<![CDATA[Koenigsegg CCX in-game]]>Koenigsegg CCX. In-game model done by Gran Turismo 5 standards. Done by blueprints and huge amount of photo reference. Only in-game textures were used for render. Looks to be pretty bad ass to me...

MORE PICTURES AND VIDEO HERE

legacy image
legacy image
legacy image
legacy image
legacy image
legacy image
legacy image

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/16436/koenigsegg-ccx-in-gameRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 05:45:58 GMTTue, 24 Feb 2009 23:33:07 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Koenigsegg CCX in-game on Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:19:48 GMT]]>So beautiful.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/257642https://fargostreet.com/post/257642Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:19:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Koenigsegg CCX in-game on Thu, 02 Apr 2009 12:54:05 GMT]]>In the link, but just Stumbled this on Youtube so might as well throw it in..

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5fIqRk6pYQ8[/ame]

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/257623https://fargostreet.com/post/257623Thu, 02 Apr 2009 12:54:05 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Koenigsegg CCX in-game on Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:22:09 GMT]]>

torbs;262863 wrote:
That's why you never drove through the grass to get a faster lap time when playing GT4, right? (Matt, help me out here lol)

I always do this when i get bored...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/251651https://fargostreet.com/post/251651Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:22:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Koenigsegg CCX in-game on Thu, 26 Feb 2009 04:28:20 GMT]]>

GarageAlchemist;262492 wrote:
nope, reality is when you hit the grass, your car comes to a standstill, thats real.

That's why you never drove through the grass to get a faster lap time when playing GT4, right? (Matt, help me out here lol)

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/251288https://fargostreet.com/post/251288Thu, 26 Feb 2009 04:28:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Koenigsegg CCX in-game on Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:36:57 GMT]]>exactly what i was saying, but it forza that shit is easy.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/250995https://fargostreet.com/post/250995Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:36:57 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Koenigsegg CCX in-game on Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:08:02 GMT]]>i figured you could keep the car on the track fine in both games.

But have you ever kept a real car on a real track?

Your Enzo drifting comment seems to suggest that anything you've never done before in a real car shouldn't be possible for you to do in a video game.

I'm pointing out that that is ridiculous 🙂

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/250988https://fargostreet.com/post/250988Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:08:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Koenigsegg CCX in-game on Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:04:46 GMT]]>

thrash;262514 wrote:
do you have any kind of track experience at all? If not, is the ability to keep the car on the race track in the game unrealistic for you then?

wtf is that supposed to mean? i can keep the car on the track fine, in both games.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/250964https://fargostreet.com/post/250964Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:04:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Koenigsegg CCX in-game on Wed, 25 Feb 2009 08:27:02 GMT]]>forza is far from "real" but what, in your opinion, is better? need for speed? project gotham? i think everything else pretty much fails in comparison, regardless of how lifelike it actually is. if it was that real would the game be any fun? no, because six people could drive all the cars and nobody else would buy it.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/250947https://fargostreet.com/post/250947Wed, 25 Feb 2009 08:27:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Koenigsegg CCX in-game on Wed, 25 Feb 2009 08:03:19 GMT]]>do you have any kind of track experience at all? If not, is the ability to keep the car on the race track in the game unrealistic for you then?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/250939https://fargostreet.com/post/250939Wed, 25 Feb 2009 08:03:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Koenigsegg CCX in-game on Wed, 25 Feb 2009 06:17:04 GMT]]>

torbs;262459 wrote:
Correction, reality is the ability to drive through a track faster simply by driving through the grass and off the track...

nope, reality is when you hit the grass, your car comes to a standstill, thats real.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/250917https://fargostreet.com/post/250917Wed, 25 Feb 2009 06:17:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Koenigsegg CCX in-game on Wed, 25 Feb 2009 05:30:06 GMT]]>From what I've looked through, looks like it'll be available at the end of this year sometime (4th quarter). double posting is cool and you know it.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/250888https://fargostreet.com/post/250888Wed, 25 Feb 2009 05:30:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Koenigsegg CCX in-game on Wed, 25 Feb 2009 05:28:19 GMT]]>

GarageAlchemist;262451 wrote:
because forza's so damn real. Im sure that me, with no supercar drivng expirence could just hop in an enzo and drift at a 120mph. Sure. Now thats reality.

