<![CDATA[G-Tech]]>I have a fairly old G-Tech that I've always used to test differences between mods on a car. It's no replacement for the track or timeslip of course and I'm not quite ready to run my new car at the track just yet (next year for sure) but I am wondering how accurate this one is.

I'm looking for someone who has a known (timeslip available) low 16 or high 15 second car willing to do a couple of G-Tech runs to see what you get. I'd like to see the difference between your track time and what the G-Tech says. Right now my best is a 15.77@91.5MPH and a 0-60 of 7.37. This seems a bit too good to be true for a 3400lbs car putting ~168HP to the wheels.

PM me if you're interested.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/323/g-techRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 15:30:32 GMTThu, 26 Aug 2004 22:33:45 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to G-Tech on Sun, 20 Mar 2005 02:34:56 GMT]]>talk to harwood, he ran like a 16.8x or somthin...idk if you wanna use it in a high 16's car, but i figured id mention it...peace

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/35734https://fargostreet.com/post/35734Sun, 20 Mar 2005 02:34:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to G-Tech on Sat, 19 Mar 2005 21:35:45 GMT]]>I would to try it out on my car. Maybe we could do it on the next cruise or something.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/35703https://fargostreet.com/post/35703Sat, 19 Mar 2005 21:35:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to G-Tech on Sat, 19 Mar 2005 21:09:00 GMT]]>Just got back from another G-Tech run, missed the 0-60 time trying to hit the 2-3 shift but I ran a 15.77 while bouncing off the rev limiter, 15.5? and finally a 15.44@94.1MPH. That's 3 tenths better than last fall. Only thing to change is mileage from 1000 to 11900, me thinks my engine is finally broken in 🙂 Can't wait to run it at the track!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/35701https://fargostreet.com/post/35701Sat, 19 Mar 2005 21:09:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to G-Tech on Tue, 31 Aug 2004 19:11:06 GMT]]>aight... yeah, I'm going to try and make some more runs in the cool weather... so assuming it doesn't snow within 2 weeks (cringe) ....

(hrm, looking at schedule, doesn't look like I"ve got much time..... damn)

(might shoot for the 11th-12th weekend assuming I get my camping gear out of my car before then)

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/3803https://fargostreet.com/post/3803Tue, 31 Aug 2004 19:11:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to G-Tech on Tue, 31 Aug 2004 19:06:31 GMT]]>That would be perfect.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/3801https://fargostreet.com/post/3801Tue, 31 Aug 2004 19:06:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to G-Tech on Tue, 31 Aug 2004 19:02:42 GMT]]>that buddy is way up in N. MN.....

if I make it out to the track again this year, I'll let you know. Can throw it in my car if nothing else and match it to a timeslip....

-jw

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/3799https://fargostreet.com/post/3799Tue, 31 Aug 2004 19:02:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to G-Tech on Fri, 27 Aug 2004 18:36:58 GMT]]>Maybe it'd work better if I test mine against that one at the same time.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/3501https://fargostreet.com/post/3501Fri, 27 Aug 2004 18:36:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to G-Tech on Fri, 27 Aug 2004 04:53:29 GMT]]>you'd have to have someone make the pass on the track to have an accurate comparison (hell, weather alone has made over a half second difference in my times)

BUT, I do have a buddy that HAS run a good comparison and his Gtech was 0.2 off of the timeslip.

-jw

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/3473https://fargostreet.com/post/3473Fri, 27 Aug 2004 04:53:29 GMT