<![CDATA[2009 Challenger!!!!!!!!!!!!!!]]>Hey Everyone The New 2009 Dodge Challenger Is In!!! Stop Into Corwin Chrysler Dodge To View!!!!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/14816/2009-challengerRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 02:05:19 GMTTue, 12 Aug 2008 19:30:50 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to 2009 Challenger!!!!!!!!!!!!!! on Tue, 14 Oct 2008 23:20:26 GMT]]>top notch.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/230261https://fargostreet.com/post/230261Tue, 14 Oct 2008 23:20:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 2009 Challenger!!!!!!!!!!!!!! on Tue, 14 Oct 2008 23:17:00 GMT]]>

Briggs&Stratton;241751 wrote:
http://www.local10.com/news/17704542/detail.html

and it refers to it as a sports car. Cars with a rear seat are considered a sports car?

... Burst in to flames. Sounds like quality!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/230260https://fargostreet.com/post/230260Tue, 14 Oct 2008 23:17:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 2009 Challenger!!!!!!!!!!!!!! on Tue, 14 Oct 2008 22:58:57 GMT]]>http://www.local10.com/news/17704542/detail.html

and it refers to it as a sports car. Cars with a rear seat are considered a sports car?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/230255https://fargostreet.com/post/230255Tue, 14 Oct 2008 22:58:57 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 2009 Challenger!!!!!!!!!!!!!! on Mon, 13 Oct 2008 23:26:39 GMT]]>

00Accord;241254 wrote:
4 years ago they shouldn't have raped the name "Charger" and done that shit right.

+1 its a good car, but Intrepid would have fit just fine.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/229995https://fargostreet.com/post/229995Mon, 13 Oct 2008 23:26:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 2009 Challenger!!!!!!!!!!!!!! on Mon, 13 Oct 2008 02:29:00 GMT]]>4 years ago they shouldn't have raped the name "Charger" and done that shit right.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/229758https://fargostreet.com/post/229758Mon, 13 Oct 2008 02:29:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 2009 Challenger!!!!!!!!!!!!!! on Mon, 13 Oct 2008 02:06:38 GMT]]>Gotta say I'm not that impressed with the new Challenger. I like the car, especially the aesthetic, but it kinda feels like it should have been built 4 years ago.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/229754https://fargostreet.com/post/229754Mon, 13 Oct 2008 02:06:38 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 2009 Challenger!!!!!!!!!!!!!! on Sat, 11 Oct 2008 22:13:21 GMT]]>So when is the big old circle jerk over the Challenger? I want in.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/229554https://fargostreet.com/post/229554Sat, 11 Oct 2008 22:13:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 2009 Challenger!!!!!!!!!!!!!! on Sat, 11 Oct 2008 19:39:51 GMT]]>

bubba;241003 wrote:
Yep.. that's why u mod a used car so u have half the money into it and out perform some silly new car... but that's just how i see things...

Agreed.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/229535https://fargostreet.com/post/229535Sat, 11 Oct 2008 19:39:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 2009 Challenger!!!!!!!!!!!!!! on Sat, 11 Oct 2008 15:47:17 GMT]]>

Briggs&Stratton;240963 wrote:
yep, you are right. Almost 1% of the makes and models produced in america are capable of what the challenger is. 1%, thats pretty much everything, right? Challenger? bah....sigh....awfully pedestrian in its accomplishments.

Yep.. that's why u mod a used car so u have half the money into it and out perform some silly new car... but that's just how i see things...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/229507https://fargostreet.com/post/229507Sat, 11 Oct 2008 15:47:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 2009 Challenger!!!!!!!!!!!!!! on Sat, 11 Oct 2008 05:12:45 GMT]]>

KA-T_240;240958 wrote:
Corvettes do 170, SRT4 Neons do 160, and there are more.....

yep, you are right. Almost 1% of the makes and models produced in america are capable of what the challenger is. 1%, thats pretty much everything, right? Challenger? bah....sigh....awfully pedestrian in its accomplishments.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/229468https://fargostreet.com/post/229468Sat, 11 Oct 2008 05:12:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 2009 Challenger!!!!!!!!!!!!!! on Sat, 11 Oct 2008 04:52:11 GMT]]>Corvettes do 170, SRT4 Neons do 160, and there are more.....

CMK, I like your change!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/229463https://fargostreet.com/post/229463Sat, 11 Oct 2008 04:52:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 2009 Challenger!!!!!!!!!!!!!! on Sat, 11 Oct 2008 04:32:38 GMT]]>

bubba;240940 wrote:
wow... pretty sure i've been in a certain members 4cyl (dont remember the exact size but started as a 2.4) at close to those speeds... and in hondas that produce that hp...

thats nothing. I have a 3406B cat that has the same hp stock, and will do those speeds with some extreme gear ratio changing and maybe a double OD tranny. haha. But that wasnt my point with the OG post.

