<![CDATA[Fargostreet TOP 1/4 mile times]]>Post name, 1/4 miles times, trap speed, year ran, and vehicle. You may include a short mod list in your post as well.

TOP 20 CARS

  1. XJHead, 7.647 @ 187 mph, 2010, 1995 Ford Mustang
  2. DaveH, 7.77 @ 176 mph, 2011, 1994 Toyota Supra
  3. Fallguy, 8.14 @ 168, 2011, 1990 Probe GT RWD 2jz
  4. zbrown, 8.71 @ 153, 2013, Mazda RX7
  5. ashford, 9.28 @ 146, 2012, 1983 Mercury Capri
  6. aliengotpsi, 9.77 @ 146 , 2011, 2003 Mitsubishi Evo
  7. Christian, 9.99 @ 136, 2010, 1993 Ford Mustang
  8. 2.2=8, 10.21 @ 136, 2011, 1984 Chrysler Laser
  9. Corey Berwick, 10.42 @ 144, 2011, Honda Civic
  10. 90rs&01rs, 10.42 @ 133, 2012, 1982 Chevy Camaro
  11. 00Ws6TransAm, 10.52 @ 133.77, 2010, 2000 TransAm
  12. riceh8r, 10.537 @ 135, 2010, 1995 Mustang
  13. goldyhatchpsi, 10.56 @ 138, 2011, 1992 Honda Civic
  14. bonestock_442, 10.8 @ 124, 2010, 1985 cutlass 442 lq4 swap
  15. YellowEvo, 10.92 @125 mph, 2011, 2003 Mitsubishi Evo
  16. N2OEQIP, 11.10 @ 128, 2010, 1997 V6 Camaro
  17. Grr, 11.41 @ 120, 2012, 2000 Chevy Camaro
  18. gsrEK, 11.47 @ 124 , 2009, 1993 Honda Civic
  19. PSI2HI, 11.5, 2010, Mazda Miata
  20. Instigator, 11.83 @ 118, 2011, 2003 Cobra

TOP 10 BIKES

  1. k8turbo, 8.397 @ 175, 2011, 2008 Suzuki GSXR-1000
  2. Monster14, 8.50 @ 160, 2010, 2006 Kawasaki ZX-14
  3. Jeremy Stensland, 8.91, 2012, 2008 Yamaha R1
  4. Ryan Schumacher, 9.120 @ 156, 2013, 2005 Suzuki Hayabusa
  5. 2wheeler, 9.122 @ 146, 2013, 2008 Suzuki Hayabusa
  6. Drama, 9.28@147, 2011, 2006 Suzuki GSXR-1000
  7. Josh Peterson, 9.34, 2012, 2007 Kawasaki ZX14R
  8. Top End, 9.433 @145, 2010, 2007 Suzuki GSXR-1000
  9. Nick Hughes, 9.64, 2012, 2008 Suzuki Hayabusa
  10. Dana Espelund, 9.69, 2012, 2003 Suzuki Hayabusa
]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/19269/fargostreet-top-1-4-mile-timesRSS for NodeWed, 27 May 2026 21:36:25 GMTTue, 25 May 2010 18:27:32 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Fargostreet TOP 1/4 mile times on Fri, 18 Jul 2014 03:22:41 GMT]]>as of right now i'm 9.66 @ 144 (7-12-14)

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/316599https://fargostreet.com/post/316599Fri, 18 Jul 2014 03:22:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Fargostreet TOP 1/4 mile times on Mon, 07 Oct 2013 00:42:56 GMT]]>9.90 @ 144.31 82 camaro

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/316462https://fargostreet.com/post/316462Mon, 07 Oct 2013 00:42:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Fargostreet TOP 1/4 mile times on Thu, 26 Sep 2013 14:08:30 GMT]]>faster than ethan....

legacy image

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/316447https://fargostreet.com/post/316447Thu, 26 Sep 2013 14:08:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Fargostreet TOP 1/4 mile times on Thu, 25 Jul 2013 13:59:32 GMT]]>Thanks for the explaination and for getting it fixed quickly. I guess I'll just have to come back out when the temps drop to get my 12.99 😄

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/316393https://fargostreet.com/post/316393Thu, 25 Jul 2013 13:59:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Fargostreet TOP 1/4 mile times on Thu, 25 Jul 2013 02:56:28 GMT]]>I apologize for the timing issues guys. As soon as the issues were brought to my attention we tracked down the problem and corrected it.

