<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[The Negative Effects of Low Exhaust Backpressure]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a href="http://www.flowmastermufflers.com/backpressure.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.flowmastermufflers.com/backpressure.html</a></p>
<p dir="auto">i learneded sumpthin!</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/topic/13580/the-negative-effects-of-low-exhaust-backpressure</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 14:36:11 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://fargostreet.com/topic/13580.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:53:37 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The Negative Effects of Low Exhaust Backpressure on Fri, 28 Mar 2008 23:27:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">camzaro28;211746 wrote:<br />
Your taking info from flowmaster, the most restrictive muffler out there. It didnt get the name chokemaster for nuttin</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">He speaks...</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/200456</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/200456</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 23:27:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The Negative Effects of Low Exhaust Backpressure on Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:34:48 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">camzaro28;211746 wrote:<br />
Your taking info from flowmaster, the most restrictive muffler out there. It didnt get the name chokemaster for nuttin</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">and sound like poo</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/200433</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/200433</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[zbrown]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:34:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The Negative Effects of Low Exhaust Backpressure on Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:48:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Your taking info from flowmaster, the most restrictive muffler out there. It didnt get the name chokemaster for nuttin</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/200429</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/200429</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[camzaro28]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:48:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The Negative Effects of Low Exhaust Backpressure on Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:22:10 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">KA-T_240;211727 wrote:<br />
I beg to differ on some stuff. On a diesel, a good none restrictive exhuast lowers EGT, instead of increasing like stated in that link.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">holy faber.............lol, your just thinking of the oldschool NA 6.2's right?? <img src="https://fargostreet.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f642.png?v=9255230f466" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--slightly_smiling_face" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":)" alt="🙂" /></p>
<p dir="auto">on any turbo setup the least amount of post turbine pressure is ideal...............Drive pressure gets deep <img src="https://fargostreet.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f642.png?v=9255230f466" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--slightly_smiling_face" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":)" alt="🙂" /> but you want that as low as possible while still supporting the characeristcs you want of the sysem</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/200426</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/200426</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[zbrown]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:22:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The Negative Effects of Low Exhaust Backpressure on Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:35:24 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">From some of the stuff i've read other places, the best was the higher the exhaust velocity...meaning what gets the exhaust out of the end of the pipe quickest. Which can kinda explain least amount of bends possible, the least restriction possible, and the proper sizing, not too big or too small of piping...</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/200421</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/200421</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[bubba]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:35:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The Negative Effects of Low Exhaust Backpressure on Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:11:01 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">KA-T_240;211727 wrote:<br />
I beg to differ on some stuff. On a diesel, a good none restrictive exhuast lowers EGT, instead of increasing like stated in that link.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">That would be correct because it is a diesel and it has forced induction.  The article was talking about N/A gas motors.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/200418</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/200418</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[MisterCMK]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:11:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The Negative Effects of Low Exhaust Backpressure on Fri, 28 Mar 2008 14:12:55 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">There is a reason why NA civics do not need a 3 inch exhaust, other then they are stupid loud, and sound like ass.</p>
<p dir="auto">I beg to differ on some stuff. On a diesel, a good none restrictive exhuast lowers EGT, instead of increasing like stated in that link.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/200410</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/200410</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[KA-T_240]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 14:12:55 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>