Correction, reality is the ability to drive through a track faster simply by driving through the grass and off the track...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/250884https://fargostreet.com/post/250884Wed, 25 Feb 2009 05:28:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Koenigsegg CCX in-game on Wed, 25 Feb 2009 05:18:24 GMT]]>

thrash;262414 wrote:
The GT series is pokemon for cars. It's about collecting cars, not driving. That's why the driving and racing physics suck 🙂

I am a GT hater, but only because so many people are GT fanboys 🙂

because forza's so damn real. Im sure that me, with no supercar drivng expirence could just hop in an enzo and drift at a 120mph. Sure. Now thats reality.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/250876https://fargostreet.com/post/250876Wed, 25 Feb 2009 05:18:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Koenigsegg CCX in-game on Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:54:36 GMT]]>

DelSlow;262417 wrote:
2054

Haha so true

But seriously by the time this comes out we will probably be hearing about the next gen counsels...oh well maybe ps3's will be cheap by then so I can build a rig with the g25

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/250873https://fargostreet.com/post/250873Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:54:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Koenigsegg CCX in-game on Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:06:29 GMT]]>

torbs;262415 wrote:
when is this supposed to come out?

2054

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/250842https://fargostreet.com/post/250842Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:06:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Koenigsegg CCX in-game on Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:03:19 GMT]]>This game coupled with the Logitech G25 wheel = awesomeness

when is this supposed to come out?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/250840https://fargostreet.com/post/250840Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:03:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Koenigsegg CCX in-game on Wed, 25 Feb 2009 03:58:01 GMT]]>The GT series is pokemon for cars. It's about collecting cars, not driving. That's why the driving and racing physics suck 🙂

I am a GT hater, but only because so many people are GT fanboys 🙂

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/250839https://fargostreet.com/post/250839Wed, 25 Feb 2009 03:58:01 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Koenigsegg CCX in-game on Wed, 25 Feb 2009 03:08:03 GMT]]>

DelSlow;262402 wrote:
"In-game model by Gran Turismo 5 standards. Done by blueprints and huge amount of photos. Poly budget: 192 449 triangles. Textures: in total diffuse,
normal bump and specular less than 2048x2048 each. Only in-game textures were used. Only normal bump - no displacement. Part of photo reference"

I was just the barer of news.

Yeah I know, I read the article...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/250828https://fargostreet.com/post/250828Wed, 25 Feb 2009 03:08:03 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Koenigsegg CCX in-game on Wed, 25 Feb 2009 02:54:46 GMT]]>

Jim;262401 wrote:
I just re-read the actual article. These were not rendered in real time. They may have used in-game textures and models, but this is not what game play is like.

Not to mention the much higher resolution then is available on PS3...

"In-game model by Gran Turismo 5 standards. Done by blueprints and huge amount of photos. Poly budget: 192 449 triangles. Textures: in total diffuse,
normal bump and specular less than 2048x2048 each. Only in-game textures were used. Only normal bump - no displacement. Part of photo reference"

I was just the barer of news.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/250827https://fargostreet.com/post/250827Wed, 25 Feb 2009 02:54:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Koenigsegg CCX in-game on Wed, 25 Feb 2009 02:53:12 GMT]]>I just re-read the actual article. These were not rendered in real time. They may have used in-game textures and models, but this is not what game play is like.

Not to mention the much higher resolution then is available on PS3...

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/1285438//

GT5 looks good... but not like these renders...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/250826https://fargostreet.com/post/250826Wed, 25 Feb 2009 02:53:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Koenigsegg CCX in-game on Wed, 25 Feb 2009 02:37:48 GMT]]>Fap fap fap

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/250823https://fargostreet.com/post/250823Wed, 25 Feb 2009 02:37:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Koenigsegg CCX in-game on Wed, 25 Feb 2009 02:04:33 GMT]]>Insanity

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/250811https://fargostreet.com/post/250811Wed, 25 Feb 2009 02:04:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Koenigsegg CCX in-game on Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:02:32 GMT]]>That is actually from the game????
Goes out to buy PS3

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/250798https://fargostreet.com/post/250798Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:02:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Koenigsegg CCX in-game on Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:16:36 GMT]]>Dammmn that shit looks real...

Now if only PS3 had another game worth buying....

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/250789https://fargostreet.com/post/250789Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:16:36 GMT