<![CDATA[turbo stang 1000hp]]>http://www.centralfloridaturbo.com/videos/williesmustang.wmv

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/3736/turbo-stang-1000hpRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 03:49:27 GMTSat, 20 Aug 2005 17:20:24 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to turbo stang 1000hp on Thu, 22 Sep 2005 03:42:51 GMT]]>i was more impressed with the civic that ran 10.46....that is badass

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/70321https://fargostreet.com/post/70321Thu, 22 Sep 2005 03:42:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to turbo stang 1000hp on Wed, 21 Sep 2005 02:09:57 GMT]]>

MisterCMK wrote:
I do things the opposite way, I am building up the suspension on my stang before I throw a lotta power at it. I want to be able to make use of all the power.

You know what you are talking about. Compared to other cars, the Mustangs have enough power to start out with, but the chassis stiffness and suspension responds beautifully to some work.

Believe it or not, if you are willing to spend the $$$ for Maximum Motorsports "grip in a box" kit, you will be able to outhandle most Italian sports cars.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/70041https://fargostreet.com/post/70041Wed, 21 Sep 2005 02:09:57 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to turbo stang 1000hp on Tue, 20 Sep 2005 22:17:59 GMT]]>

StangerBanger96 wrote:
i wouldnt really know but from what it sounds like.....one of the first things to do to a mustang after you give it decent power is to pretty much get a whole new suspension setup because the stock one sucks.

I do things the opposite way, I am building up the suspension on my stang before I throw a lotta power at it. I want to be able to make use of all the power.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/69995https://fargostreet.com/post/69995Tue, 20 Sep 2005 22:17:59 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to turbo stang 1000hp on Mon, 22 Aug 2005 22:23:27 GMT]]>well the only thing i can say to all is. its a street driven car. there is lil suspension work and he says it stayin that way.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/63775https://fargostreet.com/post/63775Mon, 22 Aug 2005 22:23:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to turbo stang 1000hp on Mon, 22 Aug 2005 18:28:38 GMT]]>i wouldnt really know but from what it sounds like.....one of the first things to do to a mustang after you give it decent power is to pretty much get a whole new suspension setup because the stock one sucks.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/63730https://fargostreet.com/post/63730Mon, 22 Aug 2005 18:28:38 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to turbo stang 1000hp on Mon, 22 Aug 2005 13:26:58 GMT]]>

PSiedTSi wrote:
thats the talk around the 240 boards too...stock suspension on the dragstrip is the best

Would be tough to get my stock suspension from my fwd to work in my rwd conversion. LOL j/k

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/63694https://fargostreet.com/post/63694Mon, 22 Aug 2005 13:26:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to turbo stang 1000hp on Mon, 22 Aug 2005 06:42:30 GMT]]>

camzaro28 wrote:
out of there best times the stang did have the fastest time. 10.1 to 10.3 for the civic

i thought the best he had in the video was 10.9?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/63680https://fargostreet.com/post/63680Mon, 22 Aug 2005 06:42:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to turbo stang 1000hp on Mon, 22 Aug 2005 04:03:34 GMT]]>

camzaro28 wrote:
maybe it didnt say in the vid, but them runs were at 13psi. the dyno was on 25-30. he will be goin back to the track sept26th. them runs were with no rollcage if u didnt notice. its a street car, lol. he actually drives it everyday for the most part.

is that an IRS car?

and yeah, there are things that need to be fixed.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/63659https://fargostreet.com/post/63659Mon, 22 Aug 2005 04:03:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to turbo stang 1000hp on Mon, 22 Aug 2005 02:38:00 GMT]]>Hmmm so at 13 psi he is at 600 whp and runs 139 mph? That doesn't add up.

He was definitely struggling launching the car, he needs to get rid of the manual trans. Drop in a auto with a high stall and it will run some numbers...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/63648https://fargostreet.com/post/63648Mon, 22 Aug 2005 02:38:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to turbo stang 1000hp on Sun, 21 Aug 2005 22:04:49 GMT]]>It looks like there's waaayyyy to much hp for the car as it sits. Definately needs to have some other work done to the car. Even if he did drive/launch it decent (which he didn't), The car still looked like a handfull to drive. If he was at that low a boost, then turning up the boost and getting traction would probably end up with the car darting in to the wall. And it definately could use an auto in there. Don't get me wrong, those were definately nice hp #'s but I actually think he could go as fast with less.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/63622https://fargostreet.com/post/63622Sun, 21 Aug 2005 22:04:49 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to turbo stang 1000hp on Sun, 21 Aug 2005 21:33:46 GMT]]>

camzaro28 wrote:
maybe it didnt say in the vid, but them runs were at 13psi. the dyno was on 25-30. he will be goin back to the track sept26th. them runs were with no rollcage if u didnt notice. its a street car, lol. he actually drives it everyday for the most part.
Even at higher boost it will still spin going down the track. The launches didn't seem to be that great either. I think this Mustang is just a dyno queen.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/63620https://fargostreet.com/post/63620Sun, 21 Aug 2005 21:33:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to turbo stang 1000hp on Sun, 21 Aug 2005 19:43:43 GMT]]>out of there best times the stang did have the fastest time. 10.1 to 10.3 for the civic

