<![CDATA[Camaro Might be back in 08]]>http://www.modernracer.com/spyshots/spyshots.html

even if it comes back personally i'd say the mustange won the pony car war by not dieing... the only one of the big 3 automakers that never stoped making a pony car

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/4536/camaro-might-be-back-in-08RSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 10:19:06 GMTFri, 21 Oct 2005 19:11:35 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Camaro Might be back in 08 on Mon, 24 Oct 2005 01:04:59 GMT]]>if the camaro ever comes back.... i will be buying one. And GM will never dissapear, too big of a company to just go "poof" and there gone, the government will most deffinatly be stepping in.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/76527https://fargostreet.com/post/76527Mon, 24 Oct 2005 01:04:59 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camaro Might be back in 08 on Sun, 23 Oct 2005 21:44:38 GMT]]>

wannabe wrote:
Why are they going out of business?
There is NO WAY GM will go out of business.

The government will step in before it does.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/76503https://fargostreet.com/post/76503Sun, 23 Oct 2005 21:44:38 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camaro Might be back in 08 on Sun, 23 Oct 2005 21:40:00 GMT]]>well see if they go out of business.
and it wouldnt be toyota puttin out of business anyways :rolleyes:

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/76501https://fargostreet.com/post/76501Sun, 23 Oct 2005 21:40:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camaro Might be back in 08 on Sun, 23 Oct 2005 21:36:56 GMT]]>

camzaro28 wrote:
hmmm, if u actually think toyota sells more cars then GM, ur a friggen moron.

and if they do bring it back, i think it should be in 09 so they can sell it as anni edition. that should be the most marketable way.
Why are they going out of business?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/76499https://fargostreet.com/post/76499Sun, 23 Oct 2005 21:36:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camaro Might be back in 08 on Sun, 23 Oct 2005 21:34:28 GMT]]>hmmm, if u actually think toyota sells more cars then GM, ur a friggen moron.

and if they do bring it back, i think it should be in 09 so they can sell it as anni edition. that should be the most marketable way.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/76498https://fargostreet.com/post/76498Sun, 23 Oct 2005 21:34:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camaro Might be back in 08 on Sun, 23 Oct 2005 19:39:23 GMT]]>I like the look of that picture. Thing would be awesome and you all know it.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/76480https://fargostreet.com/post/76480Sun, 23 Oct 2005 19:39:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camaro Might be back in 08 on Sun, 23 Oct 2005 19:27:21 GMT]]>we can all agree that they wont sell as many cars as toyota!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/76478https://fargostreet.com/post/76478Sun, 23 Oct 2005 19:27:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camaro Might be back in 08 on Sun, 23 Oct 2005 16:21:30 GMT]]>

CCr wrote:
that was kind of a whoring coment. Camaro's are what this thread is about. However whenever camaro's are mention mullet's and also mustangs are mentioned. I think it could go for a few years based on nostalgia, but the camaro will again eventually die. Again.
You and your smelly face will die.

Long live the camaro.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/76460https://fargostreet.com/post/76460Sun, 23 Oct 2005 16:21:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camaro Might be back in 08 on Sun, 23 Oct 2005 16:06:33 GMT]]>The camaro will come back and the mustang will die. 😄

J/K that would never happen but we can always hope.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/76457https://fargostreet.com/post/76457Sun, 23 Oct 2005 16:06:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camaro Might be back in 08 on Sun, 23 Oct 2005 07:18:31 GMT]]>that was kind of a whoring coment. Camaro's are what this thread is about. However whenever camaro's are mention mullet's and also mustangs are mentioned. I think it could go for a few years based on nostalgia, but the camaro will again eventually die. Again.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/76442https://fargostreet.com/post/76442Sun, 23 Oct 2005 07:18:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camaro Might be back in 08 on Sun, 23 Oct 2005 07:10:11 GMT]]>soltice=gay...and we're not talking about that car in the first place.... :rolleyes:

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/76439https://fargostreet.com/post/76439Sun, 23 Oct 2005 07:10:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camaro Might be back in 08 on Sun, 23 Oct 2005 03:31:04 GMT]]>saturn sky's are pimp. this thing is pretty ugly. What about the solstice? whos gonna buy one next year?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/76422https://fargostreet.com/post/76422Sun, 23 Oct 2005 03:31:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camaro Might be back in 08 on Sun, 23 Oct 2005 02:33:59 GMT]]>That picture was done by a person not affiliated with GM. We have no idea what it will look like.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/76418https://fargostreet.com/post/76418Sun, 23 Oct 2005 02:33:59 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camaro Might be back in 08 on Sat, 22 Oct 2005 20:37:49 GMT]]>I like the look of it....

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/76385https://fargostreet.com/post/76385Sat, 22 Oct 2005 20:37:49 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camaro Might be back in 08 on Sat, 22 Oct 2005 20:27:29 GMT]]>shit now that you say it i do remeber seeing photos like that a while back....

might be how freaking ugly the last generation cam. was.... that could have played a big part in cam. low sales... 69 was a very sharp car after that the Pont. TA had it all over the cam. on styling and that car was never pushed by GM

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/76383https://fargostreet.com/post/76383Sat, 22 Oct 2005 20:27:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camaro Might be back in 08 on Sat, 22 Oct 2005 07:11:21 GMT]]>Speaking about concepts i remember the saturn Sky back in 2001 had a premire and now in 2006 they're finally gonna make it. I thought that was pretty interesting tho i don't think many people here are into saturns....or care

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/76338https://fargostreet.com/post/76338Sat, 22 Oct 2005 07:11:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camaro Might be back in 08 on Sat, 22 Oct 2005 05:55:02 GMT]]>mustangs won on sales all but one year. one year only. It was partly marketing. It was also slightly more affordable to get into them. camaro's were USUALLY a tish more. Hell we all should know that the camaro was created specifically to compete with mustangs. A carmaker has to do that when you sell over a million cars of one type of model in 2 years. Camaro's did for the most part out perform them(top model v. top model).

side note: A lot of people talk about the failure of the mustang II also, but the fourth best selling year was the 1974 mustangII.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/76333https://fargostreet.com/post/76333Sat, 22 Oct 2005 05:55:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camaro Might be back in 08 on Fri, 21 Oct 2005 20:38:47 GMT]]>I dont like the look of it...

Looks like a corvette back end and mustang front end

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/76267https://fargostreet.com/post/76267Fri, 21 Oct 2005 20:38:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camaro Might be back in 08 on Fri, 21 Oct 2005 20:37:14 GMT]]>If it did somehow come out like that it would be pretty cool. Reminds me of the 67-69 camaros which are my favorite.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/76266https://fargostreet.com/post/76266Fri, 21 Oct 2005 20:37:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camaro Might be back in 08 on Fri, 21 Oct 2005 19:56:25 GMT]]>yeeeah, that's quite possibly the oldest 'camaro concept' on the internet... was probably out before they even quit producing them even...

and it's been shot down over and over.
(cause when the hell did a 3D rendering become a spy shot?)

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/76262https://fargostreet.com/post/76262Fri, 21 Oct 2005 19:56:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camaro Might be back in 08 on Fri, 21 Oct 2005 19:47:24 GMT]]>We've known this for about 3 years. The only reason the mustang is still being produced and the camaro isn't is because Ford actually knows how to market vehicles. The 4th gen camaros (93-02) out performed the mustang in every aspect(except the 98 or 99 and up cobras), GM just did a horrible job in marketing the camaro.

There is also supposed to be a camaro concept car at the Detroit auto show in January.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/76261https://fargostreet.com/post/76261Fri, 21 Oct 2005 19:47:24 GMT