<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[New Dyno Numbers!!!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I was looking for more power but I'll be happy with this for now..</p>
<p dir="auto">Runs were @ 40.5 psi<br />
My base run was @ 505 ish the way I ran 10.51@135</p>
<p dir="auto"><img src="/assets/uploads/legacy/attachments/6437/DD%2041psi.jpg" alt="DD 41psi.jpg" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /><br />
<img src="/assets/uploads/legacy/attachments/6438/DD%2041psi%20corrected.jpg" alt="DD 41psi corrected.jpg" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /><br />
<img src="/assets/uploads/legacy/attachments/6439/DD%2041psi%20hp%20trq.jpg" alt="DD 41psi hp trq.jpg" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/topic/19557/new-dyno-numbers</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 22:50:32 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://fargostreet.com/topic/19557.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 16:49:03 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to New Dyno Numbers!!! on Tue, 10 Aug 2010 19:06:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">His correction factor has nothing to do w/ temp/humidity.  The only purpose of the correction chart is to display roughly what it would put down on a Dynojet for those who do not understand the concept of the Dyno Dynamics and Mustang dynos.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/303019</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/303019</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[PSI2HI]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 19:06:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to New Dyno Numbers!!! on Mon, 09 Aug 2010 16:05:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">zbrown;314524 wrote:<br />
good #'s regardless, but i have a question. I am no dyno expert so that is why i ask how come there is such a big difference in corrected to uncorrected? Is that normal?</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Not saying this is the case, but many places will put the IAT sensor near something a bit warmer as well in order to get the corrected numbers higher.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/302974</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/302974</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[inspector01]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 16:05:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to New Dyno Numbers!!! on Sat, 07 Aug 2010 17:03:55 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">normally you see corrected.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/302921</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/302921</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[btleier]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 17:03:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to New Dyno Numbers!!! on Sat, 07 Aug 2010 04:23:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Dyno #'s are gay anyway</p>
<p dir="auto">traps are king, and you are making good power for what you trap/weigh</p>
<p dir="auto">edit, yeah and back to corrected vs uncorrected</p>
<p dir="auto">you know you see dyno sheets posted all over the net, are they  typically  corrected or uncorrected?</p>
<p dir="auto">IF you see "SAE horsepower" and "SAE torque" on a sheet does that tell you it is a corrected #?</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/302913</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/302913</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[zbrown]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 04:23:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to New Dyno Numbers!!! on Fri, 06 Aug 2010 17:06:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Grr;314537 wrote:<br />
holy i was drunk last night, lol<br />
that is alot of power, shane really knows his shit.  I know last time i was down there i was very impressed<br />
Im just saying, you have alot of work and parts into that thing, and your pushing the shit out of it to get those #s, hope the trans stays together.  If you put that much effort into a rwd LSx car youd be in the 8s!</p>
<p dir="auto">btw zac mde me do it, lol<br />
My goal is to have a 9 sec. Drag, Road race, auto cross car.. (4-Door Sedan) Street car<br />
I know im still some parts away ( slicks, head work)</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/302891</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/302891</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[aliengotpsi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 17:06:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to New Dyno Numbers!!! on Fri, 06 Aug 2010 15:44:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">holy i was drunk last night, lol<br />
that is alot of power, shane really knows his shit.  I know last time i was down there i was very impressed<br />
Im just saying, you have alot of work and parts into that thing, and your pushing the shit out of it to get those #s, hope the trans stays together.  If you put that much effort into a rwd LSx car youd be in the 8s!</p>
<p dir="auto">btw zac mde me do it, lol</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/302886</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/302886</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Grr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 15:44:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to New Dyno Numbers!!! on Fri, 06 Aug 2010 15:01:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Grr;314516 wrote:<br />
i would have lied and said it was like 28psi, thats so not impressive or im drunk (which i am) but still, i think zac makes that on like 8-10psi? I know i made over 600whp on 12psi with a stock motor?</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">That is on the far extreme end of apples to oranges....  How do you even come across trying to compare a 6L w/ a 78mm to a 2L w/ a 62mm?</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/302883</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/302883</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[PSI2HI]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 15:01:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to New Dyno Numbers!!! on Fri, 06 Aug 2010 14:42:51 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">zbrown;314524 wrote:<br />
decimal the wrong way, i have 210 hp</p>
