<![CDATA[Anyone know the details on that new GTO?]]>GTO showed up later there.. I ran him right after he teched and refused to tell me what he had done to the car...

and dammit, I'm curious...

Sounds mean
ran 13.6 @ 108 with a bunch of spin (I even out 60'd him)
figures 420HP....so he says...

anyone?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/4351/anyone-know-the-details-on-that-new-gtoRSS for NodeTue, 14 Jul 2026 16:56:41 GMTSun, 09 Oct 2005 00:57:13 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Anyone know the details on that new GTO? on Sun, 09 Oct 2005 23:42:11 GMT]]>

dubbsy wrote:
has he run it before? I know he had all kinds of traction issues yesterday, curious what it runs if it hooks.
First time at the track with that car. Blowers been on for 2 weeks.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/73893https://fargostreet.com/post/73893Sun, 09 Oct 2005 23:42:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Anyone know the details on that new GTO? on Sun, 09 Oct 2005 23:31:47 GMT]]>hmp.. sounded mean either way....

(I was thinking they were closer to high 13s-low 14s stock)

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/73889https://fargostreet.com/post/73889Sun, 09 Oct 2005 23:31:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Anyone know the details on that new GTO? on Sun, 09 Oct 2005 22:47:46 GMT]]>if i remember right that about what a stock gto would run if not a bit faster, he could have been, 1 pulling your leg, 2 a really shitty driver, or 3 really bad traction

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/73879https://fargostreet.com/post/73879Sun, 09 Oct 2005 22:47:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Anyone know the details on that new GTO? on Sun, 09 Oct 2005 17:57:31 GMT]]>has he run it before? I know he had all kinds of traction issues yesterday, curious what it runs if it hooks.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/73824https://fargostreet.com/post/73824Sun, 09 Oct 2005 17:57:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Anyone know the details on that new GTO? on Sun, 09 Oct 2005 17:22:32 GMT]]>

Jim wrote:
108mph trap, and 13.6 doesn't equate to 420 hp...

Brian Curry ran 13.5 @ 108-109 with 399WHP yesterday.(Saleen Mustang w/Vortech) Prolly had a few more ponies due to the weather. He had a slight traction issue. 😉

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/73814https://fargostreet.com/post/73814Sun, 09 Oct 2005 17:22:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Anyone know the details on that new GTO? on Sun, 09 Oct 2005 16:57:53 GMT]]>

Jim wrote:
108mph trap, and 13.6 doesn't equate to 420 hp...

well I'm not saying he did or didn't have 420hp.... just what he told me...

but like I say, he did spin a lot

2.350 60'... and to run a mid 13 1/4, I would expect probably atleast a 1.8-1.9 60' for a clean run.

looking at the slip I wouldn't be suprised to see the car well into the 12s if he sticks however much HP he does have.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/73810https://fargostreet.com/post/73810Sun, 09 Oct 2005 16:57:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Anyone know the details on that new GTO? on Sun, 09 Oct 2005 16:27:25 GMT]]>108mph trap, and 13.6 doesn't equate to 420 hp...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/73807https://fargostreet.com/post/73807Sun, 09 Oct 2005 16:27:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Anyone know the details on that new GTO? on Sun, 09 Oct 2005 15:14:57 GMT]]>

97jeep wrote:
black 04 with hood?

yeah.... (well was that an aftermarket hood? I was thinking that looked like the hood they put on some of them now)

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/73794https://fargostreet.com/post/73794Sun, 09 Oct 2005 15:14:57 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Anyone know the details on that new GTO? on Sun, 09 Oct 2005 02:23:05 GMT]]>black 04 with hood?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/73739https://fargostreet.com/post/73739Sun, 09 Oct 2005 02:23:05 GMT