<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[new nhra rules for e85-98?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Just read over on another forum the NHRA is considering these fuels in the same category as alcohol. Any supercharged/turbocharged car running 9.99 or faster is required to have a sfi 3.2a/15 suit or pants and jacket and 3.2a/5 gloves and boots.</p>
<p dir="auto">is this true if i mix the fuel down to E70 or so?</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/topic/20799/new-nhra-rules-for-e85-98</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 21:39:13 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://fargostreet.com/topic/20799.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:41:22 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to new nhra rules for e85-98? on Thu, 15 Mar 2012 00:41:38 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Put in a call to Div 5 Tech director.  He is looking into were the mark for Ethanol content is to be considered alcohol.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/314704</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/314704</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Top End]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 00:41:38 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>