<![CDATA[Sick of two turbo's?]]>Whats better than two turbo's?.......try three! 😛

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1997-TRIPLE-TURBO-SUPRA-30K-MILES-VERY-RARE-600HP_W0QQitemZ4574779619QQcategoryZ6447QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

How efficient would this be?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/4069/sick-of-two-turbo-sRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 05:56:42 GMTFri, 16 Sep 2005 00:52:22 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Sick of two turbo's? on Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:43:06 GMT]]>3 turbos and still only 600hp....wow. Why not just get one big turbo? And only one made...of course if you make a car a custom there is only one made.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/70215https://fargostreet.com/post/70215Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:43:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Sick of two turbo's? on Mon, 19 Sep 2005 17:43:55 GMT]]>

DJ wrote:
Tri-turbo, 3-rotor (20b) FD

legacy image

I will add that a 20b twin turbo makes 550 HP @ 7500 RPM and 460 Lb-Ft @ 5500 RPM
:eek:

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/69680https://fargostreet.com/post/69680Mon, 19 Sep 2005 17:43:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Sick of two turbo's? on Mon, 19 Sep 2005 17:31:26 GMT]]>Tri-turbo, 3-rotor (20b) FD

legacy image

I will add that a 20b twin turbo makes 550 HP @ 7500 RPM and 460 Lb-Ft @ 5500 RPM

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/69674https://fargostreet.com/post/69674Mon, 19 Sep 2005 17:31:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Sick of two turbo's? on Mon, 19 Sep 2005 06:01:50 GMT]]>

Sweet-WRX-Lovin wrote:
Not without NOS and some flubber I believe 🙂

V

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/69575https://fargostreet.com/post/69575Mon, 19 Sep 2005 06:01:50 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Sick of two turbo's? on Mon, 19 Sep 2005 04:58:27 GMT]]>the seller says it's the only one in existence? right...
wes, is this the one you remember?
http://www.i-m-racing.com/inmottritsup.html

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/69552https://fargostreet.com/post/69552Mon, 19 Sep 2005 04:58:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Sick of two turbo's? on Sun, 18 Sep 2005 15:16:49 GMT]]>Which of course isn't a problem if you have a flux capacitor. Ok, I'm done whoring now...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/69414https://fargostreet.com/post/69414Sun, 18 Sep 2005 15:16:49 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Sick of two turbo's? on Sun, 18 Sep 2005 14:56:38 GMT]]>

ichibankilla wrote:
But could it go plaid?

First it would need to approach Ludicrous Speed.....

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/69406https://fargostreet.com/post/69406Sun, 18 Sep 2005 14:56:38 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Sick of two turbo's? on Sun, 18 Sep 2005 14:34:32 GMT]]>Not without NOS and some flubber I believe 🙂

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/69402https://fargostreet.com/post/69402Sun, 18 Sep 2005 14:34:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Sick of two turbo's? on Sun, 18 Sep 2005 07:13:34 GMT]]>But could it go plaid?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/69394https://fargostreet.com/post/69394Sun, 18 Sep 2005 07:13:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Sick of two turbo's? on Sat, 17 Sep 2005 04:13:54 GMT]]>Yeah, but it still wouldn't be as fast as the 47 sequential turbos setup. I hear it ran the quarter in .0000000001 seconds at ludicrous speed.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/69229https://fargostreet.com/post/69229Sat, 17 Sep 2005 04:13:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Sick of two turbo's? on Sat, 17 Sep 2005 01:37:38 GMT]]>Imagine a car with three turbos under the hood and two remotely located near the mufflers... it would go 2.83 at a bazillion miles an hour. easily.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/69209https://fargostreet.com/post/69209Sat, 17 Sep 2005 01:37:38 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Sick of two turbo's? on Sat, 17 Sep 2005 00:58:01 GMT]]>

ichibankilla wrote:
If this car went 10.87 @126MPH!! with his triple set up, imagine dave with a triple set up in his supra.

More like, think of what that car could do with one big turbo...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/69205https://fargostreet.com/post/69205Sat, 17 Sep 2005 00:58:01 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Sick of two turbo's? on Sat, 17 Sep 2005 00:44:32 GMT]]>Good gravy, there's a metal octopus under the hood!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/69197https://fargostreet.com/post/69197Sat, 17 Sep 2005 00:44:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Sick of two turbo's? on Fri, 16 Sep 2005 23:39:33 GMT]]>If this car went 10.87 @126MPH!! with his triple set up, imagine dave with a triple set up in his supra.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/69184https://fargostreet.com/post/69184Fri, 16 Sep 2005 23:39:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Sick of two turbo's? on Fri, 16 Sep 2005 02:35:56 GMT]]>

Bad93ex wrote:
Kind of like that V8 with 8 turbos huh?

This one http://superchevy.com/features/0504sc_incinertor/

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/69002https://fargostreet.com/post/69002Fri, 16 Sep 2005 02:35:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Sick of two turbo's? on Fri, 16 Sep 2005 02:35:40 GMT]]>That looks like a car in one of my older import mags. Triple turbo and all. I'll dig it up when I get some ambition.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/69001https://fargostreet.com/post/69001Fri, 16 Sep 2005 02:35:40 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Sick of two turbo's? on Fri, 16 Sep 2005 02:29:51 GMT]]>it was FWD too

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/68996https://fargostreet.com/post/68996Fri, 16 Sep 2005 02:29:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Sick of two turbo's? on Fri, 16 Sep 2005 02:21:56 GMT]]>

Jim wrote:
Some guy on a 2G w/ T25 went 11's (with nawz)
Yeah a HUGE shot.

I heard the car was pretty much bone stock too that made that pass.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/68988https://fargostreet.com/post/68988Fri, 16 Sep 2005 02:21:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Sick of two turbo's? on Fri, 16 Sep 2005 02:20:49 GMT]]>did he make any huge horsepower gains by adding a third turbo?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/68986https://fargostreet.com/post/68986Fri, 16 Sep 2005 02:20:49 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Sick of two turbo's? on Fri, 16 Sep 2005 02:14:45 GMT]]>Some guy on a 2G w/ T25 went 11's (with nawz)

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/68985https://fargostreet.com/post/68985Fri, 16 Sep 2005 02:14:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Sick of two turbo's? on Fri, 16 Sep 2005 02:10:35 GMT]]>

Bad93ex wrote:
Umm I thought T-25's sucked?

well you can get A LOT better ones than on the 2G...thats like one of the smallest they make...the one on my car can go 12s pretty easily...not that its big or anything...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/68982https://fargostreet.com/post/68982Fri, 16 Sep 2005 02:10:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Sick of two turbo's? on Fri, 16 Sep 2005 01:56:57 GMT]]>gay

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/68974https://fargostreet.com/post/68974Fri, 16 Sep 2005 01:56:57 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Sick of two turbo's? on Fri, 16 Sep 2005 01:45:10 GMT]]>This was on ebay a while ago too... or maybe it was a different one...

atleast its different/

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/68972https://fargostreet.com/post/68972Fri, 16 Sep 2005 01:45:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Sick of two turbo's? on Fri, 16 Sep 2005 01:26:47 GMT]]>Kind of like that V8 with 8 turbos huh?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/68967https://fargostreet.com/post/68967Fri, 16 Sep 2005 01:26:47 GMT