<![CDATA[No more wagon wheels]]>legacy image

legacy image

legacy image

legacy image

Rear needs to be rolled bad, still riding pretty high for now...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/16114/no-more-wagon-wheelsRSS for NodeWed, 27 May 2026 22:55:30 GMTSun, 18 Jan 2009 06:01:58 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to No more wagon wheels on Wed, 04 Mar 2009 04:00:56 GMT]]>

DelSlow;264270 wrote:
What point was that? That he can put wheels on a car? Good one.

And you can buy a turbo, congrats.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/252697https://fargostreet.com/post/252697Wed, 04 Mar 2009 04:00:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to No more wagon wheels on Wed, 04 Mar 2009 03:57:07 GMT]]>What point was that? That he can put wheels on a car? Good one.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/252695https://fargostreet.com/post/252695Wed, 04 Mar 2009 03:57:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to No more wagon wheels on Wed, 04 Mar 2009 03:51:35 GMT]]>Oh I got this thread confused with his suspension one

Either way this thread has more of a point

His suspension thread however has no point either haha

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/252693https://fargostreet.com/post/252693Wed, 04 Mar 2009 03:51:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to No more wagon wheels on Wed, 04 Mar 2009 03:44:49 GMT]]>

BlackEJ8;264264 wrote:
Hmmm there is more of a point to this thread than yours.

Here I see new suspension installed on a car, whereas your thread was of a turbo not installed on a car...

Hmmm really? Seems to me like he just put some wheels on it. He didn't do shit to his suspension yet.

lawl @ you.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/252690https://fargostreet.com/post/252690Wed, 04 Mar 2009 03:44:49 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to No more wagon wheels on Wed, 04 Mar 2009 03:41:30 GMT]]>

DelSlow;264033 wrote:
Did JN210 make this thread, cuz its pointless...
You got some wheels, ooo. You want a cookie?

Hmmm there is more of a point to this thread than yours.

Here I see new suspension installed on a car, whereas your thread was of a turbo not installed on a car...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/252689https://fargostreet.com/post/252689Wed, 04 Mar 2009 03:41:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to No more wagon wheels on Tue, 03 Mar 2009 21:59:22 GMT]]>

DelSlow;264033 wrote:
Did JN210 make this thread, cuz its pointless...
You got some wheels, ooo. You want a cookie?

I got wheels, do I get a cookie... or do I have to make a thread first?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/252638https://fargostreet.com/post/252638Tue, 03 Mar 2009 21:59:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to No more wagon wheels on Tue, 03 Mar 2009 02:56:23 GMT]]>Did JN210 make this thread, cuz its pointless...
You got some wheels, ooo. You want a cookie?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/252458https://fargostreet.com/post/252458Tue, 03 Mar 2009 02:56:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to No more wagon wheels on Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:07:12 GMT]]>nice

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/246324https://fargostreet.com/post/246324Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:07:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to No more wagon wheels on Sun, 25 Jan 2009 22:09:21 GMT]]>

MisterCMK;257261 wrote:
Are you fayggots actually arguing about which year is more of a queer bait homocar than another year?

lmfao.. it seems like it

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/245705https://fargostreet.com/post/245705Sun, 25 Jan 2009 22:09:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to No more wagon wheels on Sun, 25 Jan 2009 19:07:02 GMT]]>mmmmmk, just checking.:gayfight:

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/245690https://fargostreet.com/post/245690Sun, 25 Jan 2009 19:07:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to No more wagon wheels on Sun, 25 Jan 2009 19:01:36 GMT]]>yes

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/245689https://fargostreet.com/post/245689Sun, 25 Jan 2009 19:01:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to No more wagon wheels on Sun, 25 Jan 2009 18:45:33 GMT]]>Are you fayggots actually arguing about which year is more of a queer bait homocar than another year?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/245686https://fargostreet.com/post/245686Sun, 25 Jan 2009 18:45:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to No more wagon wheels on Sun, 25 Jan 2009 18:17:00 GMT]]>I personally like the 98+ body style better

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/245685https://fargostreet.com/post/245685Sun, 25 Jan 2009 18:17:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to No more wagon wheels on Sat, 24 Jan 2009 23:01:39 GMT]]>not as raw...lawl.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/245655https://fargostreet.com/post/245655Sat, 24 Jan 2009 23:01:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to No more wagon wheels on Sat, 24 Jan 2009 20:49:55 GMT]]>The more uncomfortable the faster

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/245644https://fargostreet.com/post/245644Sat, 24 Jan 2009 20:49:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to No more wagon wheels on Sat, 24 Jan 2009 20:26:40 GMT]]>

Joel;257209 wrote:
anything newer than 97 is just too comfortable.

Yeah, Fuck comfortable cars....

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/245639https://fargostreet.com/post/245639Sat, 24 Jan 2009 20:26:40 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to No more wagon wheels on Sat, 24 Jan 2009 19:56:14 GMT]]>

SPANISH-RICE;256963 wrote:
Why? Because yours is old? Youd say anything older than a 97 isnt a real miata if yours was newer.

agreed

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/245637https://fargostreet.com/post/245637Sat, 24 Jan 2009 19:56:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to No more wagon wheels on Sat, 24 Jan 2009 19:48:56 GMT]]>anything newer than 97 is just too comfortable. Handles way different, not as raw as the rwd sardine can I drive... Wes could probably jump in on this one...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/245634https://fargostreet.com/post/245634Sat, 24 Jan 2009 19:48:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to No more wagon wheels on Sat, 24 Jan 2009 01:07:50 GMT]]>no ls1, no care...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/245586https://fargostreet.com/post/245586Sat, 24 Jan 2009 01:07:50 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to No more wagon wheels on Fri, 23 Jan 2009 01:25:20 GMT]]>

zbrown;256970 wrote:
what qualifies "more macho"??
the "more" does...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/245397https://fargostreet.com/post/245397Fri, 23 Jan 2009 01:25:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to No more wagon wheels on Fri, 23 Jan 2009 01:23:16 GMT]]>

Parker;256967 wrote:
the older ones must be more macho..

what qualifies "more macho"??

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/245395https://fargostreet.com/post/245395Fri, 23 Jan 2009 01:23:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to No more wagon wheels on Fri, 23 Jan 2009 01:12:13 GMT]]>

SPANISH-RICE;256963 wrote:
Why? Because yours is old? Youd say anything older than a 97 isnt a real miata if yours was newer.
the older ones must be more macho..

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/245392https://fargostreet.com/post/245392Fri, 23 Jan 2009 01:12:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to No more wagon wheels on Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:45:51 GMT]]>Why? Because yours is old? Youd say anything older than a 97 isnt a real miata if yours was newer.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/245388https://fargostreet.com/post/245388Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:45:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to No more wagon wheels on Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:12:43 GMT]]>shit defnitly looks retarded. Anything newer than 97 just isnt a real miata in my view.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/245382https://fargostreet.com/post/245382Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:12:43 GMT