<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[craigslist ppl ftw]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a href="http://denver.craigslist.org/cto/1485709696.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://denver.craigslist.org/cto/1485709696.html</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/topic/18377/craigslist-ppl-ftw</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 04:39:07 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://fargostreet.com/topic/18377.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 02:21:14 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to craigslist ppl ftw on Sun, 13 Dec 2009 04:20:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Mazdaspeed6;296035 wrote:<br />
Maybe it's me, but the Ford's rods look more impressive than the dodge or chevy...</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">well u are cobra robs brother... looks like the retardedness runs in the family</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/284426</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/284426</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[bubba]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 04:20:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to craigslist ppl ftw on Sun, 13 Dec 2009 02:36:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Mazdaspeed6;296035 wrote:<br />
Maybe it's me, but the Ford's rods look more impressive than the dodge or chevy...</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Are you serious? Look at the depth of the cummins rods..plus the powerstroke pistons look like gas pistons.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/284424</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/284424</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[PSiedTSi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 02:36:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to craigslist ppl ftw on Sun, 13 Dec 2009 01:47:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">zbrown;295353 wrote:<br />
YEP, whatever you say.... denial??</p>
<p dir="auto">oh, and....</p>
<p dir="auto"><img src="http://ircfabrication.com/images/CompareCummins.jpg" alt="legacy image" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Maybe it's me, but the Ford's rods look more impressive than the dodge or chevy...</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/284422</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/284422</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[[[global:guest]]]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 01:47:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to craigslist ppl ftw on Mon, 07 Dec 2009 01:57:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">It is not a joke</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/283772</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/283772</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[DrifterExtreme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 01:57:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to craigslist ppl ftw on Mon, 07 Dec 2009 01:45:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">that ad has to be a joke...</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/283769</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/283769</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[bubba]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 01:45:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to craigslist ppl ftw on Mon, 07 Dec 2009 00:39:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Bookem;295372 wrote:<br />
Negatory, the most suck would be the gm diesel 5.7</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">excellent observation.... haha</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/283763</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/283763</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[zbrown]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 00:39:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to craigslist ppl ftw on Sun, 06 Dec 2009 23:59:48 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">zbrown;295366 wrote:<br />
no only some...</p>
<p dir="auto">top of the diesel suck list would be the</p>
<p dir="auto">chevy 6.2/6.5 followed by the ford POS 6.0</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Negatory, the most suck would be the gm diesel 5.7</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/283760</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/283760</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bookem]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 23:59:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to craigslist ppl ftw on Sun, 06 Dec 2009 23:47:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I have driven many vehicles with 1000+ ft/lbs.</p>
<p dir="auto">Zbrown probably knows more about diesels then 99% of the people on this website.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/283758</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/283758</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[KA-T_240]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 23:47:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to craigslist ppl ftw on Sun, 06 Dec 2009 22:08:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">ruthless351;295358 wrote:<br />
Zbrown should change his title.....Official Diesel Criticizer</p>
<p dir="auto">Diesels suck anywho......:eek:</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">no only some...</p>
<p dir="auto">top of the diesel suck list would be the</p>
<p dir="auto">chevy 6.2/6.5 followed by the ford POS 6.0</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/283754</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/283754</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[zbrown]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 22:08:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to craigslist ppl ftw on Sun, 06 Dec 2009 22:03:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Yeah ok I'm totally wrong, my brothers truck doesn't work perfectly.  Even pulling a 10 ton excavator.  Its totally junk how could I be so foolish!?  Its going to take some serious talking to convince me that 1000 foot pounds of torque is nothin.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/283753</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/283753</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[capitlj]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 22:03:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to craigslist ppl ftw on Sun, 06 Dec 2009 20:49:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Zbrown should change his title.....Official Diesel Criticizer</p>
<p dir="auto">Diesels suck anywho......:eek:</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/283746</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/283746</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[ruthless351]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 20:49:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to craigslist ppl ftw on Sun, 06 Dec 2009 20:22:26 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Oh snap!!! Cummins ftw...</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/283745</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/283745</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Parker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 20:22:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to craigslist ppl ftw on Sun, 06 Dec 2009 19:10:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">capitlj;295340 wrote:<br />
just trying to explain that there not junk, they just got a bad rap from a couple of problems.  Expensive problems to be sure but not really serious.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">YEP, whatever you say.... denial??</p>
<p dir="auto">oh, and....</p>
