<![CDATA[rotarys what??]]>ha..

proof it lives, and lives well

kinda shitty quality, luke couldn't get the dvd cam to work

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vdw3yXMxb0E&feature=user

edit.... i mispelled the title, I suck at life, yes

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/14273/rotarys-whatRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 19:58:29 GMTThu, 12 Jun 2008 03:56:06 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to rotarys what?? on Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:51:07 GMT]]>

Afsil80;222510 wrote:
The REAL question:

How many N/A rear ends will you go through before you decide to go with something different? 😉
hopefuly none

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/211140https://fargostreet.com/post/211140Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:51:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to rotarys what?? on Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:42:06 GMT]]>The REAL question:

How many N/A rear ends will you go through before you decide to go with something different? 😉

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/211118https://fargostreet.com/post/211118Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:42:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to rotarys what?? on Mon, 16 Jun 2008 06:04:15 GMT]]>

z31;222418 wrote:
That is not a solid rear axle, unless it's bent. :icon_scratch:

IRS can hold a lot of power. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mf4R0Ba_zHQ
lol... that does not look like an rx7 with a 7'' ring gear...

and yes... the rear looks like its cambering in... if you compare it to the <u>front, that is about ready to lift</u>... but prove me wrong.. run a 9 second pass on a 7'' ring gear and shut me up:icon_cheers:

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/211091https://fargostreet.com/post/211091Mon, 16 Jun 2008 06:04:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to rotarys what?? on Mon, 16 Jun 2008 00:29:42 GMT]]>That is not a solid rear axle, unless it's bent. :icon_scratch:

IRS can hold a lot of power. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mf4R0Ba_zHQ

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/211029https://fargostreet.com/post/211029Mon, 16 Jun 2008 00:29:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to rotarys what?? on Sat, 14 Jun 2008 23:11:59 GMT]]>

weshole;222309 wrote:
Speaking of N00bs, it's not "toe" that your looking at there is camber my friend. And it is definately showing negative camber. Indicative of an independent rear suspension.

thanks for keeping me in line 🙂

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/210953https://fargostreet.com/post/210953Sat, 14 Jun 2008 23:11:59 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to rotarys what?? on Sat, 14 Jun 2008 18:58:02 GMT]]>

zbrown;222307 wrote:
hmmmm...

looks to me like the wheels are toed in big time........ how does that happen on a solid axe....

parker = noob

and that car DID do a 9.40 @ 142 on a stock TII rear, halfshafts, and suspension.....

it is backhalved now yes
lol... thats katorx7's car (v8rx7forum)... and that pass in the picture was done on a granny's solid axle kit.. you are basing the front to the rear... just looks like a solid axle too me..

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/210940https://fargostreet.com/post/210940Sat, 14 Jun 2008 18:58:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to rotarys what?? on Sat, 14 Jun 2008 17:57:56 GMT]]>+1 for slow sauce haha jk

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/210938https://fargostreet.com/post/210938Sat, 14 Jun 2008 17:57:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to rotarys what?? on Sat, 14 Jun 2008 13:55:21 GMT]]>

weshole;222309 wrote:
Speaking of N00bs, it's not "toe" that your looking at there is camber my friend. And it is definately showing negative camber.

pwnd

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/210930https://fargostreet.com/post/210930Sat, 14 Jun 2008 13:55:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to rotarys what?? on Sat, 14 Jun 2008 13:50:36 GMT]]>

zbrown;222307 wrote:
hmmmm...

looks to me like the wheels are toed in big time........ how does that happen on a solid axe....

parker = noob

and that car DID do a 9.40 @ 142 on a stock TII rear, halfshafts, and suspension.....

it is backhalved now yes

Speaking of N00bs, it's not "toe" that your looking at there is camber my friend. And it is definately showing negative camber. Indicative of an independent rear suspension.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/210927https://fargostreet.com/post/210927Sat, 14 Jun 2008 13:50:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to rotarys what?? on Sat, 14 Jun 2008 13:11:29 GMT]]>

