<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Ford Truck Recall...]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Bad brake lines or something...</p>
<p dir="auto"><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24619177" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24619177</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/topic/14038/ford-truck-recall...</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 01:17:20 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://fargostreet.com/topic/14038.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 20:36:22 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Ford Truck Recall... on Fri, 23 May 2008 03:38:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I've already had several people in for this problem.</p>
<p dir="auto">Apparently they'll be reimbursed for the previous repair.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/208527</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/208527</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Erik]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 03:38:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Ford Truck Recall... on Thu, 22 May 2008 20:15:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">kylush;219849 wrote:<br />
This exact same thing happened to our 05 F-250 work truck last summer. Just cruising around and all the sudden the peddle was just like rock hard and you had to freakin stand on it to get any stopping power at all. Kinda scary...</p>
<p dir="auto">Course that thing had lots of problems, two injectors, fuel pump, and the transmission all had gone out on it by the time it had 30,000 miles on it</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Was that a diesel or a gasser?</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/208481</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/208481</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[MisterCMK]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 20:15:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Ford Truck Recall... on Thu, 22 May 2008 17:10:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Parker;219801 wrote:<br />
Defect Summary:<br />
FORD IS RECALLING 605,684 MY 2005-2006 F-150 AND LINCOLN MARK LT VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH 5.4L 3-VALVE ENGINES. THE BRAKE BOOSTER VACUUM SUPPLY HOSE ATTACHED TO THE INTAKE MANIFOLD FITTING MAY SWELL OVER TIME AND LOSE RETENTION FORCE. THIS CONDITION COULD ALLOW THE HOSE TO BECOME DETACHED FROM THE FITTING DURING AN INTAKE MANIFOLD BACKFIRE. SHOULD THE HOSE DETACH FROM THE INTAKE MANIFOLD, SEVERAL BRAKE APPLICATIONS WITH POWER ASSIST WILL BE AVAILABLE BEFORE THE VACUUM RESERVE IS DEPLETED.<br />
Consequence Summary:<br />
ONCE THE BRAKE BOOSTER VACUUM RESERVE IS DEPLETED, THE DRIVER WILL HAVE FOUNDATION BRAKE FUNCTION, BUT WITH INCREASED BRAKE PEDAL EFFORT. REDUCED VEHICLE BRAKING COULD LEAD TO A CRASH.<br />
Corrective Action:<br />
DEALERS WILL REPLACE A RUBBER HOSE ON THE BRAKE BOOSTER VACUUM SUPPLY TUBE ASSEMBLY. THE RECALL IS EXPECTED TO BEGIN ON OR ABOUT JULY 7, 2008. OWNERS MAY CONTACT FORD AT 1-800-392-3673.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">This exact same thing happened to our 05 F-250 work truck last summer. Just cruising around and all the sudden the peddle was just like rock hard and you had to freakin stand on it to get any stopping power at all. Kinda scary...</p>
<p dir="auto">Course that thing had lots of problems, two injectors, fuel pump, and the transmission all had gone out on it by the time it had 30,000 miles on it</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/208473</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/208473</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[kylush]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 17:10:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Ford Truck Recall... on Thu, 22 May 2008 16:33:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Looks like they have another recall....projected profits.  <img src="https://fargostreet.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f642.png?v=40430adaedb" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--slightly_smiling_face" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":)" alt="🙂" />  Poor Ford...</p>
<p dir="auto"><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24773925" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24773925</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/208466</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/208466</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[SmitEvo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 16:33:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Ford Truck Recall... on Thu, 22 May 2008 16:00:26 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">MisterCMK;219829 wrote:<br />
So how is a vacuum booster hose a bad brake line?</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">It isnt...it was the "or something".</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/208461</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/208461</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[SmitEvo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 16:00:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Ford Truck Recall... on Thu, 22 May 2008 15:20:00 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">SmitEvo;218920 wrote:<br />
Bad brake lines or something...</p>
<p dir="auto"><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24619177" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24619177</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">So how is a vacuum booster hose a bad brake line?</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/208456</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/208456</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[MisterCMK]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 15:20:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Ford Truck Recall... on Thu, 22 May 2008 15:19:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Parker;219802 wrote:<br />
yup, and owned by people that hate us.... and fueled by people that want us to convert or die....</p>
