<![CDATA[New Personal Best]]>I at least gave Bill a little bit of a run this time. Thanks to Charlie for having a hooking track, I cut a 1.15 60' 🙂

Video:

http://youtu.be/XWt_F9v9c88

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/20612/new-personal-bestRSS for NodeWed, 27 May 2026 22:55:56 GMTMon, 26 Sep 2011 02:29:58 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to New Personal Best on Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:47:04 GMT]]>awesome Dave!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/313458https://fargostreet.com/post/313458Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:47:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Personal Best on Tue, 18 Oct 2011 04:25:16 GMT]]>Timeslip scanned finally.

![legacy image](http://www.boostwerx.com/Blurr2011/7.77 @ 176.jpg)

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/313454https://fargostreet.com/post/313454Tue, 18 Oct 2011 04:25:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Personal Best on Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:32:30 GMT]]>Well to hit 141 in 4.99 that's averaging 1.287G, so you can imagine what the launch and 60' felt like...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/313282https://fargostreet.com/post/313282Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:32:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Personal Best on Mon, 26 Sep 2011 22:40:12 GMT]]>I would be neat to know how may G's of force you experianced!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/313280https://fargostreet.com/post/313280Mon, 26 Sep 2011 22:40:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Personal Best on Mon, 26 Sep 2011 20:30:54 GMT]]>Nice work with the track Charlie!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/313278https://fargostreet.com/post/313278Mon, 26 Sep 2011 20:30:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Personal Best on Mon, 26 Sep 2011 20:07:47 GMT]]>

DaveH;325034 wrote:
It would be interesting to see a different angle. I'm not sure how far the front end carried but I suppose the 60' beam could have been tripped by the rears?

It's hard to say, from were I was standing it looked like you were well past the tree before the front was back down, but its diseaving from that angle as well sometimes.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/313277https://fargostreet.com/post/313277Mon, 26 Sep 2011 20:07:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Personal Best on Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:02:23 GMT]]>It would be interesting to see a different angle. I'm not sure how far the front end carried but I suppose the 60' beam could have been tripped by the rears?

Top End;325026 wrote:
Lol, that view doesn't do it justice. Let's just say there may be some debate on what part of the car tripped the 60' beams.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/313275https://fargostreet.com/post/313275Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:02:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Personal Best on Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:13:01 GMT]]>Charlie had the track hooking up for sure. I had my best 60ft (1.16) and best ET (8.14) and best trap (173) all the same day as well. I tried to spray my nitrous as well the whole way to get that 7, but the results weren't the same. I came out of the hole and spun and had to get out and get back in it and it still ran a 8.19@173. I think Dave is running a 150 shot for spool and I got a 225 shot in mine...or 200..I can't remember. Great job to the guys at Top End!!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/313272https://fargostreet.com/post/313272Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:13:01 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Personal Best on Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:37:39 GMT]]>Lol, that view doesn't do it justice. Let's just say there may be some debate on what part of the car tripped the 60' beams.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/313267https://fargostreet.com/post/313267Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:37:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Personal Best on Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:15:18 GMT]]>

zbrown;325023 wrote:
Nice work Dave!

I can't believe it looked so tame and still had that 60

I'm with him, it looked really clean coming off the line. How did it feel?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/313265https://fargostreet.com/post/313265Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:15:18 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Personal Best on Mon, 26 Sep 2011 12:56:45 GMT]]>Nice work Dave!

I can't believe it looked so tame and still had that 60

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/313264https://fargostreet.com/post/313264Mon, 26 Sep 2011 12:56:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Personal Best on Mon, 26 Sep 2011 12:54:12 GMT]]>the timeslip says 4.99 @ 141 in the eighth. 🙂

I don't think the mph is down, my car just pulls really hard through the short times, so it ET's good for the mph it runs.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/313263https://fargostreet.com/post/313263Mon, 26 Sep 2011 12:54:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Personal Best on Mon, 26 Sep 2011 11:45:01 GMT]]>jesus, did I see a 4.99@136 in the 1/8?? WOW

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/313262https://fargostreet.com/post/313262Mon, 26 Sep 2011 11:45:01 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Personal Best on Mon, 26 Sep 2011 05:42:35 GMT]]>Congrats
Seems your mph is low though?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/313260https://fargostreet.com/post/313260Mon, 26 Sep 2011 05:42:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Personal Best on Mon, 26 Sep 2011 03:56:21 GMT]]>Wholy bawls... very nice! Congrats

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/313259https://fargostreet.com/post/313259Mon, 26 Sep 2011 03:56:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Personal Best on Mon, 26 Sep 2011 03:18:05 GMT]]>Congrats again Dave 🙂

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/313258https://fargostreet.com/post/313258Mon, 26 Sep 2011 03:18:05 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Personal Best on Mon, 26 Sep 2011 03:00:14 GMT]]>Nice.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/313257https://fargostreet.com/post/313257Mon, 26 Sep 2011 03:00:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Personal Best on Mon, 26 Sep 2011 03:00:13 GMT]]>Nice run Mr. Henry

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/313256https://fargostreet.com/post/313256Mon, 26 Sep 2011 03:00:13 GMT