<![CDATA[Economics in relation to the female race.]]>Conversation between my father and I while I was in the process of studying for Econ.

Me: OHHH MY LORD! My thoughts on economics: takes the simple and logical things and over analyzes them making them far to complex and complicated to understand.. Economics relates to females in that sense...AHH MY head is going to explode from this crap.

Dad: Actually females are quite logical

Me: HA! Cryptic at my age...

Dad: No when you really think about it, it is the males that take the simple and logical and over analyze and make things far more complicated. We should listen to women more. They have it figured out.

Me: ........... You're scaring the crap out of me right now... long day or something? You must be tired go to bed...

Dad: No I am serious and it would do you well to embrace the facts. Everyones got to be something. And we truly are the weaker sex.

Me: Eeeeekkkk. Enought blasphemy from you.. Go to bed wow lol.

Dad: You will just have to figure it out your self

Me: Scary thought.....

Dad: ya right... you should know who really had my phone. That was a bunch bullshit, night.

Me: ROFL

^apparently my step mom had my fathers phone and decided to bullshit to me before he realized he was ever texting me. lmao...

Cool story, i know

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/18904/economics-in-relation-to-the-female-race.RSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 23:05:39 GMTThu, 25 Mar 2010 03:46:07 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Economics in relation to the female race. on Sat, 27 Mar 2010 00:18:38 GMT]]>I always laugh when I see that picture

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/292946https://fargostreet.com/post/292946Sat, 27 Mar 2010 00:18:38 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Economics in relation to the female race. on Sat, 27 Mar 2010 00:08:07 GMT]]>Hell to the yeah!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/292945https://fargostreet.com/post/292945Sat, 27 Mar 2010 00:08:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Economics in relation to the female race. on Sat, 27 Mar 2010 00:06:28 GMT]]>There ya go, LOL at Tony

untitled.JPG

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/292944https://fargostreet.com/post/292944Sat, 27 Mar 2010 00:06:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Economics in relation to the female race. on Fri, 26 Mar 2010 22:33:29 GMT]]>

Kossick;304535 wrote:
Ha normally I prolly wouldn't, but she pissed me off last night so yeah, come 6 o' clock when I get home I post one up

/subscribed

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/292937https://fargostreet.com/post/292937Fri, 26 Mar 2010 22:33:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Economics in relation to the female race. on Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:01:29 GMT]]>Ha normally I prolly wouldn't, but she pissed me off last night so yeah, come 6 o' clock when I get home I post one up

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/292912https://fargostreet.com/post/292912Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:01:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Economics in relation to the female race. on Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:50:53 GMT]]>pics or ban!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/292904https://fargostreet.com/post/292904Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:50:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Economics in relation to the female race. on Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:27:11 GMT]]>

2wheeler;304471 wrote:
There's nothin simple about that rack. 😛

Well said! Lol

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/292894https://fargostreet.com/post/292894Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:27:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Economics in relation to the female race. on Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:51:24 GMT]]>legacy image

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/292888https://fargostreet.com/post/292888Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:51:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Economics in relation to the female race. on Fri, 26 Mar 2010 01:23:32 GMT]]>pics of said wife?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/292858https://fargostreet.com/post/292858Fri, 26 Mar 2010 01:23:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Economics in relation to the female race. on Fri, 26 Mar 2010 01:22:02 GMT]]>

2wheeler;304471 wrote:
There's nothin simple about that rack. 😛
this post is packed with win!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/292857https://fargostreet.com/post/292857Fri, 26 Mar 2010 01:22:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Economics in relation to the female race. on Thu, 25 Mar 2010 23:50:26 GMT]]>

Kossick;304461 wrote:
lol! My wife is actually pretty simple... once you get past the pageants, figureskating, and all the other really girlie girl stuff
There's nothin simple about that rack. 😛

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/292848https://fargostreet.com/post/292848Thu, 25 Mar 2010 23:50:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Economics in relation to the female race. on Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:24:02 GMT]]>lol! My wife is actually pretty simple... once you get past the pageants, figureskating, and all the other really girlie girl stuff

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/292838https://fargostreet.com/post/292838Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:24:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Economics in relation to the female race. on Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:50:04 GMT]]>Allthatshitbyyou.jpg

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/292801https://fargostreet.com/post/292801Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:50:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Economics in relation to the female race. on Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:20:29 GMT]]>scandalous kniving bitches

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/292796https://fargostreet.com/post/292796Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:20:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Economics in relation to the female race. on Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:09:08 GMT]]>lol girls being logical. thats a good one

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/292794https://fargostreet.com/post/292794Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:09:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Economics in relation to the female race. on Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:23:34 GMT]]>

Eurofan;304381 wrote:
Cool story, i know
...yep...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/292786https://fargostreet.com/post/292786Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:23:34 GMT