<![CDATA[Vikings vs. Saints]]>In my typical stereotype fashion (this thread worked last week). Thoughts on this game?

Vikings 11-0 on turf, coming off a commanding win that NONE of the commentators voted Vikings on...

Thoughts?

I am very VERY excited to watch this game. I truly believe that this game is going to be better than the Super Bowl.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/18574/vikings-vs.-saintsRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 12:00:16 GMTMon, 18 Jan 2010 23:47:14 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Vikings vs. Saints on Tue, 02 Feb 2010 18:30:27 GMT]]>legacy image

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/288061https://fargostreet.com/post/288061Tue, 02 Feb 2010 18:30:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Vikings vs. Saints on Tue, 02 Feb 2010 03:30:19 GMT]]>wow this still going on? who dat.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/288045https://fargostreet.com/post/288045Tue, 02 Feb 2010 03:30:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Vikings vs. Saints on Sat, 30 Jan 2010 07:49:19 GMT]]>the game went to overtime despite the vikings turning the ball over in CRUEL situations.

it wasn't just at midfield. no. it was inside our 10, inside their 10, inside of 20 seconds on the game winning fuckin drive. no matter how you say "you dont turn the ball over, we win", its not going to make anyone/me feel better knowing all of those points on the board should've made this game a lopsided victory.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/287876https://fargostreet.com/post/287876Sat, 30 Jan 2010 07:49:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Vikings vs. Saints on Fri, 29 Jan 2010 23:56:48 GMT]]>

FG2;299470 wrote:
Did you see AP fumble? Did you see Percy fumble? Did you see Berrian fumble? Did you see the offensive line stop any of the pass rushing? Did you see any part of the offense that looked 'NFC Championship' worthy? Our defense SHUT DOWN the Saints (ok...well SLOWED down the Saints), our offense gave the game away. We were the better team, and should have won by at least 2 field goals (minimum, however it more realistically should have been 2 touchdowns). BUT WE DIDN'T... The refs missed a call. That happens in every sport. Don't blame a poor display of a NFL game on a ref or a call...

and don't get it twisted. I nearly threw up after that game, and have been a Vikings fan through 3 generations of family (grandpa, dad, me)....sad end result, but we were lucky to even be in the game at the close of the 4th quarter. Thank you Vikings defense.

Exactly. The refs ALWAYS suck, take care of your business and you have nothing to complain about.

Bp-08;299469 wrote:
Yea they gave up the ball 5 times

[/THREAD]

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/287853https://fargostreet.com/post/287853Fri, 29 Jan 2010 23:56:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Vikings vs. Saints on Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:20:46 GMT]]>Did you see AP fumble? Did you see Percy fumble? Did you see Berrian fumble? Did you see the offensive line stop any of the pass rushing? Did you see any part of the offense that looked 'NFC Championship' worthy? Our defense SHUT DOWN the Saints (ok...well SLOWED down the Saints), our offense gave the game away. We were the better team, and should have won by at least 2 field goals (minimum, however it more realistically should have been 2 touchdowns). BUT WE DIDN'T... The refs missed a call. That happens in every sport. Don't blame a poor display of a NFL game on a ref or a call...

and don't get it twisted. I nearly threw up after that game, and have been a Vikings fan through 3 generations of family (grandpa, dad, me)....sad end result, but we were lucky to even be in the game at the close of the 4th quarter. Thank you Vikings defense.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/287848https://fargostreet.com/post/287848Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:20:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Vikings vs. Saints on Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:51:59 GMT]]>

PSiedTSi;299468 wrote:
I don't care about ONE penalty. What about 5(ok 4 WITH the penalty) turnovers????? No team that gives the ball up 4-5 times even deserves to go to the Super Bowl. Everyone needs to quit crying about penalties. If we had taken care of business, the "penalty" would have been an afterthought. Not a viable excuse at all.