I think 170 is pretty fast for an out of the box production american car. And the same with 425 horse.

although you pretty much wont ever find me chasing a new anything unless its GM.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/229458https://fargostreet.com/post/229458Sat, 11 Oct 2008 04:32:38 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 2009 Challenger!!!!!!!!!!!!!! on Sat, 11 Oct 2008 03:28:35 GMT]]>

Briggs&Stratton;240933 wrote:
sorry to get back on topic lol, but I just saw a thing SPEED at el mirage and they got one to go 170 mph, it had a 5.7 and stated 425 hp. Just thought i'd add that.

wow... pretty sure i've been in a certain members 4cyl (dont remember the exact size but started as a 2.4) at close to those speeds... and in hondas that produce that hp...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/229445https://fargostreet.com/post/229445Sat, 11 Oct 2008 03:28:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 2009 Challenger!!!!!!!!!!!!!! on Sat, 11 Oct 2008 02:41:20 GMT]]>sorry to get back on topic lol, but I just saw a thing SPEED at el mirage and they got one to go 170 mph, it had a 5.7 and stated 425 hp. Just thought i'd add that.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/229438https://fargostreet.com/post/229438Sat, 11 Oct 2008 02:41:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 2009 Challenger!!!!!!!!!!!!!! on Sat, 11 Oct 2008 01:36:38 GMT]]>

KA-T_240;240920 wrote:
If I was going to buy any vehicle, it would not be from Corwin.....

fix.t

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/229428https://fargostreet.com/post/229428Sat, 11 Oct 2008 01:36:38 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 2009 Challenger!!!!!!!!!!!!!! on Sat, 11 Oct 2008 01:22:15 GMT]]>If I was going to buy a Challenger, it would not be from Corwin.....

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/229425https://fargostreet.com/post/229425Sat, 11 Oct 2008 01:22:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 2009 Challenger!!!!!!!!!!!!!! on Fri, 10 Oct 2008 18:24:14 GMT]]>V6 would be horrible in those things

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/229388https://fargostreet.com/post/229388Fri, 10 Oct 2008 18:24:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 2009 Challenger!!!!!!!!!!!!!! on Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:21:55 GMT]]>Pretty much, aside from that fact that challengers are ugly as fuck

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/229374https://fargostreet.com/post/229374Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:21:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 2009 Challenger!!!!!!!!!!!!!! on Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:08:20 GMT]]>We dont care what ur dealership has and ur trying to sell... kthxbye

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/229366https://fargostreet.com/post/229366Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:08:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 2009 Challenger!!!!!!!!!!!!!! on Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:37:29 GMT]]>the 08 were limited to 6400 all numbered and all srt8 with autostick...the 09's are now available with the 3.5 v6, 5.7 v8(5speed autostick or 6 speed manual) or the 6.1 v8 srt8(autostick or manual) also all the 08's that you saw come through were sold way before they were even in production...the one we have right now is a 5.7 v8 rt model with 370 hp and 383 lb-ft torque...it's the first rt in the midwest to be delievered but now 3 other dealers just got them in to

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/229351https://fargostreet.com/post/229351Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:37:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 2009 Challenger!!!!!!!!!!!!!! on Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:26:24 GMT]]>

D S ohM;231965 wrote:
Pretty sure I said ROUGHLY 8000. I didn't say exactly. But otherwise, thanks for the useless info.

OOO OOO go ohm go ohm haha
:icon_cheers:

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/220902https://fargostreet.com/post/220902Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:26:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 2009 Challenger!!!!!!!!!!!!!! on Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:12:40 GMT]]>

johny_boy32;231944 wrote:
You Are All Incorrect. In 2008, Dodge Made 6400 Challenger SRT-8's. Only 4 Options Available, Color, Sunroof, Navigation, & Upgraded Stereo. As Of Right Now, You Can Order A 2009 To Your Liking But They Have NOT Been Made Yet. You Are Correct On The Fact That You Can Order One With A 3.5L V6, 5.7L HEMI, Or The 6.1L HEMI.

Pretty sure I said ROUGHLY 8000. I didn't say exactly. But otherwise, thanks for the useless info.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/220512https://fargostreet.com/post/220512Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:12:40 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 2009 Challenger!!!!!!!!!!!!!! on Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:47:02 GMT]]>You Are All Incorrect. In 2008, Dodge Made 6400 Challenger SRT-8's. Only 4 Options Available, Color, Sunroof, Navigation, & Upgraded Stereo. As Of Right Now, You Can Order A 2009 To Your Liking But They Have NOT Been Made Yet. You Are Correct On The Fact That You Can Order One With A 3.5L V6, 5.7L HEMI, Or The 6.1L HEMI.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/220491https://fargostreet.com/post/220491Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:47:02 GMT