DaveH;320868 wrote:
Truth.

But, the one that is in control deserves to have more shit flung at them.

trump/palin

romney/pawlenty

this race is comedy gold

burnteclipse;320714 wrote:
okay so i admit i may be a troll on this site...honestly im a pretty decent guy with moderate views....but this whole political debate seems strung out...i mean honestly those of you "hate obama"....what about your everyday life has changed, really?...taxes? unlikely...im willing to bet not alot of avid posters on this site make enough money to to really see a difference in that..(i have no experience with business taxes, so i am not nieve to there being a difference there)...this is not three years in the making. I posted something about bitter republicans and was torn apart...is it really that far from the truth? explain to me why a bill for 9/11 service workers benefits was passed on by republicans?...i may be misinformed so enlighten me...where does every "well informed" poster on this site get there unbias perspective...and please dont be a link to fox news or a glen beck donation site....

You're not a troll. You are just an uninformed simpleton.

Trafik Jamz;320866 wrote:
Both parties suck.

Truth.

But, the one that is in control deserves to have more shit flung at them.

/thread

Debt Jumped $54.1 Billion in 8 Days Preceding Obama-Boehner Deal to Cut $38.5 Billion for Rest of Year

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/debt-jumped-54-billion-8-days-preceding

DaveH;320717 wrote:
If you really want to know the probs that the R's had with HR 847,scoot down to the "additional information/member concerns".

http://www.gop.gov/bill/111/2/hr847

Nobody has "unbiased" perspective... the definition of "perspective" includes your bias.

Some Members may be concerned about several issues:

  1. H.R. 847 creates a new entitlement program.  

well that is easy, dont call it an entitlement. call it a subsidy like they do for farmers and oil companies.

http://www.gop.gov/bill/111/2/hr847

Nobody has "unbiased" perspective... the definition of "perspective" includes your bias.

burnteclipse;320714 wrote:
okay so i admit i may be a troll on this site...honestly im a pretty decent guy with moderate views....but this whole political debate seems strung out...i mean honestly those of you "hate obama"....what about your everyday life has changed, really?...taxes? unlikely...im willing to bet not alot of avid posters on this site make enough money to to really see a difference in that..(i have no experience with business taxes, so i am not nieve to there being a difference there)...this is not three years in the making. I posted something about bitter republicans and was torn apart...is it really that far from the truth? explain to me why a bill for 9/11 service workers benefits was passed on by republicans?...i may be misinformed so enlighten me...where does every "well informed" poster on this site get there unbias perspective...and please dont be a link to fox news or a glen beck donation site....

Goodnbuzzd;320577 wrote:
I'm glad you enjoy your hope and change.... Fuck Obama and the retards that voted for him. :icon_shaking:

yea, all 64 million of you can go to hell.

burnteclipse;320435 wrote:
the one...the only...flamer that goes against the grain....i must admit i do come back from time to time and input my opinion...

You said it. Judging by your posts I'm inclined to agree with you being a flamer. Maybe a cock smoker too.

I'm glad you enjoy your hope and change.... Fuck Obama and the retards that voted for him. :icon_shaking:

burnteclipse;320435 wrote:
the one...the only...flamer that goes against the grain....i must admit i do come back from time to time and input my opinion...

are u proud of being one of the few brainwashed ppl left that haven't realized how shitty obama is yet? if so i'm really sorry

Trafik Jamz;315817 wrote:
Any bill that tries to regulate morality (censorship, drug laws...things of that nature) and try to enforce the views of a church/religion on a diverse group of "free" people.
You mean stuff like abortion laws, suicide laws, smoking bans, prostitution, gun bans, and the like? Except for suicide (and abortion, to some degree), none of those are moral issues, they're all control issues.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/big-sis-to-get-expanded-role-in-policing-internet.html

Two cybersecurity bills that would hand President Obama the power to shut down parts of the Internet in the event of a national emergency have now been merged into a single unified piece of legislation that Democrats will try to pass before the end of the year, with the Department of Homeland Security being given a larger role in policing the world wide web.
Under the new draft bill, which is a combination of the two versions originally crafted by Senators Joe Lieberman and Jay Rockefeller, Janet Napolitano’s DHS will be handed broader authority to determine how to handle potential cybersecurity threats.
“DHS will get expanded authorities. I think that’s clear,” said James Lewis, a cybersecurity expert with think tank Center for Strategic and International Studies, who has studied the new bill.
An expanded role for Homeland Security would be somewhat ironic given the fact that the DHS itself recently failed an extensive cyber-security audit conducted by the agency’s own Inspector General.
“The DHS US-CERT office is currently plagued by at least 600 vulnerabilities that could compromise sensitive data, including 202 which have been classified as high-risk,” reported TG Daily.
Homeland Security’s failure to adequately secure its own internal network will lead to questions about why the agency should be given vast new authority to secure America’s cyber assets and the public Internet.
Democrats want to get the bill passed within the next four weeks, although “sticking points” could delay the legislation, according to a Senate aide familiar with the bill. However, lawmakers are determined to put the package up for a vote before the end of the year.