:
I would love to have a G-body LS1. Have any of you guys seen the video of Dave's SS Camaro in Sioux Falls when it did the wheel stand on a 200 shot and smashed the block?

Link please.

zbrown;206471 wrote:
It does have long tubes...... and it is still a bitch....

rear driverside plug > zac

Though it does run good on the 125 shot, stall, and gears

He wants to do plug wires...... I was like

Oh...well then, imagine how hard the rear driverside plug is, then multiply that by 10, and thats how hard it is with stock manifolds on. LT's it's a cake walk.

94NDTA;206450 wrote:
Put long tubes on the LT1 and get rid of the emissions and it is a lot easier

It does have long tubes...... and it is still a bitch....

rear driverside plug > zac

Though it does run good on the 125 shot, stall, and gears

He wants to do plug wires...... I was like

I dunno looks like the LS1 is harder to work on then the L36

zbrown;206408 wrote:
lol.....

I was making a joke that he had to have a monkey to work on late model stuff.......

LT1 comaro FTMFL...... is the LS1 any easier, cuz that LT1 is a bitch to work on

Put long tubes on the LT1 and get rid of the emissions and it is a lot easier

that got me going this moring

zbrown;206408 wrote:
lol.....

I was making a joke that he had to have a monkey to work on late model stuff.......

LT1 comaro FTMFL...... is the LS1 any easier, cuz that LT1 is a bitch to work on

Piece of cake. We're doing a plug change here.

I was making a joke that he had to have a monkey to work on late model stuff.......

LT1 comaro FTMFL...... is the LS1 any easier, cuz that LT1 is a bitch to work on

zbrown;206273 wrote:
What is your pet monkeys name??
dude WTF?

kzrider;206220 wrote:
Just my opinion, LS serious rocks. A boosted large cube engine over ur boosted I6 any day.

What is your pet monkeys name??

bubba;206060 wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong but wouldnt that happen with most any cars...I think that's why some of the racecars use a dry sump system...

Certainly but most "stock" cars cant pull the g's that an R34 can. The ones that can are all built for it, ie Porsche, Lotus, Ferrari, Corvette, etc. etc.

capitlj;205993 wrote:
Under high G's the stock motor's sump can go dry, from what I have read. I don't have one in the garage to back that up but I have read it in a few places.

Correct me if I'm wrong but wouldnt that happen with most any cars...I think that's why some of the racecars use a dry sump system...

KA-T_240;205800 wrote:
What about a R34??? You mean that R33

There should be no oiling problems with the RB motors, unless it was not put together right. The RB26 stock bottom end has been proven to make 600whp+

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6G1X7aA7B4

Under high G's the stock motor's sump can go dry, from what I have read. I don't have one in the garage to back that up but I have read it in a few places.

JN210;205820 wrote:
psh....while we are all dreaming big....why not just throw a Lamborghini engine in it?

Their mullets won't allow them to...