<![CDATA[Clutch]]>Thinking about getting a new clutch... any ideas?... i was think a act 2600 but i dont know.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/2025/clutchRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 09:04:06 GMTTue, 22 Mar 2005 00:12:14 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Clutch on Sat, 26 Mar 2005 02:11:19 GMT]]>thats true

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/37169https://fargostreet.com/post/37169Sat, 26 Mar 2005 02:11:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Clutch on Wed, 23 Mar 2005 18:54:31 GMT]]>

97Cav wrote:
who cares, i'm thinking of boosting my car, and i has 217,xxx miles on it., if it blows up, rebuild it man.
thats right if your in the scene you got to experience failure of different things, and the more stuff fails the more you learn

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/36568https://fargostreet.com/post/36568Wed, 23 Mar 2005 18:54:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Clutch on Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:47:23 GMT]]>Now there is the attitude.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/36497https://fargostreet.com/post/36497Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:47:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Clutch on Wed, 23 Mar 2005 13:31:58 GMT]]>

amicheze wrote:
unless the car was VERY well cared for.. i imagine slapping a turbo on a motor with 153k miles isnt the best idea if you want it to run for a while.

who cares, i'm thinking of boosting my car, and i has 217,xxx miles on it., if it blows up, rebuild it man.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/36483https://fargostreet.com/post/36483Wed, 23 Mar 2005 13:31:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Clutch on Wed, 23 Mar 2005 07:12:19 GMT]]>unless the car was VERY well cared for.. i imagine slapping a turbo on a motor with 153k miles isnt the best idea if you want it to run for a while.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/36460https://fargostreet.com/post/36460Wed, 23 Mar 2005 07:12:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Clutch on Wed, 23 Mar 2005 03:37:50 GMT]]>h22 cost>stock motor with turbo

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/36403https://fargostreet.com/post/36403Wed, 23 Mar 2005 03:37:50 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Clutch on Wed, 23 Mar 2005 03:36:16 GMT]]>H22 with a tubo kit...keep it at minimal boost and if you want to go further than that, then have it sleeved with lower comp pistons...and of course the other typical mods that come with more boost...more fuel delivery, bigger exhaust etc. etc.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/36402https://fargostreet.com/post/36402Wed, 23 Mar 2005 03:36:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Clutch on Wed, 23 Mar 2005 03:15:39 GMT]]>good idea

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/36396https://fargostreet.com/post/36396Wed, 23 Mar 2005 03:15:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Clutch on Wed, 23 Mar 2005 02:49:27 GMT]]>just replace the stock motor and turbo it....

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/36384https://fargostreet.com/post/36384Wed, 23 Mar 2005 02:49:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Clutch on Wed, 23 Mar 2005 02:48:20 GMT]]>^that would be a good reason...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/36382https://fargostreet.com/post/36382Wed, 23 Mar 2005 02:48:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Clutch on Wed, 23 Mar 2005 02:45:45 GMT]]>the only reason i would swap oer a turbo is becaise my car has like 153,000 miles on it if i did a motor swap (it would be like getting a new heart), an h22 only has like 50,000 miles on it thats 103,000 less miles.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/36378https://fargostreet.com/post/36378Wed, 23 Mar 2005 02:45:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Clutch on Wed, 23 Mar 2005 02:35:20 GMT]]>

tjamz wrote:
I can hardly feel my clutch, its like its not even there...

your weird

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/36369https://fargostreet.com/post/36369Wed, 23 Mar 2005 02:35:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Clutch on Wed, 23 Mar 2005 02:35:00 GMT]]>I never understood why somebody would h22swap over a turbo.....

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/36368https://fargostreet.com/post/36368Wed, 23 Mar 2005 02:35:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Clutch on Wed, 23 Mar 2005 02:32:37 GMT]]>see now i know a few guys with a 2600 and one of them was way heavier than the others... Tom did you ever feel Haas's i think his felt heavier than yours.... but back to my first question H22 or Turbo... witch one would be a less hasel?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/36365https://fargostreet.com/post/36365Wed, 23 Mar 2005 02:32:37 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Clutch on Wed, 23 Mar 2005 02:31:36 GMT]]>I can hardly feel my clutch, its like its not even there...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/36364https://fargostreet.com/post/36364Wed, 23 Mar 2005 02:31:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Clutch on Wed, 23 Mar 2005 02:24:28 GMT]]>I know how you feel...except mine is heavier then any other clutch I have ever felt, aftermarket or not. Its not fair.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/36360https://fargostreet.com/post/36360Wed, 23 Mar 2005 02:24:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Clutch on Wed, 23 Mar 2005 02:20:32 GMT]]>

92BlackTT wrote:
2600 does not sound like a fun clutch for a daily driver. I have a 2100 and I dont keep it in gear through a stop light.....

hell my stock clutch is heavier than any other stock clutch ive ever driven. i dont keep mine in at a light either. i cant imagine what a 2600 must be like.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/36354https://fargostreet.com/post/36354Wed, 23 Mar 2005 02:20:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Clutch on Wed, 23 Mar 2005 02:16:07 GMT]]>

PSiedTSi wrote:
you pussy i rock the 2900 🙂
'
dont call me a pussy..you and I both know my 2100's pedal pressure is twice your 2900.

sorry to whore

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/36351https://fargostreet.com/post/36351Wed, 23 Mar 2005 02:16:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Clutch on Wed, 23 Mar 2005 01:37:49 GMT]]>Dylan you've driven my 2600...you know you like it 😉 I like it too and ive gotten really used to it...just sometimes after long cruises my knee will be a little sore but no big deal. I realized just how much im used to it after I got back in my old car and almost pushed the pedal through the floor 😛

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/36339https://fargostreet.com/post/36339Wed, 23 Mar 2005 01:37:49 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Clutch on Tue, 22 Mar 2005 23:59:06 GMT]]>so what do you guys think would be a less hassel in having to fix things an H22 or a turbo?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/36302https://fargostreet.com/post/36302Tue, 22 Mar 2005 23:59:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Clutch on Tue, 22 Mar 2005 22:33:41 GMT]]>

92BlackTT wrote:
2600 does not sound like a fun clutch for a daily driver. I have a 2100 and I dont keep it in gear through a stop light.....

you pussy i rock the 2900 🙂

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/36288https://fargostreet.com/post/36288Tue, 22 Mar 2005 22:33:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Clutch on Tue, 22 Mar 2005 21:26:07 GMT]]>Back on the clutch, i have a 2600, and it is just fine, in fact i don't even have the street disk, i have the 6 puck, unsprung. It's streetable. It's not alot of fun, but it's streetable. On that whole blowing up thing, i'm with jim, throw a bunch-o parts at it and don't tune it......then it'll blow. Sure stuff will happen form time to time, usually due to user error, and such.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/36266https://fargostreet.com/post/36266Tue, 22 Mar 2005 21:26:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Clutch on Tue, 22 Mar 2005 19:59:44 GMT]]>I don't doubt that people drive their boosted hondas every day, and that is fine with me if tufte still runs that car, the issue that i was stating doesn't just have to deal with boosting a car.

Simply what I was stating was that once people start modifing cars, shit will go wrong eventually. Thrings break, if they didn't then there wouldn't be any need for replacement parts.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/36254https://fargostreet.com/post/36254Tue, 22 Mar 2005 19:59:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Clutch on Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:56:40 GMT]]>i agree ...if you get a 2600...and yo drive ur car daily....your left leg will be twice the size of ur right after a couple weeks of driving.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/36187https://fargostreet.com/post/36187Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:56:40 GMT