Yea they gave up the ball 5 times or whatever but they outplayed the shit out of NO. And it wasnt just missed penaltys, did you watch overtime and all the ref screw ups. I dont think a team that only gets 75 yards or whatever in the second half deserves to go to the superbowl either.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/287847https://fargostreet.com/post/287847Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:51:59 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Vikings vs. Saints on Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:48:32 GMT]]>

Bp-08;299467 wrote:
Such bullcrap, an apology doesnt cut it in this situation. It was a very important game and the refs majorly screwed up, and in my opinion although being a huge viking fan and probably sounding bias sent the wrong team to the superbowl. But im a realistic viking fan and I think this team was better than the 98 team. But the refs fucked up big time, and an apology doesnt do jack squat. NO is on the way to the superbowl and the vikes got sent home. No apology can make me feel any better about that.

I don't care about ONE penalty. What about 5(ok 4 WITH the penalty) turnovers????? No team that gives the ball up 4-5 times even deserves to go to the Super Bowl. Everyone needs to quit crying about penalties. If we had taken care of business, the "penalty" would have been an afterthought. Not a viable excuse at all.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/287846https://fargostreet.com/post/287846Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:48:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Vikings vs. Saints on Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:46:02 GMT]]>Such bullcrap, an apology doesnt cut it in this situation. It was a very important game and the refs majorly screwed up, and in my opinion although being a huge viking fan and probably sounding bias sent the wrong team to the superbowl. But im a realistic viking fan and I think this team was better than the 98 team. But the refs fucked up big time, and an apology doesnt do jack squat. NO is on the way to the superbowl and the vikes got sent home. No apology can make me feel any better about that.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/287845https://fargostreet.com/post/287845Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:46:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Vikings vs. Saints on Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:32:56 GMT]]>

Jim;299461 wrote:
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs/2009/news/story?id=4868880

the referee's also appologized for not having called that as roughing the passer.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/287840https://fargostreet.com/post/287840Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:32:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Vikings vs. Saints on Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:18:00 GMT]]>http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs/2009/news/story?id=4868880

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/287839https://fargostreet.com/post/287839Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:18:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Vikings vs. Saints on Thu, 28 Jan 2010 04:27:10 GMT]]>

Parker;299280 wrote:
when did you get a Superbowl ring?

There are fewer Bucs fans than players on the team....they issued one to everyone....fans included. :icon_joker:

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/287781https://fargostreet.com/post/287781Thu, 28 Jan 2010 04:27:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Vikings vs. Saints on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:22:55 GMT]]>he had quite a few when we were shitting all over f1....

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/287770https://fargostreet.com/post/287770Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:22:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Vikings vs. Saints on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:46:53 GMT]]>

YellowEvo;299389 wrote:
Keller has more posts in this thread then he has any of the past years...

Hey thanks, here is one more, need more beer.:drunken_smilie:

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/287768https://fargostreet.com/post/287768Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:46:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Vikings vs. Saints on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:44:43 GMT]]>Keller has more posts in this thread then he has any of the past years...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/287767https://fargostreet.com/post/287767Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:44:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Vikings vs. Saints on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:17:08 GMT]]>

FG2;299380 wrote:
drunk? Its 4 in the afternoon!

yep, i'm laid off right now so alcohol helps pass the time. I recommend it, the great winter equalizer. :drunken_smilie:

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/287759https://fargostreet.com/post/287759Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:17:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Vikings vs. Saints on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:13:34 GMT]]>drunk? Its 4 in the afternoon!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/287758https://fargostreet.com/post/287758Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:13:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Vikings vs. Saints on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:07:48 GMT]]>I love you guys, sorry drunk.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/287756https://fargostreet.com/post/287756Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:07:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Vikings vs. Saints on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:00:55 GMT]]>

FG2;299370 wrote:
Judging from the 2010-2011 Vikings schedule, we will be lucky to have that record ourselves.... It's NASTY.

psh.

nfc east sucks.

