<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Rules In Favor of Gun Owners]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSWBT00928420080626?feedType=RSS&amp;feedName=topNews&amp;rpc=22&amp;sp=true" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSWBT00928420080626?feedType=RSS&amp;feedName=topNews&amp;rpc=22&amp;sp=true</a></p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Thursday, for the first time in the nation's history, that individual Americans have the right to own guns for personal use, and struck down a strict gun control law in the nation's capital.</p>
<p dir="auto">The landmark 5-4 ruling marked the first time in nearly 70 years that the high court has addressed whether the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects an individual right to keep and bear arms, rather than a right tied to service in a state militia.</p>
<p dir="auto">(Reporting by James Vicini, Editing by Deborah Charles)</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Thank God!</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/topic/14395/supreme-court-rules-in-favor-of-gun-owners</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 10:46:42 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://fargostreet.com/topic/14395.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:39:07 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Supreme Court Rules In Favor of Gun Owners on Fri, 27 Jun 2008 22:02:57 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">ok, i did leave out a few steps, but my point is that a series of investigations was started because of something trivial.  lying under oath happened as a result of pursuing these investigations.  presidential secrecy has been something huge throughout this country's history, do some googling on it.  rarely has it resulted in the kind of knee-jerk reactions that clinton's behavior did</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/212634</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/212634</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[out there]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 22:02:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Supreme Court Rules In Favor of Gun Owners on Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:52:19 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Its very nice to see a ruling in favor of the 2nd amendment</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/212561</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/212561</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[bubba]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:52:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Supreme Court Rules In Favor of Gun Owners on Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:39:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">clinton was found to have lied under oath.  what he lied about was disagreeable to lost of Americans, but the impeachable offense was lying under oath.  That's perjury.  It's a big deal.</p>
<p dir="auto">There are plenty of people who chant "bush lied, people died", etc etc.  That very well may be the case.  If he is put on trial and commits purjury during the trial, at that point he'll have commited the same offense that got Clinton in legal hot water (which is different from "popularity" hot water)</p>
<p dir="auto">I'm no fan of Bush, but anecdotes and bitterness don't move the country forward.  Focus on what is factual and objective.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/212559</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/212559</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[thrash]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:39:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Supreme Court Rules In Favor of Gun Owners on Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:18:40 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">out there;223946 wrote:<br />
you must be new here.  for the last seven years, we've had a president that has used the constitution as a doormat.  it's ridiculous the kind of crap that happens and there are no consequences.  clinton lies about sexual acts in the white house and an impeachment was the result.  bush undermines the bedrock of the country and makes us the joke of the world... and what happens?</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Good thing the Democratic Congress has fixed everything they said they would! Whew!</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/212553</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/212553</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[StangerBanger96]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:18:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Supreme Court Rules In Favor of Gun Owners on Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:11:26 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">you must be new here.  for the last seven years, we've had a president that has used the constitution as a doormat.  it's ridiculous the kind of crap that happens and there are no consequences.  clinton lies about sexual acts in the white house and an impeachment was the result.  bush undermines the bedrock of the country and makes us the joke of the world... and what happens?</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/212552</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/212552</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[out there]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:11:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Supreme Court Rules In Favor of Gun Owners on Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:48:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">zbrown;223932 wrote:<br />
speak for yourselves..... It scares me that 4 justices voted to perty much remove the second amendment from the bench....</p>
<p dir="auto">Should have been a unanimous decision at the very least and never should have made it to the supreme court</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">have to say, scares the shit out of me too.</p>
<p dir="auto">[sarcasm]Let's just burn the constitution already so we can completely control everything a person does or thinks.[/sarcasm] <img src="https://fargostreet.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f615.png?v=40430adaedb" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--confused" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":confused:" alt="😕" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/212549</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/212549</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[TurboGTU]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:48:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Supreme Court Rules In Favor of Gun Owners on Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:40:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">zbrown;223932 wrote:<br />
speak for yourselves..... It scares me that 4 justices voted to perty much remove the second amendment from the bench....</p>
<p dir="auto">Should have been a unanimous decision at the very least and never should have made it to the supreme court</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">integra_gsr98;223933 wrote:<br />
Yep.  Now imagine if for the last 8 years conservative justices were not put on the bench.  The liberals would have stripped the 2nd amendment straight out of the constitution.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Exactly. Thank God it was ruled on now, and sets a precedent for any future attempts though.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/212543</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/212543</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[StangerBanger96]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:40:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Supreme Court Rules In Favor of Gun Owners on Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:03:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Yep.  Now imagine if for the last 8 years conservative justices were not put on the bench.  The liberals would have stripped the 2nd amendment straight out of the constitution.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/212539</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/212539</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[integra_gsr98]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:03:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Supreme Court Rules In Favor of Gun Owners on Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:49:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">speak for yourselves..... It scares me that 4 justices voted to perty much remove the second amendment from the bench....</p>
<p dir="auto">Should have been a unanimous decision at the very least and never should have made it to the supreme court</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/212538</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/212538</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[zbrown]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:49:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Supreme Court Rules In Favor of Gun Owners on Fri, 27 Jun 2008 08:28:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">hmmm... maybe this country stands a chance of not reaching full "soviet" status</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/212530</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/212530</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[out there]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 08:28:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Supreme Court Rules In Favor of Gun Owners on Fri, 27 Jun 2008 03:07:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">heard it on the radio, made my day.  I was worried as shit about this decision when they announced they'd be "deciding" on it a couple months back.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/212480</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/212480</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[harm]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 03:07:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Supreme Court Rules In Favor of Gun Owners on Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:52:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">holla holla holla</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/212449</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/212449</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[SPANISH-RICE]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:52:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Supreme Court Rules In Favor of Gun Owners on Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:41:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">w00t!</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/212443</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/212443</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Link]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:41:36 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>