<![CDATA[I think I might sell the TA.]]>If this comes out as good as the concept.
http://www.evyl.org/stuff/camaroconcept8oo.jpg

http://www.evyl.org/stuff/camaro_4.jpg

I'll change them to links.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/5369/i-think-i-might-sell-the-ta.RSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 08:47:04 GMTFri, 13 Jan 2006 01:32:04 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to I think I might sell the TA. on Wed, 18 Jan 2006 06:13:35 GMT]]>

97jeep wrote:
if i remember right they were not origanally basing the gto on monaro or else what i had scene was a extremely early concept, that was 4-5 years ago

The GTO is essentially a rebadged Monaro; it is manufactured in Australia. I personally could deal with the plain appearance to get the LS2, but that's just me.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/88892https://fargostreet.com/post/88892Wed, 18 Jan 2006 06:13:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I think I might sell the TA. on Wed, 18 Jan 2006 04:45:29 GMT]]>

Ngige wrote:
what about the TA with a probable 6.6L

That TA chop is horrible. It mixes first gen camaro lines in the rear with a 2nd gen 77-78 TA in the front, and a 77 bird.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/88876https://fargostreet.com/post/88876Wed, 18 Jan 2006 04:45:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I think I might sell the TA. on Wed, 18 Jan 2006 04:34:28 GMT]]>if i remember right they were not origanally basing the gto on monaro or else what i had scene was a extremely early concept, that was 4-5 years ago

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/88875https://fargostreet.com/post/88875Wed, 18 Jan 2006 04:34:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I think I might sell the TA. on Wed, 18 Jan 2006 04:29:05 GMT]]>There is no Trans Am concept, there will be no fiebird/Trans Am if the camaro makes it to production. That picture is a photshop.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/88871https://fargostreet.com/post/88871Wed, 18 Jan 2006 04:29:05 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I think I might sell the TA. on Wed, 18 Jan 2006 03:45:46 GMT]]>i dont think the GTO looks different from the concept does it? i thought it always looked like monero...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/88860https://fargostreet.com/post/88860Wed, 18 Jan 2006 03:45:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I think I might sell the TA. on Wed, 18 Jan 2006 03:26:06 GMT]]>all of the new retro-rods in my opinion are not that bad but you never know until you see the final version like what happend to the GTO it was butchered from the concept

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/88855https://fargostreet.com/post/88855Wed, 18 Jan 2006 03:26:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I think I might sell the TA. on Wed, 18 Jan 2006 03:21:55 GMT]]>I dont think it will look like the concept car. I also dont think the concept is all that great looking which is why I cant imagine the production version will be any better. There is just something about the front end of a new pontiac that makes me want to vomit. The honeycomb crap should have been forgotten at the turn of the century too.

tsi tom I think the gto is just as ugly

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/88852https://fargostreet.com/post/88852Wed, 18 Jan 2006 03:21:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I think I might sell the TA. on Wed, 18 Jan 2006 03:15:49 GMT]]>

91nbtsi wrote:
....For me, I'd take one if I had a spare 30k sitting around...(If they were in production..)

Who here thinks it will look like the concept car? Just a fair, honest question...

I believe GM will find a way to phuck it up, tone it down, or take away an redeeming qualities the concept might have....

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/88850https://fargostreet.com/post/88850Wed, 18 Jan 2006 03:15:49 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I think I might sell the TA. on Wed, 18 Jan 2006 03:06:33 GMT]]>Don't worry people, I am sure they just put that gay ass sticker on there for all the mullet wearing 80's TA loving wife beater supporting folk. I like both the TA and Camaro concepts and I am pretty sure most of you would think they are pretty damn cool if you saw them driving down the road. For me, I'd take one if I had a spare 30k sitting around...(If they were in production..)

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/88849https://fargostreet.com/post/88849Wed, 18 Jan 2006 03:06:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I think I might sell the TA. on Wed, 18 Jan 2006 03:00:07 GMT]]>

92BlackTT wrote:
pontiac has done a terrible job bringing back cars and the ta is no different. if they wanted to save money they should have just put the big sticker on the hood of a bonneville and called er a day.

Am I the only one who thinks Pontiac completely slaughtered the GTO?....

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/88847https://fargostreet.com/post/88847Wed, 18 Jan 2006 03:00:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I think I might sell the TA. on Wed, 18 Jan 2006 02:53:31 GMT]]>pontiac has done a terrible job bringing back cars and the ta is no different. if they wanted to save money they should have just put the big sticker on the hood of a bonneville and called er a day.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/88845https://fargostreet.com/post/88845Wed, 18 Jan 2006 02:53:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I think I might sell the TA. on Wed, 18 Jan 2006 02:03:15 GMT]]>

btleier wrote:
that TA concept is kinda hideous........ maybe it's just the huge decal on the hood......

Im KINDA leaning the same way about the decal...but regardless I would pick one of those TA's up in a heartbeat..... 😉

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/88832https://fargostreet.com/post/88832Wed, 18 Jan 2006 02:03:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I think I might sell the TA. on Tue, 17 Jan 2006 15:13:47 GMT]]>that TA concept is kinda hideous........ maybe it's just the huge decal on the hood......

