<![CDATA[Bloody Valentine 3D]]>If you plan to see it, save your $11.25. It was cool to see in 3D, and if you want to check out 3D that was cool, but the movie was HORRIBLE. Terrible acting and terrible story line.

  • Jason
]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/16125/bloody-valentine-3dRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 20:33:51 GMTMon, 19 Jan 2009 19:25:54 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Bloody Valentine 3D on Wed, 21 Jan 2009 07:35:51 GMT]]>I might eventually download it but it's definitely not on my need to see list.
Hollywood + Remake of an older movie = garbage with the occasional acception, this looking to not being one of them.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/245072https://fargostreet.com/post/245072Wed, 21 Jan 2009 07:35:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Bloody Valentine 3D on Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:48:27 GMT]]>

FG2;256459 wrote:
They did have a girl nude for a solid 3 minutes straight....

SPANISH-RICE;256480 wrote:
WOW, IN 3D? I BET IT WAS LIKE THEY WERE RIGHT IN YOUR FACE. DEFINATLY WORTH 11.25 HAHA

It would have been much cooler had they actually her 'ladies' appear to come off the screen, but they didn't. Save $11.25 and download pron if that is what you are looking for haha.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/244918https://fargostreet.com/post/244918Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:48:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Bloody Valentine 3D on Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:46:20 GMT]]>[QUOTE=FG2;256459]They did have a girl nude for a solid 3 minutes straight....QUOTE]

WOW, IN 3D? I BET IT WAS LIKE THEY WERE RIGHT IN YOUR FACE. DEFINATLY WORTH 11.25 HAHA

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/244905https://fargostreet.com/post/244905Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:46:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Bloody Valentine 3D on Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:19:51 GMT]]>

FG2;256459 wrote:
They did have a girl nude for a solid 3 minutes straight....

no wonder travis keeps fussing about wanting to go to this... rolls eyes

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/244902https://fargostreet.com/post/244902Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:19:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Bloody Valentine 3D on Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:42:06 GMT]]>Jackets with big pockets FTW!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/244894https://fargostreet.com/post/244894Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:42:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Bloody Valentine 3D on Tue, 20 Jan 2009 06:40:34 GMT]]>They did have a girl nude for a solid 3 minutes straight....Which is the only reason it got .5/5 stars. 3D would have been excellent on a highly anticipated movie, but I left wanting to ask for my $11.25 back. They can keep the $4.25 for the 16oz of pop and 36oz of ice.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/244884https://fargostreet.com/post/244884Tue, 20 Jan 2009 06:40:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Bloody Valentine 3D on Tue, 20 Jan 2009 06:25:02 GMT]]>Title sounds like one of those 'love-metal' bands like H.I.M.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/244880https://fargostreet.com/post/244880Tue, 20 Jan 2009 06:25:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Bloody Valentine 3D on Tue, 20 Jan 2009 03:28:36 GMT]]>Just the title of the movie sounds retarded.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/244857https://fargostreet.com/post/244857Tue, 20 Jan 2009 03:28:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Bloody Valentine 3D on Mon, 19 Jan 2009 22:37:18 GMT]]>yeah gonna have to agree the 3D was its only saving grace.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/244815https://fargostreet.com/post/244815Mon, 19 Jan 2009 22:37:18 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Bloody Valentine 3D on Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:45:37 GMT]]>And you expected anything else? haha

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/244811https://fargostreet.com/post/244811Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:45:37 GMT