<p dir="auto">lol</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">You dick, you ruined the suspense by posting the recall info</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/208455</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/208455</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[MisterCMK]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 15:19:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Ford Truck Recall... on Thu, 22 May 2008 07:54:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">tjamz;219752 wrote:<br />
Hence the reason I buy Toyota....made here by American workers.<br />
yup, and owned by people that hate us.... and fueled by people that want us to convert or die....</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">lol</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/208429</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/208429</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Parker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 07:54:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Ford Truck Recall... on Thu, 22 May 2008 07:49:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Defect Summary:<br />
FORD IS RECALLING 605,684 MY 2005-2006 F-150 AND LINCOLN MARK LT VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH 5.4L 3-VALVE ENGINES. THE BRAKE BOOSTER VACUUM SUPPLY HOSE ATTACHED TO THE INTAKE MANIFOLD FITTING MAY SWELL OVER TIME AND LOSE RETENTION FORCE. THIS CONDITION COULD ALLOW THE HOSE TO BECOME DETACHED FROM THE FITTING DURING AN INTAKE MANIFOLD BACKFIRE. SHOULD THE HOSE DETACH FROM THE INTAKE MANIFOLD, SEVERAL BRAKE APPLICATIONS WITH POWER ASSIST WILL BE AVAILABLE BEFORE THE VACUUM RESERVE IS DEPLETED.<br />
Consequence Summary:<br />
ONCE THE BRAKE BOOSTER VACUUM RESERVE IS DEPLETED, THE DRIVER WILL HAVE FOUNDATION BRAKE FUNCTION, BUT WITH INCREASED BRAKE PEDAL EFFORT. REDUCED VEHICLE BRAKING COULD LEAD TO A CRASH.<br />
Corrective Action:<br />
DEALERS WILL REPLACE A RUBBER HOSE ON THE BRAKE BOOSTER VACUUM SUPPLY TUBE ASSEMBLY. THE RECALL IS EXPECTED TO BEGIN ON OR ABOUT JULY 7, 2008. OWNERS MAY CONTACT FORD AT 1-800-392-3673.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/208428</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/208428</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Parker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 07:49:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Ford Truck Recall... on Thu, 22 May 2008 04:47:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">...or it took you seven days to figure that out. <img src="https://fargostreet.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f642.png?v=40430adaedb" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--slightly_smiling_face" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":)" alt="🙂" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/208404</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/208404</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[SmitEvo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 04:47:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Ford Truck Recall... on Thu, 22 May 2008 03:50:26 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Oh and I am sure that none of you bothered to look into what hose it is that is recalled.  It is not a brake line....</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/208385</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/208385</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[MisterCMK]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 03:50:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Ford Truck Recall... on Thu, 22 May 2008 03:48:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">'tis always open season on terrorists...</p>
<p dir="auto">No bag limit either...</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/208383</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/208383</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[MisterCMK]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 03:48:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Ford Truck Recall... on Thu, 22 May 2008 03:26:04 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hence the reason I buy Toyota....made here by American workers.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/208379</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/208379</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[[[global:guest]]]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 03:26:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Ford Truck Recall... on Thu, 22 May 2008 03:12:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">this thread is weaksauce..... "toyota is the best". "no, ford is". "no, toyota"..... blah blah blah blah blah.... IMO... if you dont buy american.... your a terrorist... lol</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/208377</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/208377</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Parker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 03:12:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Ford Truck Recall... on Wed, 21 May 2008 15:57:26 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I'm not a Toyota worshiper either.  They make mistakes like everyone else.  I've owned at least one new vehicle from each major manufacturers (Toyota, Chevy, Dodge, Ford, Nissan, Subaru) except for Honda.  As far as customer service goes with them, the order that MY experiences have been is the following:</p>