<p dir="auto"><img src="http://ircfabrication.com/images/CompareCummins.jpg" alt="legacy image" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/283741</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/283741</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[zbrown]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 19:10:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to craigslist ppl ftw on Sun, 06 Dec 2009 18:46:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">1000 foot pounds in anything is a lot, just because there are a lot of diesels that make that much doesn't make it any less significant.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Ummmm... yes thats exactly what it does</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/283736</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/283736</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[kylush]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 18:46:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to craigslist ppl ftw on Sun, 06 Dec 2009 16:15:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">1000 foot pounds in anything is a lot, just because there are a lot of diesels that make that much doesn't make it any less significant.  I'm not advocating the 6.0 &gt; all point of view here just trying to explain that there not junk, they just got a bad rap from a couple of problems.  Expensive problems to be sure but not really serious.  My brothers has much more than 50k on it just that's what he has put on it since I put the bully dog in it for him almost three years ago.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/283728</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/283728</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[capitlj]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 16:15:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to craigslist ppl ftw on Sat, 05 Dec 2009 03:07:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">capitlj;295247 wrote:<br />
In the last Diesel Power I read through there was one on the dyno that made 1100+ pounds of torque and another that was only 800 but was having trans trouble.  More mods than I can remember but 6.0's nonetheless.  In the race section there was 2 fighting for top Ford honors in Tennessee or something that were running 11's IIRC.  Unless this issue was special those can't be the only examples.  It also had an article that explained in detail the common 6.0 issues, their causes and remedies from some guy that builds them into monsters like the ones above.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">since when is 1k tq on a diesel alot? my buddy in phoenix has a 24v cummins that only has a couple grand into it in parts and we did all of the work and it put down a couple weekends ago 536/1080</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/283672</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/283672</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[beachbum_jon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 03:07:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to craigslist ppl ftw on Fri, 04 Dec 2009 20:39:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">capitlj;295238 wrote:<br />
Seriously they have some problems for sure, but there are a lot of them out there being built, raced, and making tons of power.  Then there are ones like my brother's, just a work truck with a programmer and he hasn't had any issues through about 50,000 miles.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">yawn.....50k miles</p>
<p dir="auto">my 12v cummins has 220k and has been fueling hard for the last 100k since i have had it... 40-45psi no issues</p>
<p dir="auto">runs like new, minimal blow-by, no oil consumption, and would put money on it to walk all over your brothers 6.0............. and do the same at 350k miles</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/283641</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/283641</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[zbrown]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 20:39:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to craigslist ppl ftw on Fri, 04 Dec 2009 18:47:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">In the last Diesel Power I read through there was one on the dyno that made 1100+ pounds of torque and another that was only 800 but was having trans trouble.  More mods than I can remember but 6.0's nonetheless.  In the race section there was 2 fighting for top Ford honors in Tennessee or something that were running 11's IIRC.  Unless this issue was special those can't be the only examples.  It also had an article that explained in detail the common 6.0 issues, their causes and remedies from some guy that builds them into monsters like the ones above.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/283635</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/283635</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[capitlj]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 18:47:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to craigslist ppl ftw on Fri, 04 Dec 2009 17:20:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">capitlj;295238 wrote:<br />
Seriously they have some problems for sure, but there are a lot of them out there being built, raced, and making tons of power.  Then there are ones like my brother's, just a work truck with a programmer and he hasn't had any issues through about 50,000 miles.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">What do you mean by tons of power? Intake, 4inch turbo back and a chip?</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/283628</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/283628</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[KA-T_240]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 17:20:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to craigslist ppl ftw on Fri, 04 Dec 2009 17:18:51 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">zbrown;295232 wrote:<br />
lol... mmmk</p>
<p dir="auto">this thread made my day</p>
<p dir="auto">If you have a 6.0 do NOT run it out of fuel..... especially the early trucks......... or you better have $2500 sitting there for new injectors</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">My advice is to just not buy injectors from Ford <img src="https://fargostreet.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f609.png?v=40430adaedb" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--wink" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=";)" alt="😉" />  They got what they deserved when they attempted to screw over navistar.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/283627</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/283627</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[KA-T_240]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 17:18:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to craigslist ppl ftw on Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:51:01 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Seriously they have some problems for sure, but there are a lot of them out there being built, raced, and making tons of power.  Then there are ones like my brother's, just a work truck with a programmer and he hasn't had any issues through about 50,000 miles.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/283626</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/283626</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[capitlj]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:51:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to craigslist ppl ftw on Fri, 04 Dec 2009 14:27:00 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">capitlj;295228 wrote:<br />
That's funny over 30k lol.</p>
<p dir="auto">The 6.0 has a couple of issues but nothing some aftermarket parts, read ARP head studs and an EGR delete kit, can't solve.  I won't argue against the 7.3 tho, its a good motor.  But the 6.0 gets better mileage, produces less emissions, and can make just as much, if not, more power because of its higher RPM potential.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">lol... mmmk</p>
<p dir="auto">this thread made my day</p>
<p dir="auto">If you have a 6.0 do NOT run it out of fuel..... especially the early trucks......... or you better have $2500 sitting there for new injectors</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/283620</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/283620</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[zbrown]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 14:27:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to craigslist ppl ftw on Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:11:48 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">That's funny over 30k lol.</p>
<p dir="auto">The 6.0 has a couple of issues but nothing some aftermarket parts, read ARP head studs and an EGR delete kit, can't solve.  I won't argue against the 7.3 tho, its a good motor.  But the 6.0 gets better mileage, produces less emissions, and can make just as much, if not, more power because of its higher RPM potential.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/283616</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/283616</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[capitlj]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:11:48 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>