More or less the heat we had the week prior caused some shifting with the bracket and mount locations of the start line sensors causing the angles to be off. When we checked the roll out and reaction of the sensors that morning, everything checked out as the height, distance, and settings were all the same. The angle caused the sensor to look half at the sensor across the track and half at the wooden box which caused it to sometimes work just fine but other times to not react until it got the second pulse from the rear tires.

Again, sorry for the issues and thanks again to everyone who came out and raced.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/316392https://fargostreet.com/post/316392Thu, 25 Jul 2013 02:56:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Fargostreet TOP 1/4 mile times on Thu, 25 Jul 2013 02:02:28 GMT]]>I should of came and raced! Lol

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/316391https://fargostreet.com/post/316391Thu, 25 Jul 2013 02:02:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Fargostreet TOP 1/4 mile times on Wed, 24 Jul 2013 13:38:35 GMT]]>Ok, that's good to know, at least I know my 1.631 60' was real. If I hadn't missed the 2>3 shift that run it could've easily been my fastest... D'oh!

An annoucement would've let racers know to avoid that lane, but if it was corrected right after it was reported it wouldn't have made any difference.

Glad it was corrected quickly.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/316389https://fargostreet.com/post/316389Wed, 24 Jul 2013 13:38:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Fargostreet TOP 1/4 mile times on Wed, 24 Jul 2013 12:41:28 GMT]]>No, it was not all day. It was corrected as soon as it was found.

The issue was found when some racers brought it to our attention that their time slips didn't seem correct. The time frame seems to be roughly between 3:30 and 4:15.

What would an announcement have done?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/316388https://fargostreet.com/post/316388Wed, 24 Jul 2013 12:41:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Fargostreet TOP 1/4 mile times on Tue, 23 Jul 2013 14:04:02 GMT]]>

2wheeler;328176 wrote:
I'm gonna need you to post up your quickest time in the right (spectator) lane for comparison. The timing lights in the left lane weren't working correctly during the time you made these runs.(the timers didnt start until the REAR wheels tripped the staging beams) We had to disallow many of the bike qualifying times due to this. We had many bikes that usually 60 foot in the mid/low 1.4s, have slips that showed mid 1.3s, and ETs that were 1.5 tenths quicker they had ever run.WTF.

Were the Top End guys aware of the issue? Nobody thought it would be cool to make an announcement that they were having problems? What was the time period they were malfunctioning? All day?

My best run in the spectator lane was a 13.098@104.98, which was my fastest trap, but I had a just average 60' of 1.859.

I also had two bad 330' splits.

60' times in the left lane:
1:03pm - 1.631
1:07pm - 1.883
4:02pm - 1.502
4:06pm - 1.584
4:11pm - 1.891
5:15pm - 1.824
5:19pm - 1.826

If you throw out the 3? bad ones I had better times last year.

Breaking down the video, it looks like you're right. Pretty hard to tell, but the 60' looks more like 1.8 and the ET 13+.

Shit.

legacy image

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/316386https://fargostreet.com/post/316386Tue, 23 Jul 2013 14:04:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Fargostreet TOP 1/4 mile times on Tue, 23 Jul 2013 12:48:46 GMT]]>I'm gonna need you to post up your quickest time in the right (spectator) lane for comparison. The timing lights in the left lane weren't working correctly during the time you made these runs.(the timers didnt start until the REAR wheels tripped the staging beams) We had to disallow many of the bike qualifying times due to this. We had many bikes that usually 60 foot in the mid/low 1.4s, have slips that showed mid 1.3s, and ETs that were 1.5 tenths quicker they had ever run.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/316385https://fargostreet.com/post/316385Tue, 23 Jul 2013 12:48:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Fargostreet TOP 1/4 mile times on Tue, 23 Jul 2013 03:16:25 GMT]]>EDIT
Timing system malfunction, see below.
EDIT

