<![CDATA[Me and Mine]]>Hi my name is Francis (Only Black guy that worked at SLS), i moved from fargo about a year ago, i was in the process of building a twin turbo trans am. well it is done for now but some upgrades are in the making (2-3 Months) i must say for a junkyard kit i love it, and the power i love too. hope you like what you see will get a dyno chart soon. new to this posting thing so if the pics dont work i will try again later.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/4124/me-and-mineRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 09:18:59 GMTTue, 20 Sep 2005 19:53:31 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Me and Mine on Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:45:45 GMT]]>Sweet Car.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/88413https://fargostreet.com/post/88413Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:45:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Me and Mine on Thu, 12 Jan 2006 05:00:26 GMT]]>

weshole wrote:
If that is the case then i apologize. Well, the 9 inch still offers quicker gear changes. I do agree that for those hp levels that the price would be alot closer.
9 inch will weigh about 50 lbs more, and rob more hp on the dyno.

a 35 spline 12 bolt is more than enough for the power he is running.

There is a mamber of CZ28.com running 1100 rwhp through a strange 12 bolt pulling 1.38 60 foots.

I would say thats more than enough axle.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/88170https://fargostreet.com/post/88170Thu, 12 Jan 2006 05:00:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Me and Mine on Thu, 12 Jan 2006 04:50:41 GMT]]>

94NDTA wrote:
Moser and strange have bolt in 9's and 12 bolts. 12's aren't too much more expensive.

He's going to be running 700+ hp. the 8.5 would be too close for comfort IMO.

If that is the case then i apologize. Well, the 9 inch still offers quicker gear changes. I do agree that for those hp levels that the price would be alot closer.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/88167https://fargostreet.com/post/88167Thu, 12 Jan 2006 04:50:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Me and Mine on Thu, 12 Jan 2006 04:43:57 GMT]]>

weshole wrote:
I don't see how any of what I said could be misconstrued as cutting corners. The 12 bolt is a very strong rear gear but it is very expensive when compared to the 9 inch. And seeing as how neither would bolt in the car directly, I thought the 9 inch would be alot more obtainable and parts have been proven time and time again to be cheaper. Not to mention the ease of changing ratios when it suits him. But, I still do think that the 8.5 gear would easily suffice for well over 400+ hp. Just a little advice that's all.
Moser and strange have bolt in 9's and 12 bolts. 12's aren't too much more expensive.

He's going to be running 700+ hp. the 8.5 would be too close for comfort IMO.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/88165https://fargostreet.com/post/88165Thu, 12 Jan 2006 04:43:57 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Me and Mine on Thu, 12 Jan 2006 04:43:47 GMT]]>he already made 580whp...hes going for 700+whp wes...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/88164https://fargostreet.com/post/88164Thu, 12 Jan 2006 04:43:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Me and Mine on Thu, 12 Jan 2006 04:40:15 GMT]]>I don't see how any of what I said could be misconstrued as cutting corners. The 12 bolt is a very strong rear gear but it is very expensive when compared to the 9 inch. And seeing as how neither would bolt in the car directly, I thought the 9 inch would be alot more obtainable and parts have been proven time and time again to be cheaper. Not to mention the ease of changing ratios when it suits him. But, I still do think that the 8.5 gear would easily suffice for well over 400+ hp. Just a little advice that's all.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/88163https://fargostreet.com/post/88163Thu, 12 Jan 2006 04:40:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Me and Mine on Thu, 12 Jan 2006 04:08:47 GMT]]>

weshole wrote:
I think the 8.5" gear would suffice in that baby and may be a little easier to locate. Could be wrong though. You will need to ditch the 7.5" in therefor sure unless you were lucky enough to have yours equipped with the 8.5". But if I was going to do a 12 bolt, wouldn't a 9 inch be easier to fab in there? Not to mention cheaper. I know that the 12 bolts have become rather spendy these days. Unless you happen to have a spare layin around or know of a good deal on one. Looks pretty bad ass. I'd like to hear the sound of a V8TT.
Why cut corners on such a bad ass machine.

Also, as some of the 94-96 impalla SS guys how the 8.5" gear does on their 800 rwhp machines.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/88153https://fargostreet.com/post/88153Thu, 12 Jan 2006 04:08:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Me and Mine on Thu, 12 Jan 2006 03:59:47 GMT]]>

Ngige wrote:
will soon find out as soon as the single plane intake and new clutch go in and somtime this month. but i think its going to be faster than it is, and i am sure i will need to locate a 12Bolt at some point.

