<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Old computer technology from 1964...]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">...and it still works, but very slowly. <img src="https://fargostreet.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f604.png?v=40430adaedb" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--smile" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":D" alt="😄" /></p>
<p dir="auto"><a href="http://dvice.com/archives/2009/05/antique-1964-li.php" rel="nofollow ugc">http://dvice.com/archives/2009/05/antique-1964-li.php</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/topic/17214/old-computer-technology-from-1964...</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 23:14:34 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://fargostreet.com/topic/17214.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 09:38:38 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Old computer technology from 1964... on Fri, 29 May 2009 16:51:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">That is really cool, analog technology.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/265155</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/265155</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[capitlj]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 16:51:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Old computer technology from 1964... on Fri, 29 May 2009 12:47:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Nice. I bet that thing is worth a TON.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/265137</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/265137</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Link]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 12:47:27 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>