<p dir="auto">good #'s regardless, but i have a question. I am no dyno expert so that is why i ask how come there is such a big difference in corrected to uncorrected? Is that normal?</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">DB has their corrected numbers set up to (dynojets readings) You will never have anyone break a Hp record on a Mustang or Dynodynamics. Dyno's are a tuning tool.. I came in to Db making 505- drove off the dyno making 610 un-corrected. But have already made 667 on speed techs dynojet.. on way less boost.. If you want a big dyno number go to a Dynojet</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/302880</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/302880</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[aliengotpsi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 14:42:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to New Dyno Numbers!!! on Fri, 06 Aug 2010 14:35:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Grr;314516 wrote:<br />
i would have lied and said it was like 28psi, thats so not impressive or im drunk (which i am) but still, i think zac makes that on like 8-10psi?  I know i made over 600whp on 12psi with a stock motor?</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Grr you must be drunk... What is the highest hp 4 cylinder in town? prob. Matts Delso making 726hp on a 2wd Dyno Jet. If he were to go to RSmotors ( Mustang Dyno) Or DB Performance( Dyno Dynamics) he woulda made 620 ish So is that impressive? I think so.</p>
<p dir="auto">I guess Id like to know what is impressive for a 2.0L?  You made 600hp on a dyno jet which is like 520 on a dyno-dynamics.</p>
<p dir="auto">Some of you have heard of David Buschur? He has a Evo 8 RS making 710hp @ 43 psi on his Mustang dyno and runs  9.0 @ 159 ( Full Street Car, With full Interior)<br />
<a href="http://forums.evolutionm.net/evo-show-shine/488050-davids-rs-bad-bish-photoshoot.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://forums.evolutionm.net/evo-show-shine/488050-davids-rs-bad-bish-photoshoot.html</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/302879</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/302879</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[aliengotpsi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 14:35:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to New Dyno Numbers!!! on Fri, 06 Aug 2010 13:13:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Correction depends on the conditions when you dyno, the correction factor "compensates" so that you get a hp reading based on a certain temperature/atm conditions.  If it's really hot when you dyno the correction adds a bunch of HP, if it's really cool when you dyno the correction subtracts a bunch of HP.  I'm guessing it was really hot when they dyno'd.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/302875</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/302875</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[DaveH]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 13:13:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to New Dyno Numbers!!! on Fri, 06 Aug 2010 12:19:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">decimal the wrong way, i have 210 hp</p>
<p dir="auto">good #'s regardless, but i have a question. I am no dyno expert so that is why i ask how come there is such a big difference in corrected to uncorrected? Is that normal?</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/302873</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/302873</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[zbrown]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 12:19:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to New Dyno Numbers!!! on Fri, 06 Aug 2010 12:07:38 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hmm, how big is your and Zac's engines?  3 times the size.  Therefore, you should be making 2,100 hp?  Haha, I'm just kidding.  Can't wait to see this baby run.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/302872</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/302872</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[91nbtsi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 12:07:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to New Dyno Numbers!!! on Fri, 06 Aug 2010 05:40:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">i would have lied and said it was like 28psi, thats so not impressive or im drunk (which i am) but still, i think zac makes that on like 8-10psi?  I know i made over 600whp on 12psi with a stock motor?</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/302868</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/302868</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Grr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 05:40:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to New Dyno Numbers!!! on Thu, 05 Aug 2010 19:20:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I run E85</p>
<p dir="auto">Might need E98 for the 50 lbs I want to run... lol</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/302846</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/302846</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[aliengotpsi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 19:20:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to New Dyno Numbers!!! on Thu, 05 Aug 2010 17:59:04 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">very nice,  do you run race gas in it or E85?</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/302840</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/302840</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[DaveH]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 17:59:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to New Dyno Numbers!!! on Thu, 05 Aug 2010 17:43:57 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Not too shabby.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/302834</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/302834</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bookem]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 17:43:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to New Dyno Numbers!!! on Thu, 05 Aug 2010 17:13:18 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Nice numbers kevin.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/302829</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/302829</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[DrifterExtreme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 17:13:18 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>