I think the 8.5" gear would suffice in that baby and may be a little easier to locate. Could be wrong though. You will need to ditch the 7.5" in therefor sure unless you were lucky enough to have yours equipped with the 8.5". But if I was going to do a 12 bolt, wouldn't a 9 inch be easier to fab in there? Not to mention cheaper. I know that the 12 bolts have become rather spendy these days. Unless you happen to have a spare layin around or know of a good deal on one. Looks pretty bad ass. I'd like to hear the sound of a V8TT.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/88151https://fargostreet.com/post/88151Thu, 12 Jan 2006 03:59:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Me and Mine on Thu, 12 Jan 2006 03:53:22 GMT]]>

YellowEvo wrote:
.

your also gay 😄

"You know how I know you're gay?...." Ahhh that was funny you guys! On another note...nice Trans Am! Props...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/88146https://fargostreet.com/post/88146Thu, 12 Jan 2006 03:53:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Me and Mine on Wed, 11 Jan 2006 19:16:43 GMT]]>will soon find out as soon as the single plane intake and new clutch go in and somtime this month. but i think its going to be faster than it is, and i am sure i will need to locate a 12Bolt at some point.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/88070https://fargostreet.com/post/88070Wed, 11 Jan 2006 19:16:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Me and Mine on Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:14:20 GMT]]>so how fast is that badboy?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/88058https://fargostreet.com/post/88058Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:14:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Me and Mine on Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:27:34 GMT]]>Some new Stuff and an update on the slow but sure progress on my car. Hope you like. 😄

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/88053https://fargostreet.com/post/88053Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:27:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Me and Mine on Tue, 27 Sep 2005 20:16:21 GMT]]>Titties. Now you just need some fat tires to handle the power.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/71459https://fargostreet.com/post/71459Tue, 27 Sep 2005 20:16:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Me and Mine on Tue, 27 Sep 2005 14:54:40 GMT]]>Francis, you are still alive? Car looks pretty sweet! Nice junkyard setup.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/71405https://fargostreet.com/post/71405Tue, 27 Sep 2005 14:54:40 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Me and Mine on Mon, 26 Sep 2005 19:54:09 GMT]]>very nice ride man lookin good!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/71203https://fargostreet.com/post/71203Mon, 26 Sep 2005 19:54:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Me and Mine on Wed, 21 Sep 2005 20:44:34 GMT]]>that looks like the L98 to me...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/70196https://fargostreet.com/post/70196Wed, 21 Sep 2005 20:44:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Me and Mine on Wed, 21 Sep 2005 20:43:33 GMT]]>Nice car! Is that the 305 or 350 TPI?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/70195https://fargostreet.com/post/70195Wed, 21 Sep 2005 20:43:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Me and Mine on Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:48:20 GMT]]>Those cars in Florida stay so damn clean. Very nice looking 3rd gen you have there.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/70142https://fargostreet.com/post/70142Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:48:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Me and Mine on Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:40:08 GMT]]>He is the king of junk yard turbo set up's... Looking good

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/70140https://fargostreet.com/post/70140Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:40:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Me and Mine on Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:56:53 GMT]]>Thats a nice lookin car. I sure hope that you didn't run a fuel line into the car for that fuel pressure gauge.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/70135https://fargostreet.com/post/70135Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:56:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Me and Mine on Wed, 21 Sep 2005 12:22:32 GMT]]>

PSI2HI wrote:
You had made 580whp so far correct?

yes, 580 whp i think that long tube headers and better ic piping and a holley stealth ram intake will put me at the 700hp range. then i know the tranny will take a dump on me. i anyone has a t56 sitting around let me know.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/70126https://fargostreet.com/post/70126Wed, 21 Sep 2005 12:22:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Me and Mine on Wed, 21 Sep 2005 11:34:29 GMT]]>hey man, i met you a couple times. i had a red talon that had some work done there (don't see many of those i bet lol). i wondered where you wondered off too.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/70125https://fargostreet.com/post/70125Wed, 21 Sep 2005 11:34:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Me and Mine on Wed, 21 Sep 2005 05:45:22 GMT]]>i have heard of ur car recently and now just got to see it. nice ride.

check out river city f-bodies if u havent already.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/70113https://fargostreet.com/post/70113Wed, 21 Sep 2005 05:45:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Me and Mine on Wed, 21 Sep 2005 03:38:04 GMT]]>Car is looking good man. It looks like you cleaned up the turbo kit quite a bit now!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/70066https://fargostreet.com/post/70066Wed, 21 Sep 2005 03:38:04 GMT