<![CDATA[Lame]]>http://jalopnik.com/5494178/2011-ford-mustang-gt-412-hp-and-26-mpg

Only 412hp. Weak.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/18840/lameRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 04:38:37 GMTTue, 16 Mar 2010 05:37:37 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Lame on Mon, 05 Apr 2010 12:51:56 GMT]]>

Cobra Rob;305262 wrote:
2011 mustang vs 2010 camaro ss drag in 1/8
now this is interesting:)
http://www.streetfire.net/video/2011-ford-mustang-gt-vs-camaro-ss-drag-race_1872249.htm

So? It's still not a BMW...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/293645https://fargostreet.com/post/293645Mon, 05 Apr 2010 12:51:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Lame on Mon, 05 Apr 2010 08:08:13 GMT]]>

Cobra Rob;305204 wrote:
they have done dyno numbers on the mustang and the hp claims are not true, its actually more then ford has claimed,since its putting close to 400hp to the wheels stock,
this car will rape must BMW out there no doubt

Lol.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/293641https://fargostreet.com/post/293641Mon, 05 Apr 2010 08:08:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Lame on Mon, 05 Apr 2010 06:15:04 GMT]]>2011 mustang vs 2010 camaro ss drag in 1/8
now this is interesting:)
http://www.streetfire.net/video/2011-ford-mustang-gt-vs-camaro-ss-drag-race_1872249.htm

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/293639https://fargostreet.com/post/293639Mon, 05 Apr 2010 06:15:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Lame on Mon, 05 Apr 2010 04:57:16 GMT]]>

Eurofan;305185 wrote:
Better fuel economy!!!?!?! NOT

There is no way this car gets 30mpg at 75 mph

Oh, I was talking about the V6 mustang... the one for sorority girls. That one is 300/300/30mpg. The mileage is legit. As to whether or not it's faster than a 335i... I guess we'll see.

I love that these horseshit ford motors run on 87 gas too.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/293636https://fargostreet.com/post/293636Mon, 05 Apr 2010 04:57:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Lame on Mon, 05 Apr 2010 04:07:11 GMT]]>Um... all the mod motors have overhead cams. Only a handful have 4 cams but none of them have pushrods. I guess I can throw GM a bone here the LS motors have a pushrod valvetrain and they are incredible engines.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/293634https://fargostreet.com/post/293634Mon, 05 Apr 2010 04:07:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Lame on Sun, 04 Apr 2010 08:09:47 GMT]]>Any fool knows dohc is more efficient than pushrod.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/293594https://fargostreet.com/post/293594Sun, 04 Apr 2010 08:09:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Lame on Sun, 04 Apr 2010 06:34:23 GMT]]>

zbrown;305206 wrote:
mod motors overrated? um,...... yes

good anchor i guess

legacy image

and I love mustangs...

legacy image

and you like iron man you silly little kid:icon_puke_r:

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/293591https://fargostreet.com/post/293591Sun, 04 Apr 2010 06:34:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Lame on Sun, 04 Apr 2010 03:43:44 GMT]]>mod motors overrated? um,...... yes

good anchor i guess

legacy image

and I love mustangs...

legacy image

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/293583https://fargostreet.com/post/293583Sun, 04 Apr 2010 03:43:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Lame on Sun, 04 Apr 2010 03:34:21 GMT]]>

Eurofan;305195 wrote:
Dude. Its called efficient dynamics. DUHHH :icon_rabbit:

they have done dyno numbers on the mustang and the hp claims are not true, its actually more then ford has claimed,since its putting close to 400hp to the wheels stock,
this car will rape must BMW out there no doubt

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/293581https://fargostreet.com/post/293581Sun, 04 Apr 2010 03:34:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Lame on Sat, 03 Apr 2010 22:30:17 GMT]]>

Eurofan;305185 wrote:
Better fuel economy!!!?!?! NOT

There is no way this car gets 30mpg at 75 mph

Who cares about fuel economy? Are you poor?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/293573https://fargostreet.com/post/293573Sat, 03 Apr 2010 22:30:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Lame on Sat, 03 Apr 2010 22:06:10 GMT]]>

Joel;305186 wrote:
So thats your excuse that your car is better? gas mileage? you sound like a honda civic owner now!