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/316384https://fargostreet.com/post/316384Tue, 23 Jul 2013 03:16:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Fargostreet TOP 1/4 mile times on Mon, 22 Jul 2013 22:46:27 GMT]]>Nice 60ft man

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/316383https://fargostreet.com/post/316383Mon, 22 Jul 2013 22:46:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Fargostreet TOP 1/4 mile times on Sun, 21 Jul 2013 00:01:09 GMT]]>EDIT
Timing system malfunction, see below. :icon_shaking2:
EDIT

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/316382https://fargostreet.com/post/316382Sun, 21 Jul 2013 00:01:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Fargostreet TOP 1/4 mile times on Sun, 24 Feb 2013 00:14:49 GMT]]>wouldnt hurt to make another thread for a yearly top 10/20, then have an all time top 10.
problem with that is finding someone with enough patience and time to do it.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/316184https://fargostreet.com/post/316184Sun, 24 Feb 2013 00:14:49 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Fargostreet TOP 1/4 mile times on Mon, 28 Jan 2013 22:37:58 GMT]]>83 mercury capri best for 2012
9.28@146

should get 8's next year

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/316070https://fargostreet.com/post/316070Mon, 28 Jan 2013 22:37:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Fargostreet TOP 1/4 mile times on Wed, 23 Jan 2013 23:56:12 GMT]]>

Grr;327793 wrote:
good spot, right next to you

Zing! Good eye Gary!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/316023https://fargostreet.com/post/316023Wed, 23 Jan 2013 23:56:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Fargostreet TOP 1/4 mile times on Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:56:45 GMT]]>not particularly, but its pretty retarded to take the time removing everyone off the bottom and leave 4 year old times on it. At least some of the people that were on it have participated in the last year or 2

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/316008https://fargostreet.com/post/316008Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:56:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Fargostreet TOP 1/4 mile times on Wed, 23 Jan 2013 04:08:49 GMT]]>Do you really care about a list on a forum where a total of 10 people post in any given year? Lol....

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/316006https://fargostreet.com/post/316006Wed, 23 Jan 2013 04:08:49 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Fargostreet TOP 1/4 mile times on Wed, 23 Jan 2013 02:22:40 GMT]]>good spot, right next to you

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/316004https://fargostreet.com/post/316004Wed, 23 Jan 2013 02:22:40 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Fargostreet TOP 1/4 mile times on Wed, 23 Jan 2013 01:39:37 GMT]]>Awww, thanks for your input Gary. I'll be sure to file it under 'No one gives a fuck'. Thanks.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/316002https://fargostreet.com/post/316002Wed, 23 Jan 2013 01:39:37 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Fargostreet TOP 1/4 mile times on Wed, 23 Jan 2013 01:00:15 GMT]]>well thats pretty gay, that kid with the camaro, zac and myself are the only 2012 times on that list now. If it isnt current GTFO bunch of has been cars on there that dont even exist from members that havent been online for years. what a joke

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/315998https://fargostreet.com/post/315998Wed, 23 Jan 2013 01:00:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Fargostreet TOP 1/4 mile times on Tue, 22 Jan 2013 01:17:14 GMT]]>The list has been changed to a top 20 list for cars, and a top 10 list for bikes. If you have updated times, post them up.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/315995https://fargostreet.com/post/315995Tue, 22 Jan 2013 01:17:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Fargostreet TOP 1/4 mile times on Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:23:52 GMT]]>1993 mustang gt w/ 125 shot
12.2@114

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/315588https://fargostreet.com/post/315588Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:23:52 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Fargostreet TOP 1/4 mile times on Mon, 24 Sep 2012 12:27:56 GMT]]>2000 camaro N/A ls1
11.41@120

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/315587https://fargostreet.com/post/315587Mon, 24 Sep 2012 12:27:56 GMT