<![CDATA[Best R/T? How'd everyone do?]]>So here's a lil challenge....

I'll buy ya a beer if you beat my best R/T...
(this of coures only applies to those of age, first come first serve, one time only)
(Applies only to today's races)
(I'm not tellin mine yet.. I'm curious to see what everyone else pulled off)

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/4348/best-r-t-how-d-everyone-doRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 12:16:32 GMTSun, 09 Oct 2005 00:51:38 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Best R/T? How'd everyone do? on Sun, 09 Oct 2005 20:11:54 GMT]]>

dubbsy wrote:
yeah, that's what I was hoping..

although it wouldn't be the first time I"ve seen a 2.x second R/T...

Last year I ran a 5 second reaction time waiting for my RPM's to rise w/ my high stall....but that was intentional, not going for good reaction, just fast speed. Earlier this year I had a 3.2 second reaction (same reason) and still reeled in the Civic I was racing 😄

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/73862https://fargostreet.com/post/73862Sun, 09 Oct 2005 20:11:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Best R/T? How'd everyone do? on Sun, 09 Oct 2005 18:50:55 GMT]]>it was his ET...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/73831https://fargostreet.com/post/73831Sun, 09 Oct 2005 18:50:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Best R/T? How'd everyone do? on Sun, 09 Oct 2005 16:26:41 GMT]]>

weshole wrote:
I think he was confused with 60ft times and R/T.

yeah, that's what I was hoping..

although it wouldn't be the first time I"ve seen a 2.x second R/T...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/73806https://fargostreet.com/post/73806Sun, 09 Oct 2005 16:26:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Best R/T? How'd everyone do? on Sun, 09 Oct 2005 16:21:29 GMT]]>

dubbsy wrote:
did you have a nice nap?

(I sure hope you were waiting for a turbo to spool.....or armageddon.)

I think he was confused with 60ft times and R/T.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/73803https://fargostreet.com/post/73803Sun, 09 Oct 2005 16:21:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Best R/T? How'd everyone do? on Sun, 09 Oct 2005 16:20:27 GMT]]>no no that's what i got in the 1/4 mile....

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/73802https://fargostreet.com/post/73802Sun, 09 Oct 2005 16:20:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Best R/T? How'd everyone do? on Sun, 09 Oct 2005 15:51:09 GMT]]>

PSiedTSi wrote:
kirk had like a .000

well, that's what it'll take. Managed to crack off a .001.. thought for sure I red-lit

deffinetly need to work on consistently cutting 0.050 or better lights

gradually gettin better though... (better than the .333 crap I ran last time out), just needs to get consistent.
0.146 0.091 0.092 0.139 0.056 0.102 0.023 0.073 0.075 0.042 -0.020 0.011 0.111 0.001 0.096 0.102 -0.044

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/73797https://fargostreet.com/post/73797Sun, 09 Oct 2005 15:51:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Best R/T? How'd everyone do? on Sun, 09 Oct 2005 08:11:53 GMT]]>.030

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/73781https://fargostreet.com/post/73781Sun, 09 Oct 2005 08:11:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Best R/T? How'd everyone do? on Sun, 09 Oct 2005 06:53:17 GMT]]>kirk had like a .000

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/73768https://fargostreet.com/post/73768Sun, 09 Oct 2005 06:53:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Best R/T? How'd everyone do? on Sun, 09 Oct 2005 03:40:45 GMT]]>I don't have my slips here since I'm not at home, but I think it was .042.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/73756https://fargostreet.com/post/73756Sun, 09 Oct 2005 03:40:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Best R/T? How'd everyone do? on Sun, 09 Oct 2005 03:15:01 GMT]]>.095 for me

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/73753https://fargostreet.com/post/73753Sun, 09 Oct 2005 03:15:01 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Best R/T? How'd everyone do? on Sun, 09 Oct 2005 00:58:07 GMT]]>

YellowEvo wrote:
I ran a 2.037 in john deere's 1g

did you have a nice nap?

(I sure hope you were waiting for a turbo to spool.....or armageddon.)

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/73733https://fargostreet.com/post/73733Sun, 09 Oct 2005 00:58:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Best R/T? How'd everyone do? on Sun, 09 Oct 2005 00:56:14 GMT]]>I ran a 2.037 in john deere's 1g

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/73730https://fargostreet.com/post/73730Sun, 09 Oct 2005 00:56:14 GMT