<![CDATA[Cool wheelstand]]>Especially considering this is with BFG drag radials. It was a 1.29 60'

legacy image

legacy image

legacy image

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/4387/cool-wheelstandRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 15:20:01 GMTTue, 11 Oct 2005 15:00:34 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Cool wheelstand on Sat, 15 Oct 2005 02:13:23 GMT]]>i want to experience that at least once. nothing but sky at the launch. 😄

well Dave if i am around and you are running i will be sure to have camera at the ready. if you could see all the pics i have taken you would see alot of your Supra. something about it and i am not even an import kinda guy, but i am a racing kinda guy. so as long as it races i am good and interested.

Monty

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/75044https://fargostreet.com/post/75044Sat, 15 Oct 2005 02:13:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Cool wheelstand on Thu, 13 Oct 2005 15:35:32 GMT]]>That's got to be a little bit of a creepy feeling not being able to see all or any of the track on launch like that. If you can feel anything besides your internal organs wrapping around your spine I guess. 🙂

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/74700https://fargostreet.com/post/74700Thu, 13 Oct 2005 15:35:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Cool wheelstand on Thu, 13 Oct 2005 12:46:59 GMT]]>

sitn2lo wrote:
that was some cool shit...lots of power!!!

There is a guy that has a video of the pass, I'm waiting for that to me let out and I'll post it here. I guess the front end got higher than it was in the pics....

:eek:

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/74684https://fargostreet.com/post/74684Thu, 13 Oct 2005 12:46:59 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Cool wheelstand on Thu, 13 Oct 2005 12:05:02 GMT]]>

DaveH wrote:
One jab back at Ethan, a couple of full weight street car Supra's with stock manual transmission (and stock wheelbase 😉 ) ran upper 8's... 8.97 if I recall at a similar 160+ MPH. 😛
What, the quick Supras dont add weight? Cause the LOW 7 second bikes are around 50-100 pounds overweight. Did I mention they are street bikes? With DOTs. With manual transmissions. And can run on pump gas. 😉

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/74679https://fargostreet.com/post/74679Thu, 13 Oct 2005 12:05:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Cool wheelstand on Thu, 13 Oct 2005 07:19:50 GMT]]>that was some cool shit...lots of power!!!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/74676https://fargostreet.com/post/74676Thu, 13 Oct 2005 07:19:50 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Cool wheelstand on Thu, 13 Oct 2005 06:31:33 GMT]]>that pic is cool...cant wait to see the blur

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/74672https://fargostreet.com/post/74672Thu, 13 Oct 2005 06:31:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Cool wheelstand on Thu, 13 Oct 2005 04:44:57 GMT]]>I sure hope you get some pics like that nex year too Monty. 🙂

One jab back at Ethan, a couple of full weight street car Supra's with stock manual transmission (and stock wheelbase 😉 ) ran upper 8's... 8.97 if I recall at a similar 160+ MPH. 😛

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/74653https://fargostreet.com/post/74653Thu, 13 Oct 2005 04:44:57 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Cool wheelstand on Thu, 13 Oct 2005 02:00:27 GMT]]>now stop it boys.
;o)

i sure hope i can get some pics like that from idragways.
hint hint

Monty

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/74608https://fargostreet.com/post/74608Thu, 13 Oct 2005 02:00:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Cool wheelstand on Wed, 12 Oct 2005 19:57:46 GMT]]>Nope, 68"(10" over) wheelbase with DOTs.

Is the 1.29/8.19/166 with a stock tranny(manual of course, like the bikes)?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/74533https://fargostreet.com/post/74533Wed, 12 Oct 2005 19:57:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Cool wheelstand on Wed, 12 Oct 2005 19:48:56 GMT]]>

2wheeler wrote:
1.29 60 ft....that's right up there with the bikes 🙂

ET and MPH are about a second slow and 30 MPH down though 😉

Is that stock wheelbase bikes on DOT's?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/74532https://fargostreet.com/post/74532Wed, 12 Oct 2005 19:48:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Cool wheelstand on Wed, 12 Oct 2005 19:16:48 GMT]]>

DaveH wrote:
8.19 166mph

By looking at the pics, it appears that the 60' light was probably triggered by the rear wheels...
1.29 60 ft....that's right up there with the bikes 🙂

ET and MPH are about a second slow and 30 MPH down though 😉

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/74530https://fargostreet.com/post/74530Wed, 12 Oct 2005 19:16:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Cool wheelstand on Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:50:50 GMT]]>

RE-Enema wrote:
Is that with the IRS? or solid rear axle?

Still the stock IRS. I know they have broken a few axles, but the rest of the suspension components seem to be holding up pretty good.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/74476https://fargostreet.com/post/74476Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:50:50 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Cool wheelstand on Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:52:45 GMT]]>Is that with the IRS? or solid rear axle?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/74468https://fargostreet.com/post/74468Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:52:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Cool wheelstand on Tue, 11 Oct 2005 21:28:41 GMT]]>

dubbsy wrote:
that's scootin!

looks like he was a long way out there before he got the wheels all the way up too.

I would agree...the car looks like it scoots!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/74320https://fargostreet.com/post/74320Tue, 11 Oct 2005 21:28:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Cool wheelstand on Tue, 11 Oct 2005 19:59:05 GMT]]>

DaveH wrote:
8.19 166mph

By looking at the pics, it appears that the 60' light was probably triggered by the rear wheels...

that's scootin!

looks like he was a long way out there before he got the wheels all the way up too.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/74298https://fargostreet.com/post/74298Tue, 11 Oct 2005 19:59:05 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Cool wheelstand on Tue, 11 Oct 2005 19:54:55 GMT]]>

spoolude wrote:
hehe does the probe run?

Thats what I was wondering! 😛 There is a lot of smack talk coming from the peanut gallery (or should I say from the Black Mongrel).

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/74296https://fargostreet.com/post/74296Tue, 11 Oct 2005 19:54:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Cool wheelstand on Tue, 11 Oct 2005 19:53:42 GMT]]>

torbs wrote:
what was the 1/4 time on it?

8.19 166mph

By looking at the pics, it appears that the 60' light was probably triggered by the rear wheels...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/74295https://fargostreet.com/post/74295Tue, 11 Oct 2005 19:53:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Cool wheelstand on Tue, 11 Oct 2005 18:24:26 GMT]]>

fallguy wrote:
I'll be doing that in the spring....or if you meant The Black Blurr....then prolly never.

(wink)
hehe does the probe run?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/74280https://fargostreet.com/post/74280Tue, 11 Oct 2005 18:24:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Cool wheelstand on Tue, 11 Oct 2005 18:24:11 GMT]]>what was the 1/4 time on it?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/74279https://fargostreet.com/post/74279Tue, 11 Oct 2005 18:24:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Cool wheelstand on Tue, 11 Oct 2005 17:22:12 GMT]]>

spoolude wrote:
whens the black one going to do that?

I'll be doing that in the spring....or if you meant The Black Blurr....then prolly never.

(wink)

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/74274https://fargostreet.com/post/74274Tue, 11 Oct 2005 17:22:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Cool wheelstand on Tue, 11 Oct 2005 16:57:55 GMT]]>whens the black one going to do that?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/74271https://fargostreet.com/post/74271Tue, 11 Oct 2005 16:57:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Cool wheelstand on Tue, 11 Oct 2005 15:04:55 GMT]]>Thats some powa :eek:

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/74255https://fargostreet.com/post/74255Tue, 11 Oct 2005 15:04:55 GMT