<p dir="auto">Toyota&gt;Nissan&gt;/=Subaru&gt;Chevy&gt;Ford&gt;Dodge</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/208293</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/208293</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[[[global:guest]]]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 15:57:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Ford Truck Recall... on Wed, 21 May 2008 15:33:53 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I am not a Toyota hater...I just don't worship them like a few people on here.  I like the looks of the GMC pickup the best.  I don't like the look of the Tundra, but that wouldn't keep me from considering it if I was in the market for a new truck.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/208291</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/208291</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[91nbtsi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 15:33:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Ford Truck Recall... on Wed, 21 May 2008 13:22:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">The toyota grill / front in general looks like a smashed up bulldog face lol.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/208286</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/208286</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[JN210]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 13:22:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Ford Truck Recall... on Wed, 21 May 2008 12:37:37 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">the grill on the Toyota is the uglyest part of the truck...if they could change that then they would have a sharp looking truck</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/208283</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/208283</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Raider]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 12:37:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Ford Truck Recall... on Tue, 20 May 2008 21:39:55 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">capitlj;219546 wrote:<br />
I'm not a Toyota hater I just don't like the truck,</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Fair enough</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">its ugly,</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Personal opinion of course...I thought it was the best looking on the road</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">and I do not feel that their product is that much better than what is made here.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Product...maybe not, service...DEFINITELY BETTER than the Big 3...thereby making the product better in my eyes.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">For the record I also don't like the way the new Chevy, Dodge, Ford, Nissan, and especially Honda, trucks look either.  IMO the Ford is by far the best looking one and its still nothing special.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Again, personal choice...though I think the Ford/Toyota look similar:</p>
<p dir="auto"><img src="http://www.cardata.com/images/2008_new_cars/Ford/2008_Ford_F-150_XLT.jpg" alt="legacy image" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
<p dir="auto"><img src="http://image.automotive.com/f/miscellaneous/toyota-hopes-13-is-lucky-number-for-all-new-tundra/7197791+w640+cr1+re0+ar1/2008-toyota-tundra-crewmax-front-right.jpg" alt="legacy image" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/208181</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/208181</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[[[global:guest]]]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 21:39:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Ford Truck Recall... on Tue, 20 May 2008 19:52:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I'm not a Toyota hater I just don't like the truck, its ugly, and I do not feel that their product is that much better than what is made here.  For the record I also don't like the way the new Chevy, Dodge, Ford, Nissan, and especially Honda, trucks look either.  IMO the Ford is by far the best looking one and its still nothing special.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/208173</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/208173</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[capitlj]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 19:52:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Ford Truck Recall... on Mon, 19 May 2008 23:15:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Let's see Ford buy back truck that fall apart.  Wait, they can't because they don't have any money to do that.  Didn't they almost go under a few times already?</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/208071</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/208071</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[treimche]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 23:15:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Ford Truck Recall... on Sat, 17 May 2008 16:37:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">^^^^same here^^^^</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/207881</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/207881</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[darkelvis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 16:37:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Ford Truck Recall... on Fri, 16 May 2008 16:16:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Raider;219108 wrote:<br />
all manufactors copy each other...when I graduated from Ford ASSET we went to Derborn and was able to tour Ford's testing plant and they had a clean room that they were taking a Toyota and a Chevy a part piece by piece to compare them</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">I know this.  It's smart business to do so.  I just wanted a little retribution vs. the toyota haters.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/207761</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/207761</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[[[global:guest]]]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 16:16:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Ford Truck Recall... on Fri, 16 May 2008 13:45:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">all manufactors copy each other...when I graduated from Ford ASSET we went to Derborn and was able to tour Ford's testing plant and they had a clean room that they were taking a Toyota and a Chevy a part piece by piece to compare them</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/207739</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/207739</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Raider]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 13:45:08 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>