afc east= crap

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/287749https://fargostreet.com/post/287749Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:00:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Vikings vs. Saints on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:42:16 GMT]]>Judging from the 2010-2011 Vikings schedule, we will be lucky to have that record ourselves.... It's NASTY.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/287748https://fargostreet.com/post/287748Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:42:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Vikings vs. Saints on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:55:36 GMT]]>Ding Ding Ding. Pssst. FG2, I think we both understand where that was going. We were just havin fun. DONE. I love you to Kirk, lets never fight again.(TEARS). Out of those 208 wins one of them is a SUPERBOWL!!!! maybe one of these years the vikings will win one too. 323 losses, that makes me laugh too. I watched them lose and lose for years, it was almost comical. They would make me laugh so hard when the ball would bounce off their helmets and they would fall down, brings back good memories. There is always next season. My guess is Bucs 6-10 or maybe 7-9.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/287747https://fargostreet.com/post/287747Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:55:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Vikings vs. Saints on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:40:52 GMT]]>

naturalbornkeller;299357 wrote:
See, hook buried in mouth, then played off like never happened. Had to release you at this point. Thanks for playing. Wow you even knew the game and you failed. WINNER.:icon_cheers:

You are not following the obvious joke I was playing with either... :drunken_smilie: After the first '....bitch', I figured the SECOND would help you understand that everything is ok.

It's ok man, I am not bothered by the internets, nor someone competing with me for the troll of the thread award.

but why did you call me a bitch? <-----This is a joke, I'm not actually serious. GET IT?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/287746https://fargostreet.com/post/287746Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:40:52 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Vikings vs. Saints on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:38:52 GMT]]>

naturalbornkeller;299363 wrote:
Why so butt hurt kirk? My second favorite team is the one playing the vikings. I even cheered for the cowboys, that sucked but had to. How does that not make me a bucs fan? I just hate the vikes and love to see them fail every year. No going to the super bowl huh? I hope all those vikes players have fun going to the pro bowl hahahaha. Even more pathetic is that they have 10 probowlers and couldn't beat the saints. Oh yeah, one more time, How many superbowls have the vikings won. Even the lowly bucs have won a superbowl. Thats why they play the game. FAIL!!! I'm done with you HOMERS. Oh no the vikes fumbled again.HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
i love you

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/287745https://fargostreet.com/post/287745Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:38:52 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Vikings vs. Saints on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:18:36 GMT]]>

naturalbornkeller;299363 wrote:
Why so butt hurt kirk? My second favorite team is the one playing the vikings. I even cheered for the cowboys, that sucked but had to. How does that not make me a bucs fan? I just hate the vikes and love to see them fail every year. No going to the super bowl huh? I hope all those vikes players have fun going to the pro bowl hahahaha. Even more pathetic is that they have 10 probowlers and couldn't beat the saints. Oh yeah, one more time, How many superbowls have the vikings won. Even the lowly bucs have won a superbowl. Thats why they play the game. FAIL!!! I'm done with you HOMERS. Oh no the vikes fumbled again.HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

your 1 superbowl win is the only thing you have going for you...otherwise your teams overall record is an amazing...208 wins-323 losses.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/287743https://fargostreet.com/post/287743Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:18:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Vikings vs. Saints on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:08:02 GMT]]>

naturalbornkeller;299363 wrote:
Why so butt hurt kirk? My second favorite team is the one playing the vikings. I even cheered for the cowboys, that sucked but had to. How does that not make me a bucs fan? I just hate the vikes and love to see them fail every year. No going to the super bowl huh? I hope all those vikes players have fun going to the pro bowl hahahaha. Even more pathetic is that they have 10 probowlers and couldn't beat the saints. Oh yeah, one more time, How many superbowls have the vikings won. Even the lowly bucs have won a superbowl. Thats why they play the game. FAIL!!! I'm done with you HOMERS. Oh no the vikes fumbled again.HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

I don't even follow the NFL and it is still obvious to me that you have issues

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/287742https://fargostreet.com/post/287742Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:08:02 GMT