Parker;222299 wrote:
lol... thats the solid axle under that... n00b..

hmmmm...

looks to me like the wheels are toed in big time........ how does that happen on a solid axe....

parker = noob

and that car DID do a 9.40 @ 142 on a stock TII rear, halfshafts, and suspension.....

it is backhalved now yes

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/210925https://fargostreet.com/post/210925Sat, 14 Jun 2008 13:11:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to rotarys what?? on Sat, 14 Jun 2008 07:05:07 GMT]]>

squawsnatch;222296 wrote:
zac..................if only the noobs knew what the stock na rear end was capable of.
lol @ u.... im pretty sure i of all people here knows what the staock n/a rear diff is good too... its good to the tens, yes... But... wheel hop is the enemy in most cases

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/210918https://fargostreet.com/post/210918Sat, 14 Jun 2008 07:05:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to rotarys what?? on Sat, 14 Jun 2008 07:03:43 GMT]]>

zbrown;222297 wrote:
9.4 @ 140+???

legacy image
.
.
.
.
.
.
I fibbed a bit, that was completely stock TII diff, axles, suspension....

I know of NA rears in low 10s though
lol... thats the solid axle under that... n00b..

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/210917https://fargostreet.com/post/210917Sat, 14 Jun 2008 07:03:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to rotarys what?? on Sat, 14 Jun 2008 05:51:12 GMT]]>

squawsnatch;222296 wrote:
zac..................if only the noobs knew what the stock na rear end was capable of.

9.4 @ 140+???

legacy image
.
.
.
.
.
.
I fibbed a bit, that was completely stock TII diff, axles, suspension....

I know of NA rears in low 10s though

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/210915https://fargostreet.com/post/210915Sat, 14 Jun 2008 05:51:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to rotarys what?? on Sat, 14 Jun 2008 05:31:41 GMT]]>zac..................if only the noobs knew what the stock na rear end was capable of.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/210914https://fargostreet.com/post/210914Sat, 14 Jun 2008 05:31:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to rotarys what?? on Fri, 13 Jun 2008 15:33:50 GMT]]>ford 8.8'' or 9''

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/210849https://fargostreet.com/post/210849Fri, 13 Jun 2008 15:33:50 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to rotarys what?? on Fri, 13 Jun 2008 15:31:25 GMT]]>what are you going to replace it with?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/210848https://fargostreet.com/post/210848Fri, 13 Jun 2008 15:31:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to rotarys what?? on Fri, 13 Jun 2008 15:24:53 GMT]]>

slow90gsx;222223 wrote:
how long till thats laying on the ground in pieces.......
all it takes is for the car to wheel hop once.... then kaboom....

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/210847https://fargostreet.com/post/210847Fri, 13 Jun 2008 15:24:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to rotarys what?? on Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:11:47 GMT]]>

slow90gsx;222223 wrote:
how long till thats laying on the ground in pieces.......

16 1/2 Feet

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/210842https://fargostreet.com/post/210842Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:11:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to rotarys what?? on Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:10:08 GMT]]>how long till thats laying on the ground in pieces.......

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/210841https://fargostreet.com/post/210841Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:10:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to rotarys what?? on Fri, 13 Jun 2008 04:33:41 GMT]]>stock 7'' ring gear....

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/210805https://fargostreet.com/post/210805Fri, 13 Jun 2008 04:33:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to rotarys what?? on Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:47:09 GMT]]>I think i missed what rear end are you using.......

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/210710https://fargostreet.com/post/210710Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:47:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to rotarys what?? on Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:08:22 GMT]]>

squawsnatch;222053 wrote:
........then hot girl showed up.
pics?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/210700https://fargostreet.com/post/210700Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:08:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to rotarys what?? on Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:15:51 GMT]]>...... weaksauce

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/210696https://fargostreet.com/post/210696Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:15:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to rotarys what?? on Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:50:52 GMT]]>How does it run compared to the turbo?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/210692https://fargostreet.com/post/210692Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:50:52 GMT