<![CDATA[10.94@125mph!!]]>Warren Stramer ran a 10.94 @ 125.97mph!! He runs the red/maroon fwd laser,4cyl., no wind, 96F. 3500ft adjusted altitude............He thinks with IDEAL conditions it has a 10.78 in it.
legacy image
legacy image

I think that's the fastest fwd in ND?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/3988/10.94@125mphRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 04:22:03 GMTFri, 09 Sep 2005 13:41:25 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to 10.94@125mph!! on Thu, 29 Sep 2005 00:15:47 GMT]]>Had the black AWD DSM. 10.806@133 So, just beat your old time, nothing I can do now that the car is gone;) Goodluck.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/71789https://fargostreet.com/post/71789Thu, 29 Sep 2005 00:15:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 10.94@125mph!! on Wed, 28 Sep 2005 23:54:10 GMT]]>2490lbs., You got the DSM AWD? What do I have to run to beat you? 😄 I just might be at Idrags Sat.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/71782https://fargostreet.com/post/71782Wed, 28 Sep 2005 23:54:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 10.94@125mph!! on Wed, 28 Sep 2005 22:54:46 GMT]]>Nice work! Almost beat me now!! What does your car weigh again?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/71767https://fargostreet.com/post/71767Wed, 28 Sep 2005 22:54:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 10.94@125mph!! on Wed, 28 Sep 2005 22:02:30 GMT]]>Update, Laser goes 10.81 @128.22 at the Div. 5 national open Sept. 23...Oahe Speedway.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/71762https://fargostreet.com/post/71762Wed, 28 Sep 2005 22:02:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 10.94@125mph!! on Sun, 11 Sep 2005 19:58:24 GMT]]>I am #3 still. 😉
I will avenge this with AEM and a good tune damnit.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/67896https://fargostreet.com/post/67896Sun, 11 Sep 2005 19:58:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 10.94@125mph!! on Sun, 11 Sep 2005 15:27:29 GMT]]>

fallguy wrote:
I think if you want to get technical...I'm still have the fastest "streetable" fwd. LOL

I don't remember you having a FWD anymore? 😛

He has some fairly consistent runs there. Autos are nice for that! heh. Congrats to Warren for breaking into the 10's!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/67843https://fargostreet.com/post/67843Sun, 11 Sep 2005 15:27:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 10.94@125mph!! on Sun, 11 Sep 2005 06:33:59 GMT]]>

treimche wrote:
God damn that's impressive! Congrats to him, and yes that is the fastest FWD in the state. Ouch that's gotta hurt.

I think if you want to get technical...I'm still have the fastest "streetable" fwd. LOL

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/67819https://fargostreet.com/post/67819Sun, 11 Sep 2005 06:33:59 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 10.94@125mph!! on Fri, 09 Sep 2005 23:57:13 GMT]]>God damn that's impressive! Congrats to him, and yes that is the fastest FWD in the state. Ouch that's gotta hurt.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/67638https://fargostreet.com/post/67638Fri, 09 Sep 2005 23:57:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 10.94@125mph!! on Fri, 09 Sep 2005 22:16:13 GMT]]>

out there wrote:
so i'm not allowed to make a legitimate observation?
Of course you can......when exactly will you be starting this process?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/67626https://fargostreet.com/post/67626Fri, 09 Sep 2005 22:16:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 10.94@125mph!! on Fri, 09 Sep 2005 20:07:35 GMT]]>thanks, no one has ever explained that to me. now i will be able to avoid looking like a fool... more often

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/67598https://fargostreet.com/post/67598Fri, 09 Sep 2005 20:07:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 10.94@125mph!! on Fri, 09 Sep 2005 18:38:01 GMT]]>

out there wrote:
so i'm not allowed to make a legitimate observation?

legit?

see:

HandoEX wrote:
Reaction doesn't matter in e/t.

like he said, R/T doesn't make a damn bit of differnece with the e/t

he could have cut a .000 light and ran 10.9... he could have cut a 3.400 light and still ran 10.9.

E/T timing starts from the time you close the last staging beam to the time you break the final beams.
R/T is the time from when the Green light is lit to the time that last staging beam light closes again (and your E/T timing starts)

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/67590https://fargostreet.com/post/67590Fri, 09 Sep 2005 18:38:01 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 10.94@125mph!! on Fri, 09 Sep 2005 18:07:41 GMT]]>

2wheeler wrote:
Screw that, he could've gone sixes with a faster reaction time!

OMFG, LOL!
so i'm not allowed to make a legitimate observation?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/67586https://fargostreet.com/post/67586Fri, 09 Sep 2005 18:07:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 10.94@125mph!! on Fri, 09 Sep 2005 17:55:51 GMT]]>

krzydrftr93 wrote:
hey you got to admit a 6 sex laser would be pretty tight, surely for FWD
what? i think ur dumb now to

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/67582https://fargostreet.com/post/67582Fri, 09 Sep 2005 17:55:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 10.94@125mph!! on Fri, 09 Sep 2005 17:36:36 GMT]]>hey you got to admit a 6 second laser would be pretty tight, surely for FWD

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/67575https://fargostreet.com/post/67575Fri, 09 Sep 2005 17:36:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 10.94@125mph!! on Fri, 09 Sep 2005 17:01:40 GMT]]>

out there wrote:
his fastest run could have been that 10.7x with a faster r/t

Screw that, he could've gone sixes with a faster reaction time!

OMFG, LOL!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/67563https://fargostreet.com/post/67563Fri, 09 Sep 2005 17:01:40 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 10.94@125mph!! on Fri, 09 Sep 2005 16:55:38 GMT]]>

out there wrote:
his fastest run could have been that 10.7x with a faster r/t
Reaction doesn't matter in e/t.

Anyways, that is very, very impressive for a fwd!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/67561https://fargostreet.com/post/67561Fri, 09 Sep 2005 16:55:38 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 10.94@125mph!! on Fri, 09 Sep 2005 16:53:00 GMT]]>his fastest run could have been that 10.7x with a faster r/t

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/67560https://fargostreet.com/post/67560Fri, 09 Sep 2005 16:53:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 10.94@125mph!! on Fri, 09 Sep 2005 14:59:56 GMT]]>Wow, he's hookin' up pretty well at the line for FWD. Nice runs.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/67544https://fargostreet.com/post/67544Fri, 09 Sep 2005 14:59:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 10.94@125mph!! on Fri, 09 Sep 2005 14:50:33 GMT]]>Yep, it's the mid-80's Lazer. Very impressive run, especially without Nawz.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/67543https://fargostreet.com/post/67543Fri, 09 Sep 2005 14:50:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 10.94@125mph!! on Fri, 09 Sep 2005 14:04:48 GMT]]>Isn't he running the old school Chrysler Laser with the Mopar 2.2 or 2.5 in it?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/67538https://fargostreet.com/post/67538Fri, 09 Sep 2005 14:04:48 GMT