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/88730https://fargostreet.com/post/88730Tue, 17 Jan 2006 15:13:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I think I might sell the TA. on Tue, 17 Jan 2006 13:34:17 GMT]]>what about the TA with a probable 6.6L

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/88724https://fargostreet.com/post/88724Tue, 17 Jan 2006 13:34:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I think I might sell the TA. on Tue, 17 Jan 2006 07:45:43 GMT]]>the rear end on that thing reminds me alot of the concept challenger. Also, Chrysler started all this retro bullshit with the Charger and the 300C. The Charger and the Magnum are the pre-quills to all this new shit. IMHO, the Camaro is gonna look alot like the Challenger and everything else thats gonna be coming out. Its all gonna start looking like the same shit. I mean, its already hard enough to tell the difference between a Charger and a 300C. WTF. I work on those cars everyday, and the internal wiring, dashes, and all that shit is ALL the same for the Chryslers. I just hope that one of the Companies springs out and just comes out with something totally off the wall. The Camaro does look cool though, and I'm a camaro fan. So if I had to pic between this and the Challenger.......so far.........I'd pick the Camaro.

Also.......end of rant. Continue..............

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/88721https://fargostreet.com/post/88721Tue, 17 Jan 2006 07:45:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I think I might sell the TA. on Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:28:52 GMT]]>reminds me of the new mustangs

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/88635https://fargostreet.com/post/88635Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:28:52 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I think I might sell the TA. on Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:31:28 GMT]]>

PSiedTSi wrote:
BUT the challenger was never a light car to start out with...Chrysler is putting all the luxury stuff in it so of course its gonna be heavy...usually i'd say i would pick GM over Chrysler but Chrysler has just been doing some awesome stuff(Challenger, Imperial, etc) lately...GM just seems like its behind the curve a tad...the Solstice GXP(finally a turbo ECOTEC) might be a step in the right direction however...I just think the Camaro might be too late of a release...

EDIT: and im just not a big fan of the Camaro's grill either

Solstice do people actually like the look of that front end????? I think I'd rather have a pinto

It's ok looking but you have to admit right now Ford is the king of the new/old design with the mustang... I also think the challenger is much better and agree GM is behind the times much like most of the time... and just to show i'm not a GM hater like most of you take a crtism towards one company you have to give them props on the tahoo it finaly out sold the explorer 1st time since 84 or 86 can't remeber which of the 2 years for sure

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/88496https://fargostreet.com/post/88496Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:31:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I think I might sell the TA. on Sat, 14 Jan 2006 20:10:12 GMT]]>

Dangler wrote:
God forbid GM comes out with a cutting edge, fresh design. The retro $hit is starting to get played out - and I'd be willing to bet the Camaro concept, after the first year, will tank and won't come close to their sales goals.

As far as cars are concerned, GM sucks ass IMHO. The C6 is the only car that is worth anything.

</end rant>
lol, that was funny.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/88486https://fargostreet.com/post/88486Sat, 14 Jan 2006 20:10:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I think I might sell the TA. on Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:26:04 GMT]]>God forbid GM comes out with a cutting edge, fresh design. The retro $hit is starting to get played out - and I'd be willing to bet the Camaro concept, after the first year, will tank and won't come close to their sales goals.

As far as cars are concerned, GM sucks ass IMHO. The C6 is the only car that is worth anything.

</end rant>

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/88483https://fargostreet.com/post/88483Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:26:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I think I might sell the TA. on Sat, 14 Jan 2006 04:08:35 GMT]]>BUT the challenger was never a light car to start out with...Chrysler is putting all the luxury stuff in it so of course its gonna be heavy...usually i'd say i would pick GM over Chrysler but Chrysler has just been doing some awesome stuff(Challenger, Imperial, etc) lately...GM just seems like its behind the curve a tad...the Solstice GXP(finally a turbo ECOTEC) might be a step in the right direction however...I just think the Camaro might be too late of a release...

EDIT: and im just not a big fan of the Camaro's grill either

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/88449https://fargostreet.com/post/88449Sat, 14 Jan 2006 04:08:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I think I might sell the TA. on Sat, 14 Jan 2006 04:04:54 GMT]]>

PSiedTSi wrote:
the camaro is alright but i think its gonna come out too late AND the challenger is just a lot nicer...
I disagree completely. I think the new challanger looks way too bland, AND it is going to be heavy as hell (almost 4200 lbs).

Camaro FTW.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/88448https://fargostreet.com/post/88448Sat, 14 Jan 2006 04:04:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I think I might sell the TA. on Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:54:58 GMT]]>

lrl1990 wrote:
They work for me!!!

Aight, I copy and pasted the addresses into a new window and it worked.

I want one!!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/88419https://fargostreet.com/post/88419Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:54:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I think I might sell the TA. on Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:43:23 GMT]]>

91nbtsi wrote:
Links don't work.

They work for me!!!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/88410https://fargostreet.com/post/88410Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:43:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I think I might sell the TA. on Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:41:45 GMT]]>Links don't work.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/88409https://fargostreet.com/post/88409Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:41:45 GMT