<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[01 Sierra 3&#x2F;4 ton quad cab vs. 05 Ridgeline]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">what do you guys think are the pros and cons of these items...my dad is in a debate on which to get...im thinking honda because its basically new, only like 3-4k more, has a warranty, and gets better milage. i dont know though...which do you guys think would be better?</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/topic/4616/01-sierra-3-4-ton-quad-cab-vs.-05-ridgeline</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 01:08:18 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://fargostreet.com/topic/4616.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 01:19:14 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 01 Sierra 3&#x2F;4 ton quad cab vs. 05 Ridgeline on Fri, 28 Oct 2005 21:14:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">i would take teh tundra over both, but i am almost certain it would be more expensive</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/77580</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/77580</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[camzaro28]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 21:14:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 01 Sierra 3&#x2F;4 ton quad cab vs. 05 Ridgeline on Fri, 28 Oct 2005 05:23:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Ridgeline: Pro...V-TAK!!<br />
Con...Probly sucks balls</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/77504</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/77504</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[DelSlow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 05:23:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 01 Sierra 3&#x2F;4 ton quad cab vs. 05 Ridgeline on Fri, 28 Oct 2005 05:07:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">treimche wrote:<br />
There really is no comparison between a 3/4 ton Chevy and the Honda pickup.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">but the honda has V-TEC yo!!!! <img src="https://fargostreet.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f604.png?v=40430adaedb" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--smile" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":D" alt="😄" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/77499</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/77499</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[torbs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 05:07:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 01 Sierra 3&#x2F;4 ton quad cab vs. 05 Ridgeline on Fri, 28 Oct 2005 05:02:18 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">There really is no comparison between a 3/4 ton Chevy and the Honda pickup.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/77496</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/77496</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[treimche]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 05:02:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 01 Sierra 3&#x2F;4 ton quad cab vs. 05 Ridgeline on Fri, 28 Oct 2005 04:35:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">the V8 tundra isnt that bad...itd be better for hardcore duties than the ridgeline which is just a suburban use truck...nick has a tundra</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/77467</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/77467</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[PSiedTSi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 04:35:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 01 Sierra 3&#x2F;4 ton quad cab vs. 05 Ridgeline on Fri, 28 Oct 2005 04:28:57 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">if snow removal poss. deffinatly not the honda. just look it up as far as motor info and i think that 6.0 is like 370ish</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/77461</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/77461</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[KA-T_240]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 04:28:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 01 Sierra 3&#x2F;4 ton quad cab vs. 05 Ridgeline on Fri, 28 Oct 2005 04:28:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">also, another vehicle that'd be considerd is a quad cab V8 tundra...any info on that thing too??</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/77460</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/77460</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[torbs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 04:28:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 01 Sierra 3&#x2F;4 ton quad cab vs. 05 Ridgeline on Fri, 28 Oct 2005 04:27:37 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">like i said...its very iffy if he'll be doing that or not...his schedule is kinda hectic with both him and my step mom working day/night shifts...plus my lil bro on top of it...</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/77458</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/77458</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[torbs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 04:27:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 01 Sierra 3&#x2F;4 ton quad cab vs. 05 Ridgeline on Fri, 28 Oct 2005 04:25:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">well if he does snow removal definately not the ridgeline...</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/77456</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/77456</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[PSiedTSi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 04:25:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 01 Sierra 3&#x2F;4 ton quad cab vs. 05 Ridgeline on Fri, 28 Oct 2005 04:23:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">my dad will be using it for an occassional boat tower and a potential snow removal (that one is iffy)...the GMC has a 6.0l in it..so like a 383ish???...otherwise, it'll be the general DD truck that has a baby seat in the back (i got a 1.5yr old half brother)...</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/77454</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/77454</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[torbs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 04:23:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 01 Sierra 3&#x2F;4 ton quad cab vs. 05 Ridgeline on Fri, 28 Oct 2005 04:20:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">thats exactly what i said ^^^^</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/77453</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/77453</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[PSiedTSi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 04:20:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 01 Sierra 3&#x2F;4 ton quad cab vs. 05 Ridgeline on Fri, 28 Oct 2005 04:18:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">in no way shape or form will a ridge line ever hold up to the chevey 3/4 truck for being used as a truck, but if its just being bought to have a truck then buy what you think looks better.  and you don't really need a 3/4 if you are just going to be doing little odd jobs around the house and what not. personally if i'd buy anything over a 1/2 ton pickup i'd get a diesel.  but look at the to and look at what it well be used for and how practical one is over the other</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/77451</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/77451</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[KA-T_240]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 04:18:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 01 Sierra 3&#x2F;4 ton quad cab vs. 05 Ridgeline on Fri, 28 Oct 2005 02:02:57 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">a unibody pickup just doesn't sit with me for some reason.</p>
<p dir="auto">one of the car magazines (I think it was C&amp;D) had nothing but bad to say about the ridgeline except that it rode nice - and for that reason it won the challenge it was in :roll:)</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/77402</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/77402</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[dubbsy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 02:02:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 01 Sierra 3&#x2F;4 ton quad cab vs. 05 Ridgeline on Fri, 28 Oct 2005 01:38:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">you...own...a domestic...if you said you liked the honda at all it'd be like going against your domestic religion or somthing <img src="https://fargostreet.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f61b.png?v=40430adaedb" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--stuck_out_tongue" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":p" alt="😛" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/77391</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/77391</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[torbs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 01:38:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 01 Sierra 3&#x2F;4 ton quad cab vs. 05 Ridgeline on Fri, 28 Oct 2005 01:26:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">no debate here. take the chevy over the honda anyday.</p>
<p dir="auto">seriously i dont like the new ridgelines.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/77385</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/77385</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[camzaro28]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 01:26:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 01 Sierra 3&#x2F;4 ton quad cab vs. 05 Ridgeline on Fri, 28 Oct 2005 01:20:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">wait isnt it a honda ridgeline? a highlander is a toyota SUV</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/77381</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/77381</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[PSiedTSi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 01:20:11 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>