<![CDATA[New tattoos for the wife...]]>She just got this done a few hours ago so it's still red/nasty.

legacy image

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/18276/new-tattoos-for-the-wife...RSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 04:43:21 GMTSun, 15 Nov 2009 00:19:38 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to New tattoos for the wife... on Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:46:12 GMT]]>That's a lot of dough for some body art. I don't think I'd ever want something like that.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/282629https://fargostreet.com/post/282629Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:46:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New tattoos for the wife... on Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:50:02 GMT]]>A guy I work with is in the process of getting one that size but has more detail and he has spent $2000 and has about $500 left before it's finished. He went to a guy at addictions.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/282524https://fargostreet.com/post/282524Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:50:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New tattoos for the wife... on Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:57:15 GMT]]>

Colin;293880 wrote:
Very nice, I remember you plugging someone awhile back, but can't remember who. So whos work is that and where do they work out of?

Paul, the owner of 46 and 2

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/282344https://fargostreet.com/post/282344Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:57:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New tattoos for the wife... on Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:26:01 GMT]]>the right ink on the right chick is hot. this particular case - doesn't look to bad.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/282341https://fargostreet.com/post/282341Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:26:01 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New tattoos for the wife... on Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:39:41 GMT]]>sleeves 1/2 3/4 are hot... a dolphin on the foot is not.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/282308https://fargostreet.com/post/282308Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:39:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New tattoos for the wife... on Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:13:50 GMT]]>

capitlj;293902 wrote:
Really? What about someone like Kat Von Dee? She is gorgeous, especially with all those hot tats. I like it.

meh, i dont think tattoos or not i'[d toss it in her..

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/282303https://fargostreet.com/post/282303Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:13:50 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New tattoos for the wife... on Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:09:13 GMT]]>

out there;293904 wrote:
a fine silver teapot is still a fine silver teapot, even if tarnished, it just isn't nearly as gorgeous as when clean and polished. kat von dee is attractive (thanks google!) in spite of the graffiti, but that doesn't change my opinion of tattoos

win

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/282294https://fargostreet.com/post/282294Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:09:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New tattoos for the wife... on Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:04:03 GMT]]>a fine silver teapot is still a fine silver teapot, even if tarnished, it just isn't nearly as gorgeous as when clean and polished. kat von dee is attractive (thanks google!) in spite of the graffiti, but that doesn't change my opinion of tattoos

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/282293https://fargostreet.com/post/282293Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:04:03 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New tattoos for the wife... on Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:11:08 GMT]]>

out there;293901 wrote:
i'm all in favor of not tarnishing lovely women with tattoos.

Really? What about someone like Kat Von Dee? She is gorgeous, especially with all those hot tats. I like it.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/282291https://fargostreet.com/post/282291Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:11:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New tattoos for the wife... on Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:52:30 GMT]]>i'm all in favor of not tarnishing lovely women with tattoos.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/282290https://fargostreet.com/post/282290Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:52:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New tattoos for the wife... on Mon, 16 Nov 2009 09:39:32 GMT]]>^yeah?

looks good

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/282289https://fargostreet.com/post/282289Mon, 16 Nov 2009 09:39:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New tattoos for the wife... on Sun, 15 Nov 2009 19:38:36 GMT]]>Very nice, I remember you plugging someone awhile back, but can't remember who. So whos work is that and where do they work out of?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/282269https://fargostreet.com/post/282269Sun, 15 Nov 2009 19:38:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New tattoos for the wife... on Sun, 15 Nov 2009 16:36:21 GMT]]>Tasty inkwork. Certain women take ink well (as is the case here). Others.... not so well.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/282254https://fargostreet.com/post/282254Sun, 15 Nov 2009 16:36:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New tattoos for the wife... on Sun, 15 Nov 2009 16:31:47 GMT]]>

YellowEvo;293836 wrote:
IC IC, not my cup of tea on a woman but looks good

this

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/282251https://fargostreet.com/post/282251Sun, 15 Nov 2009 16:31:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New tattoos for the wife... on Sun, 15 Nov 2009 03:41:03 GMT]]>Looks good John (well...Megan actually I guess)

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/282231https://fargostreet.com/post/282231Sun, 15 Nov 2009 03:41:03 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New tattoos for the wife... on Sun, 15 Nov 2009 03:29:06 GMT]]>

YellowEvo;293836 wrote:
IC IC, not my cup of tea on a woman but looks good

agreed, no ink for my women

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/282229https://fargostreet.com/post/282229Sun, 15 Nov 2009 03:29:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New tattoos for the wife... on Sun, 15 Nov 2009 01:54:50 GMT]]>No idea....I'd say if a random joe walked in off the street and wanted that done same size/basic concept etc... it'd be around $700-$1000 from the artist that did this....but that is just a guess off the top of my head.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/282228https://fargostreet.com/post/282228Sun, 15 Nov 2009 01:54:50 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New tattoos for the wife... on Sun, 15 Nov 2009 00:53:43 GMT]]>looks cool.

how much does one of those cost

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/282226https://fargostreet.com/post/282226Sun, 15 Nov 2009 00:53:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New tattoos for the wife... on Sun, 15 Nov 2009 00:49:43 GMT]]>IC IC, not my cup of tea on a woman but looks good

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/282225https://fargostreet.com/post/282225Sun, 15 Nov 2009 00:49:43 GMT