Tad218 wrote:
cory loos from north was real good but he transferred to moorhead just for the hockey

Cory Loos was a no-name when he played for North. Now he is a potential D1 player, what does that say about MHD hockey?

d^flex wrote:
this is a joke, central is losing to grafton.

Yeah and Central won in OT! did anyone see the south red river game...?? what happened to south?

When do the spuds play in the state tourny?

Just imagine the greatness of Moorhead dominating Team north dakota, ND's best players vs Moorhead. Id guess a 8-1 win for MHD.

92BlackTT wrote:
are you drunk?

sry, i kinda skipped all your guys whoring and went back to my last statement of it being chick season.

STiSchucky wrote:
i looked at the paper today, it said

fargo south 6 bismarck century 5.
Shots on goal 48 for south, 12 for century. Thats fuckin pathetic.

Imagine if moorhead was in ND. We'd be on atleast a 13-peat right now.

Yeah that game was unreal..they were neck and neck the entire time!
Good luck to the spuds..
I am judging the spirit award at the State Hockey tourny's here so I've been sitting at the ralph from 11:30-10:30 yestarday and I still have 2 more games to go today... so far the games have been pretty good...

I have to agree, basektball sucks around here, I'd take hockey for baskeball anyday!

bluejays wrote:
well my logic was, cars come first in the summer, fall is football, so during the winter and spring chicks are all i got.

are you drunk?

STiSchucky wrote:
yep. well said mitchell.

tits said it, not really a topic to stay on.

after a page and a half you understand what im trying to say? thats got to be some kind of a record

92BlackTT wrote:
thats what im saying...you dont buy a sports team to get rich

you buy a sports team because you already are rich and dont care what you do with 100 million dollars.
yep. well said mitchell.

tits said it, not really a topic to stay on.

you buy a sports team because you already are rich and dont care what you do with 100 million dollars.

edit\ thats a page and a half of whoring over the economics of owning a professional sports team

92BlackTT wrote:
uuh exactly, how much money was made while he was the owner? probably little to none in terms what he payed for it. He didnt see any money until he held on to it for years and then sold it. A guy owns the Timberwolves and has a net worth of 1.9 billion...so what. He didnt get rich buying the Timberwolves.
So, what are you gonna do with 1.9 billion? thats to much you couldnt do anything else. so why not own a professional sports team and have some fun with it?

HandoEX wrote:
paper company based out of Mankato.
Look at Red McCombs...he bought the Vikings for $245 million and sold for well over $600 million.
Sports teams they may not be huge revenue producers but equity multiplies quickly.

uuh exactly, how much money was made while he was the owner? probably little to none in terms what he payed for it. He didnt see any money until he held on to it for years and then sold it. A guy owns the Timberwolves and has a net worth of 1.9 billion...so what. He didnt get rich buying the Timberwolves.

92BlackTT wrote:
How much are you willing to bet that 1.9 billion dollars did not come from owning the timberwolves?
paper company based out of Mankato.
Look at Red McCombs...he bought the Vikings for $245 million and sold for well over $600 million.
Sports teams they may not be huge revenue producers but equity multiplies quickly.

HandoEX wrote:
Well Taylor closed out 2004 worth $1.9 billion so he must be doing something right :rolleyes:

How much are you willing to bet that 1.9 billion dollars did not come from owning the timberwolves?

d^flex wrote:
hes not tryin to hard this year considering the twolves are around the .500 range.
No the owner's fault. We finished with the best record in the West with less talent last year.