<![CDATA[Tang Band 8&quot; subwoofer in box]]>I have 2 of these left. Enclosure built by yours truly and carpeted to your choice of Black or Grey (pictured). These will get you laid fo sho, will stop world hunger, and put an end to terrorism. Hell, I even got Bubba to spend some of his moldy fuckin money on one of them.

$110.00 firm. Can deliver to Fargo if needed.

Pic
legacy image

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/19153/tang-band-8-quot-subwoofer-in-boxRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 01:18:14 GMTTue, 04 May 2010 02:27:39 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Tang Band 8&quot; subwoofer in box on Thu, 13 May 2010 15:22:05 GMT]]>Just so EVERYONE knows. These were a AWESOME DEAL. The package price I have sold these at will NOT be what its going to cost for a different set up.<u> I sold these for what I had into them.</u> If I have to build new enclosures, I wont do it for free. It will cost more. How much really depends.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/297750https://fargostreet.com/post/297750Thu, 13 May 2010 15:22:05 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Tang Band 8&quot; subwoofer in box on Thu, 13 May 2010 14:58:04 GMT]]>I'd say 5/8" would be the minimum you'd want to use in any circumstance...Unless you are bracing the crap out of the box and putting fiberglass resin on the inside of the box to make it a bit more rigid.

Shooting from the hip on weight (based on memory) each one weighs about 8 to 10 lbs. I'd say that if you have a pair of them, in a box of about 1 cuft total (including port volume) would weigh ~35-40 lbs...maybe less.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/297741https://fargostreet.com/post/297741Thu, 13 May 2010 14:58:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Tang Band 8&quot; subwoofer in box on Thu, 13 May 2010 14:42:19 GMT]]>

Trafik Jamz;309356 wrote:
If you do an Atomic MA series the output would be the same, but the box size would be about 1/2 of what the Tangband requires.

I have 6 of the MA-8's going into a 2.0 cubic foot vented enclosure.

What kind of weight would the ma's be, two of them in sepereate boxes? Would 1/2" be enough or should the box be 3/4"?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/297736https://fargostreet.com/post/297736Thu, 13 May 2010 14:42:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Tang Band 8&quot; subwoofer in box on Thu, 13 May 2010 14:16:36 GMT]]>

Trafik Jamz;309356 wrote:
If you do an Atomic MA series the output would be the same, but the box size would be about 1/2 of what the Tangband requires.

I have 6 of the MA-8's going into a 2.0 cubic foot vented enclosure.

HMMMMMMM 1/2 The the box size? That sounds pretty sweet. I might be intersted in that.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/297734https://fargostreet.com/post/297734Thu, 13 May 2010 14:16:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Tang Band 8&quot; subwoofer in box on Thu, 13 May 2010 14:00:10 GMT]]>If you do an Atomic MA series the output would be the same, but the box size would be about 1/2 of what the Tangband requires.

I have 6 of the MA-8's going into a 2.0 cubic foot vented enclosure.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/297733https://fargostreet.com/post/297733Thu, 13 May 2010 14:00:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Tang Band 8&quot; subwoofer in box on Thu, 13 May 2010 02:54:56 GMT]]>

fanaticrockford;309314 wrote:
Can chuck get Tang Band or just have Atomic build an identical speaker?

Also the ones you sold were a W8-740C. I can only find a W8-740P. Are they the same sub with a new part #?
Identical in ALL parameters except power handling. The c's were rated at a lil less total power. Chuck can get both the Tang Bands and the Atomics. By the looks of them, I'd be tempted to do the Atomics. See what Chuck can do for you.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/297706https://fargostreet.com/post/297706Thu, 13 May 2010 02:54:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Tang Band 8&quot; subwoofer in box on Thu, 13 May 2010 02:05:06 GMT]]>Can chuck get Tang Band or just have Atomic build an identical speaker?

Also the ones you sold were a W8-740C. I can only find a W8-740P. Are they the same sub with a new part #?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/297691https://fargostreet.com/post/297691Thu, 13 May 2010 02:05:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Tang Band 8&quot; subwoofer in box on Wed, 12 May 2010 10:48:57 GMT]]>its cool. just curious, not gonna lose sleep over it.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/297633https://fargostreet.com/post/297633Wed, 12 May 2010 10:48:57 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Tang Band 8&quot; subwoofer in box on Wed, 12 May 2010 04:44:58 GMT]]>Ya Joel, he did. You shoulda bought the first one 2-3 weeks ago when you had first chance. Sorry.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/297624https://fargostreet.com/post/297624Wed, 12 May 2010 04:44:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Tang Band 8&quot; subwoofer in box on Wed, 12 May 2010 03:29:13 GMT]]>

Joel;309230 wrote:
so did travis buy it? if not i'll take it.