Dude. Its called efficient dynamics. DUHHH :icon_rabbit:

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/293572https://fargostreet.com/post/293572Sat, 03 Apr 2010 22:06:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Lame on Sat, 03 Apr 2010 17:31:31 GMT]]>

Joel;305186 wrote:
So thats your excuse that your car is better? gas mileage? you sound like a honda civic owner now!

dont argue with eurofan he knows all...and if he's wrong it'll turn into a "joke....internet is sooo serious"

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/293564https://fargostreet.com/post/293564Sat, 03 Apr 2010 17:31:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Lame on Sat, 03 Apr 2010 17:19:45 GMT]]>

Eurofan;305185 wrote:
Better fuel economy!!!?!?! NOT

There is no way this car gets 30mpg at 75 mph
So thats your excuse that your car is better? gas mileage? you sound like a honda civic owner now!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/293563https://fargostreet.com/post/293563Sat, 03 Apr 2010 17:19:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Lame on Sat, 03 Apr 2010 16:59:56 GMT]]>

thrash;305146 wrote:
I think it's cool that Ford can build a car that is faster than yours, easy to mass produce, and gets better fuel economy.

Better fuel economy!!!?!?! NOT

There is no way this car gets 30mpg at 75 mph

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/293562https://fargostreet.com/post/293562Sat, 03 Apr 2010 16:59:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Lame on Sat, 03 Apr 2010 02:36:58 GMT]]>http://autos.yahoo.com/articles/autos_content_landing_pages/1372/should-you-buy-american-now/

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/293530https://fargostreet.com/post/293530Sat, 03 Apr 2010 02:36:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Lame on Sat, 03 Apr 2010 01:25:10 GMT]]>

thrash;305146 wrote:
I think it's cool that Ford can build a car that is faster than yours, easy to mass produce, and gets better fuel economy.

Don't forget less expensive to buy and maintain.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/293524https://fargostreet.com/post/293524Sat, 03 Apr 2010 01:25:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Lame on Sat, 03 Apr 2010 01:21:48 GMT]]>I think it's cool that Ford can build a car that is faster than yours, easy to mass produce, and gets better fuel economy.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/293523https://fargostreet.com/post/293523Sat, 03 Apr 2010 01:21:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Lame on Fri, 02 Apr 2010 22:35:03 GMT]]>

Cobra Rob;303332 wrote:
the camaro weights alot more than the 2011 mustang :icon_scratch:

Cobra Rob;303334 wrote:
also the new 5.0 redline is 7000 rpm that is interesting:)

Who the fuck cares. Its a Mustang. Plasticly piece of shit.

I hate new American muscle. I just dont understand. There is a time and era for everything let it be. Be progressive... do relive the past tards...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/293511https://fargostreet.com/post/293511Fri, 02 Apr 2010 22:35:03 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Lame on Fri, 02 Apr 2010 21:45:15 GMT]]>[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oOQcc1JyRVs&playnext_from=TL&videos=p2-AA78keUw&feature=sub[/ame]

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/293505https://fargostreet.com/post/293505Fri, 02 Apr 2010 21:45:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Lame on Thu, 18 Mar 2010 04:04:30 GMT]]>^funny:)

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/291815https://fargostreet.com/post/291815Thu, 18 Mar 2010 04:04:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Lame on Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:17:36 GMT]]>I wonder if there will be a re-call like there was with the 2010' model??

2010 Recall

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/291718https://fargostreet.com/post/291718Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:17:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Lame on Wed, 17 Mar 2010 06:04:14 GMT]]>also the new 5.0 redline is 7000 rpm that is interesting:)

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/291712https://fargostreet.com/post/291712Wed, 17 Mar 2010 06:04:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Lame on Wed, 17 Mar 2010 05:57:36 GMT]]>

Grr;303287 wrote:
maybe they will FINALLY have a car that can beat a STOCK 87 grand national, too bad i got 26-27mpg with that 24 year old car........

wheres the damn ecoboost?? fuck that pos OHC 5.0

Maybe it will actually be able to beat the 300hp 3.6L V6 camaro that gets 29mpg....... but i doubt it

the camaro weights alot more than the 2011 mustang :icon_scratch:

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/291710https://fargostreet.com/post/291710Wed, 17 Mar 2010 05:57:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Lame on Wed, 17 Mar 2010 03:18:52 GMT]]>

MisterCMK;303268 wrote:
http://jalopnik.com/5494178/2011-ford-mustang-gt-412-hp-and-26-mpg

Only 412hp. Weak.

What's weak? Cmk buying one or are the blocks going to crack at 500 horses:icon_rr::icon_rr::icon_rr:

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/291703https://fargostreet.com/post/291703Wed, 17 Mar 2010 03:18:52 GMT