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/63612https://fargostreet.com/post/63612Sun, 21 Aug 2005 19:43:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to turbo stang 1000hp on Sun, 21 Aug 2005 19:24:08 GMT]]>Haha, thats great he got it handed to him by a stock lookin civic.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/63607https://fargostreet.com/post/63607Sun, 21 Aug 2005 19:24:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to turbo stang 1000hp on Sun, 21 Aug 2005 19:12:04 GMT]]>maybe it didnt say in the vid, but them runs were at 13psi. the dyno was on 25-30. he will be goin back to the track sept26th. them runs were with no rollcage if u didnt notice. its a street car, lol. he actually drives it everyday for the most part.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/63603https://fargostreet.com/post/63603Sun, 21 Aug 2005 19:12:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to turbo stang 1000hp on Sun, 21 Aug 2005 16:19:37 GMT]]>

DaveH wrote:
g range

He shoulda bought a Supra, then stock suspension works just fine.

😄 😄 😄 😄 😄

thats the talk around the 240 boards too...stock suspension on the dragstrip is the best

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/63589https://fargostreet.com/post/63589Sun, 21 Aug 2005 16:19:37 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to turbo stang 1000hp on Sun, 21 Aug 2005 15:24:11 GMT]]>g range> 2wheeler wrote:

Without proper suspension, single digits wouldn't be easy.

He shoulda bought a Supra, then stock suspension works just fine.

😄 😄 😄 😄 😄

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/63584https://fargostreet.com/post/63584Sun, 21 Aug 2005 15:24:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to turbo stang 1000hp on Sun, 21 Aug 2005 14:48:17 GMT]]>

Bad93ex wrote:
With the horsepower that he has he should be in the single digits easy.
Without proper suspension, single digits wouldn't be easy.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/63583https://fargostreet.com/post/63583Sun, 21 Aug 2005 14:48:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to turbo stang 1000hp on Sun, 21 Aug 2005 13:20:42 GMT]]>i have a feelign that he dosnt knwo how to drive

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/63582https://fargostreet.com/post/63582Sun, 21 Aug 2005 13:20:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to turbo stang 1000hp on Sun, 21 Aug 2005 09:44:22 GMT]]>stilll very sexy 😄

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/63578https://fargostreet.com/post/63578Sun, 21 Aug 2005 09:44:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to turbo stang 1000hp on Sun, 21 Aug 2005 06:34:46 GMT]]>

2wheeler wrote:
Yeah, that car sucked. You guys should show him how it's really done.

Looked like pretty good times for a piss poor 60' and wheelspin all over the track. Let a brother get his setup down, then tell him he sucks.
With the horsepower that he has he should be in the single digits easy.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/63568https://fargostreet.com/post/63568Sun, 21 Aug 2005 06:34:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to turbo stang 1000hp on Sun, 21 Aug 2005 05:43:26 GMT]]>Yeah, that car sucked. You guys should show him how it's really done.

Looked like pretty good times for a piss poor 60' and wheelspin all over the track. Let a brother get his setup down, then tell him he sucks.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/63566https://fargostreet.com/post/63566Sun, 21 Aug 2005 05:43:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to turbo stang 1000hp on Sun, 21 Aug 2005 04:29:42 GMT]]>Hmm I am thinking he must have went through plenty of headaches with that turbo set-up.

IMO for all the HP that that thing has it is weaksauce.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/63560https://fargostreet.com/post/63560Sun, 21 Aug 2005 04:29:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to turbo stang 1000hp on Sun, 21 Aug 2005 03:44:08 GMT]]>yeah i was gunna say, that was sexier than hell but 11's high 10's??

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/63559https://fargostreet.com/post/63559Sun, 21 Aug 2005 03:44:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to turbo stang 1000hp on Sat, 20 Aug 2005 17:50:32 GMT]]>the guy always lies so its hard to tell exactly how many lbs he was running.
he claims that was 13psi, which is 650hp.
the dyno u seen was at 25 or 30 lbs. he will be at the track agon on sept 25th, hopefully running 25lbs

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/63499https://fargostreet.com/post/63499Sat, 20 Aug 2005 17:50:32 GMT