<![CDATA[component video]]>hey does anybody know if component video really that much better than s video on a 20 in flat tube screen? just curious because my tv is 160 bucks and it has component inputs for them.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/1341/component-videoRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 01:19:05 GMTTue, 18 Jan 2005 05:19:17 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to component video on Wed, 19 Jan 2005 03:46:23 GMT]]>I just remember screwing around at wal-mart and hooking it up and being quite pleased with the picture quality over coaxial.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/24998https://fargostreet.com/post/24998Wed, 19 Jan 2005 03:46:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to component video on Wed, 19 Jan 2005 02:20:51 GMT]]>the microsoft brand of component cable is only like 20-25...monster brand is way more

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/24982https://fargostreet.com/post/24982Wed, 19 Jan 2005 02:20:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to component video on Wed, 19 Jan 2005 02:11:58 GMT]]>i just checked out how much component cable would cost for my xbox and its 60 bucks. thats a lot compared to s-video. Anways i think im going component since i can probably use it for another tv if i decide to upgrade later on.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/24981https://fargostreet.com/post/24981Wed, 19 Jan 2005 02:11:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to component video on Tue, 18 Jan 2005 14:49:32 GMT]]>http://www.michaeldvd.com.au/Articles/VideoConnectors/VideoConnectors.asp

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/24895https://fargostreet.com/post/24895Tue, 18 Jan 2005 14:49:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to component video on Tue, 18 Jan 2005 14:37:04 GMT]]>it separates the colors into 3 different feeds, instead of just one. Its like the big overhead projectors you see that spit out 3 colors, red green and blue (I think). I have it coming from my DVD player into my TV. I have never noticed a problem, or a real difference, but I have never used regular hook up with this tv either, so I dont know if there is

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/24893https://fargostreet.com/post/24893Tue, 18 Jan 2005 14:37:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to component video on Tue, 18 Jan 2005 12:02:00 GMT]]>

amicheze wrote:
component video as in normal rca's? i always thought s-video was supposed to be all digital and a lot better.. but maybe im wrong.

normal rcas are known as composite video...think about it tho 3 plugs instead of one for just video...of course its gonna be better...but s-video is better than composite tho

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/24880https://fargostreet.com/post/24880Tue, 18 Jan 2005 12:02:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to component video on Tue, 18 Jan 2005 06:52:26 GMT]]>your not going to notice unless the screen resolution can support it.

svideo is fairly good quality, the component video will start to show up on the larger monitors 20 inch is fairly small when talking about things that equipped with component video

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/24855https://fargostreet.com/post/24855Tue, 18 Jan 2005 06:52:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to component video on Tue, 18 Jan 2005 06:22:35 GMT]]>Component is the highest quality you can get for most televisions. I would definitely go with it.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/24849https://fargostreet.com/post/24849Tue, 18 Jan 2005 06:22:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to component video on Tue, 18 Jan 2005 06:20:11 GMT]]>component video as in normal rca's? i always thought s-video was supposed to be all digital and a lot better.. but maybe im wrong.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/24847https://fargostreet.com/post/24847Tue, 18 Jan 2005 06:20:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to component video on Tue, 18 Jan 2005 05:26:56 GMT]]>yeah probably

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/24842https://fargostreet.com/post/24842Tue, 18 Jan 2005 05:26:56 GMT