<![CDATA[We the people....]]>legacy image

It's been a little boring around here. 🙂

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/18385/we-the-people....RSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 02:41:21 GMTSun, 06 Dec 2009 06:18:14 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to We the people.... on Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:06:30 GMT]]>Obama is the savior of America.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/284496https://fargostreet.com/post/284496Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:06:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to We the people.... on Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:20:55 GMT]]>^^^
Who the fuck is this guy!?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/284494https://fargostreet.com/post/284494Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:20:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to We the people.... on Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:20:08 GMT]]>legacy image

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/284493https://fargostreet.com/post/284493Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:20:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to We the people.... on Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:27:50 GMT]]>Get rid of everybody, republicans and democrats. Which crooked, dirty, back stabbing, underhanded liars do you like best? Garbage in, Garbage out.:icon_puke_r:

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/284066https://fargostreet.com/post/284066Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:27:50 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to We the people.... on Wed, 09 Dec 2009 10:30:51 GMT]]>that's assuming the media doesn't become diluted with nonsense (like the tiger woods crap) around election times. the situation that we're starting to see even more than before is what aldus huxley feared: we're being overloaded with information so that it all starts to become irrelevant, we're controlled in that we're always sedated, not scared.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/284059https://fargostreet.com/post/284059Wed, 09 Dec 2009 10:30:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to We the people.... on Mon, 07 Dec 2009 02:25:42 GMT]]>It would be the best thing for this country if the Republicans got either the house or senate back under their control....ideally both. Then (IMHO) you would have a Dem president having to throw out just the farthest right bills via veto rather than an ultra-leftist agenda w/ virtually no checks and balances. Should (in theory) force everyone towards the middle....then we would honestly see what kind of president we have. Would he work with the other side to find a truly bipartisan solution or would he just veto out of spite? I'm hoping for (more) bipartisanship, but my gut tells me it would be more vetoing and finger pointing sadly.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/283779https://fargostreet.com/post/283779Mon, 07 Dec 2009 02:25:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to We the people.... on Mon, 07 Dec 2009 02:15:23 GMT]]>win

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/283778https://fargostreet.com/post/283778Mon, 07 Dec 2009 02:15:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to We the people.... on Sun, 06 Dec 2009 07:05:17 GMT]]>one can only hope

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/283715https://fargostreet.com/post/283715Sun, 06 Dec 2009 07:05:17 GMT