<![CDATA[Ferrari 360 Modena dyno]]>Just thought I would share some pics from last weekend- we were in Duluth MN at advanced auto accessories (they had some pretty cool stuff there) Anyway, since many have never actually had a chance to see or much less sit in a 360, I'll tell you it's pretty cool. It is a paddle shifted manual transmission with NO clutch pedal (it's all electronic clutching)
ferrari

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/4029/ferrari-360-modena-dynoRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 09:18:38 GMTTue, 13 Sep 2005 14:31:03 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Ferrari 360 Modena dyno on Wed, 14 Sep 2005 22:44:40 GMT]]>that's crazy.... my srt4 has more torque then a 360 modena.

I'd definitely still rather have the modena.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/68674https://fargostreet.com/post/68674Wed, 14 Sep 2005 22:44:40 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Ferrari 360 Modena dyno on Wed, 14 Sep 2005 22:34:33 GMT]]>I will probably be up in the next 2-3 weeks, I have a few cars to do- I will let you know

A/F was in the 13:0 pretty much straight across (graph uploaded kind of dirty) so it's pretty damn close

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/68673https://fargostreet.com/post/68673Wed, 14 Sep 2005 22:34:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Ferrari 360 Modena dyno on Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:56:20 GMT]]>Ferarri's are always so damn sweet looking, but I might be a little let down buying one and only getting 300 at the wheels. Oh well, it's still cool as shit.

Are you gonna have the dyno in Fargo again anytime soon? I have the 5-speed in and wouldn't mind strapping it down if you are gonna be around.

edit I just looked at the dyno sheet, the a/f is pretty fat for a NA motor. Was that a baseline pull or do you have some way to tune those things?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/68648https://fargostreet.com/post/68648Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:56:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Ferrari 360 Modena dyno on Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:52:35 GMT]]>dyno graph is up on web page

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/68429https://fargostreet.com/post/68429Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:52:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Ferrari 360 Modena dyno on Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:25:01 GMT]]>Actually they weigh in around 3000 lbs according to Automobile magazine.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/68424https://fargostreet.com/post/68424Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:25:01 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Ferrari 360 Modena dyno on Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:21:18 GMT]]>

out there wrote:
interesting that they should be listed at 400+/- bhp yet only dyno at 301. i wonder if perhaps it's the result of the transmission? something like the auto tiburon gt is approx 25% loss
EDIT: just did a look at the page... 8500 is where ferrari lists the peak hp, 301 at 8400 makes me think something is off or they just didn't push it all the way?

think about it every motor is gonna turn out different...100rpm isnt that big of a deal id think...and the dynograph may show it leveling off there so it can make power at 8500 but it just hit it at 8400 instead...i wouldnt complain about hitting my peak power a little bit sooner would you?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/68421https://fargostreet.com/post/68421Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:21:18 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Ferrari 360 Modena dyno on Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:14:54 GMT]]>

dynotune wrote:
I always get a little leary zinging a mo' to that many RPMs- not wanting to see the inside of the motor without proper disassembly. 🙂

Wuss 😛

j/k, I would be a bit leary too.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/68420https://fargostreet.com/post/68420Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:14:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Ferrari 360 Modena dyno on Tue, 13 Sep 2005 20:38:49 GMT]]>that laser is the shit....and as for the ferrari, those things weigh almost nothing don't they?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/68414https://fargostreet.com/post/68414Tue, 13 Sep 2005 20:38:49 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Ferrari 360 Modena dyno on Tue, 13 Sep 2005 20:06:35 GMT]]>Car was rated @ 395 factory, and they are transverse engines. This particular car also has aftermarket wheels (which are heavier to my belief). I don't have any other 360s to compare with, and there have been very few on chassis dynos that I know of, so if you think it should have more to the wheels, it may be. The car was run to 8500-8600, I will post graph later. I watched a guy on hot rod TV run the dyno once, I think I was running it right (and hopefully the 3000+ cars I've dynoed before this...) 😉 The owner of the car also thought about 300 WHP seemed correct from his knowledge as well. I always get a little leary zinging a mo' to that many RPMs- not wanting to see the inside of the motor without proper disassembly. 🙂

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/68404https://fargostreet.com/post/68404Tue, 13 Sep 2005 20:06:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Ferrari 360 Modena dyno on Tue, 13 Sep 2005 19:58:12 GMT]]>damn i'd be a little nervous straping that thing down

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/68393https://fargostreet.com/post/68393Tue, 13 Sep 2005 19:58:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Ferrari 360 Modena dyno on Tue, 13 Sep 2005 19:21:47 GMT]]>interesting that they should be listed at 400+/- bhp yet only dyno at 301. i wonder if perhaps it's the result of the transmission? something like the auto tiburon gt is approx 25% loss
EDIT: just did a look at the page... 8500 is where ferrari lists the peak hp, 301 at 8400 makes me think something is off or they just didn't push it all the way?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/68378https://fargostreet.com/post/68378Tue, 13 Sep 2005 19:21:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Ferrari 360 Modena dyno on Tue, 13 Sep 2005 18:12:53 GMT]]>I thought they had a little more juice than that. Sweet laser though.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/68368https://fargostreet.com/post/68368Tue, 13 Sep 2005 18:12:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Ferrari 360 Modena dyno on Tue, 13 Sep 2005 17:40:50 GMT]]>301 RWHP from about 220 cu inches. not too shabby, especially for a factory car. Id pimp it.

Nice "laser" tho, lol!

McAdam

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/68363https://fargostreet.com/post/68363Tue, 13 Sep 2005 17:40:50 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Ferrari 360 Modena dyno on Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:02:19 GMT]]>Oh sex.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/68350https://fargostreet.com/post/68350Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:02:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Ferrari 360 Modena dyno on Tue, 13 Sep 2005 14:36:43 GMT]]>Hottttt!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/68342https://fargostreet.com/post/68342Tue, 13 Sep 2005 14:36:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Ferrari 360 Modena dyno on Tue, 13 Sep 2005 14:34:45 GMT]]>cool shit

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/68341https://fargostreet.com/post/68341Tue, 13 Sep 2005 14:34:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Ferrari 360 Modena dyno on Tue, 13 Sep 2005 14:33:45 GMT]]>o.m.g.

pimp! only 301whp though... how much do they weight?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/68340https://fargostreet.com/post/68340Tue, 13 Sep 2005 14:33:45 GMT