sure did

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/297609https://fargostreet.com/post/297609Wed, 12 May 2010 03:29:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Tang Band 8&quot; subwoofer in box on Wed, 12 May 2010 02:19:32 GMT]]>so did travis buy it? if not i'll take it.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/297607https://fargostreet.com/post/297607Wed, 12 May 2010 02:19:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Tang Band 8&quot; subwoofer in box on Mon, 10 May 2010 04:42:22 GMT]]>

dont got a ride;308967 wrote:
did you have one bumping on saturday? i could hear it clear across the parkin lot

Ya. msg length.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/297375https://fargostreet.com/post/297375Mon, 10 May 2010 04:42:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Tang Band 8&quot; subwoofer in box on Mon, 10 May 2010 02:58:55 GMT]]>did you have one bumping on saturday? i could hear it clear across the parkin lot

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/297344https://fargostreet.com/post/297344Mon, 10 May 2010 02:58:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Tang Band 8&quot; subwoofer in box on Sun, 09 May 2010 04:40:10 GMT]]>If theres enough interest, I may be able to work out a deal with Chuck on some Atomic subs and build some more. the price may be a little bit higher but I dont think much more.

The amount of interest will gauge how far I will take it. Holla at ya boy if ya want something.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/297239https://fargostreet.com/post/297239Sun, 09 May 2010 04:40:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Tang Band 8&quot; subwoofer in box on Sun, 09 May 2010 02:18:36 GMT]]>Ya travis gets the last one

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/297226https://fargostreet.com/post/297226Sun, 09 May 2010 02:18:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Tang Band 8&quot; subwoofer in box on Sun, 09 May 2010 00:20:54 GMT]]>i got dibs on one today

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/297218https://fargostreet.com/post/297218Sun, 09 May 2010 00:20:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Tang Band 8&quot; subwoofer in box on Sat, 08 May 2010 16:19:28 GMT]]>

PSiedTSi;308802 wrote:
lmao, what about poly fill? Doesn't that "spoof" more enclosure space? Hell, just build the trunk into a huge box hahah jk

It won't compensate for too small of a box, but it will make appropriate sized enclosures act like a slightly larger enclosure by slowing down the rear waves....and even then would only really make it sound like ~.2 cuft bigger

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/297184https://fargostreet.com/post/297184Sat, 08 May 2010 16:19:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Tang Band 8&quot; subwoofer in box on Sat, 08 May 2010 16:07:17 GMT]]>

Trafik Jamz;308783 wrote:
The sub box he needs is about 4 cuft+ port volume....so around 5.2 cuft total....that's why it won't fit.

lmao, what about poly fill? Doesn't that "spoof" more enclosure space? Hell, just build the trunk into a huge box hahah jk

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/297179https://fargostreet.com/post/297179Sat, 08 May 2010 16:07:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Tang Band 8&quot; subwoofer in box on Sat, 08 May 2010 14:44:56 GMT]]>

weshole;308786 wrote:
Oh and btw..... I have sold to two of the 3 cheapest, tightest mutherfuckers that frequent this site. Brandon and Faber...............

TORBS!!!!! your next.

HA epic!!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/297174https://fargostreet.com/post/297174Sat, 08 May 2010 14:44:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Tang Band 8&quot; subwoofer in box on Sat, 08 May 2010 13:07:39 GMT]]>Oh and btw..... I have sold to two of the 3 cheapest, tightest mutherfuckers that frequent this site. Brandon and Faber...............

TORBS!!!!! your next.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/297163https://fargostreet.com/post/297163Sat, 08 May 2010 13:07:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Tang Band 8&quot; subwoofer in box on Sat, 08 May 2010 12:26:13 GMT]]>

PSiedTSi;308724 wrote:
Rebuild the box for the car?? It's not that difficult...

The sub box he needs is about 4 cuft+ port volume....so around 5.2 cuft total....that's why it won't fit.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/297160https://fargostreet.com/post/297160Sat, 08 May 2010 12:26:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Tang Band 8&quot; subwoofer in box on Sat, 08 May 2010 06:35:08 GMT]]>Well, three down..... 1 to go. Thanks for your business Faber.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/297148https://fargostreet.com/post/297148Sat, 08 May 2010 06:35:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Tang Band 8&quot; subwoofer in box on Fri, 07 May 2010 22:01:29 GMT]]>

wishinsky;308713 wrote:
Well wes if you have any of these left maybe i will look into one in about a month if you still go it. I can't fit my 15" in the trunk so it needs to go.

Rebuild the box for the car?? It's not that difficult...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/297101https://fargostreet.com/post/297101Fri, 07 May 2010 22:01:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Tang Band 8&quot; subwoofer in box on Fri, 07 May 2010 21:43:50 GMT]]>

blackcherryTSi;308707 wrote:
ive got a cheap V3 400 watt amp on mine and it hits pretty damn good. i wanna step up to 500-600 tho see what it has ha

I know where there's an amp that size, just sitting around too 🙂

bump for some sweet bumps...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/297097https://fargostreet.com/post/297097Fri, 07 May 2010 21:43:50 GMT