<![CDATA[nsx engine?]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/540/nsx-engineRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 13:23:40 GMTTue, 05 Oct 2004 01:15:41 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to nsx engine? on Fri, 29 Oct 2004 16:13:45 GMT]]>its a type s

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/10811https://fargostreet.com/post/10811Fri, 29 Oct 2004 16:13:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to nsx engine? on Thu, 28 Oct 2004 20:57:48 GMT]]>

theoblivious wrote:
ya dude my dad has an rsx im itching to see how fast it is. Apparently my complete exhaust kit non turbo with a test pipe gets beaten off the line but then it keeps up with the rsx for acceleration. though undoubtly the rsx has more potential than the gsr. yeah id be up to race though its a really touchy clutch for starts, ill most likely burn the wheels first few times.

kenn

I think "more potential" depends on the amount of money you have to burn..id rather drive a boosted gsr then a stock rsx.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/10741https://fargostreet.com/post/10741Thu, 28 Oct 2004 20:57:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to nsx engine? on Thu, 28 Oct 2004 16:28:29 GMT]]>ya dude my dad has an rsx im itching to see how fast it is. Apparently my complete exhaust kit non turbo with a test pipe gets beaten off the line but then it keeps up with the rsx for acceleration. though undoubtly the rsx has more potential than the gsr. yeah id be up to race though its a really touchy clutch for starts, ill most likely burn the wheels first few times.

kenn

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/10693https://fargostreet.com/post/10693Thu, 28 Oct 2004 16:28:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to nsx engine? on Thu, 28 Oct 2004 07:05:29 GMT]]>

spoolude wrote:
wut kind of numbers dose a non vtec rsx make?

Innovation propels the RSX in a few ways, starting with its engine. Its "intelligent" Variable Valve Timing and Lift Electronic Control (i-VTEC®) is even more impressive than its first incarnation, the powerful VTEC® engine.

In the RSX, i-VTEC helps the responsive 2.0-liter, DOHC engine put out 160-horsepower, while in the RSX Type-S, the engine is pushed to a robust 210-horsepower. Remarkably powerful? Yes. And uncommonly fuel efficient, affording both engines with Low-Emission-Vehicle (LEV-2) ratings and an 110,000-mile service sticker
NOt track numbers but it should help 😄 http://www.acura.com/models/model_perf_engine.asp?module=rsx RSX
Type-S
Engine Type
Aluminum Alloy 16-Valve, DOHC, i-VTECTM Inline 4-cylinder
Displacement (liters)
2.0
Horsepower (SAE net)
160 bhp @ 6500 rpm
210 bhp @ 7800 rpm
Torque
141 lbs-ft @ 4000 rpm
143 lbs-ft @ 7000 rpm
Redline
6800 rpm
8100 rpm
Compression Ratio
9.8:1
11.0:1
Fuel Injection
PGM-FI Multi-Point Injection
Emissions
LEV-II CARB

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/10619https://fargostreet.com/post/10619Thu, 28 Oct 2004 07:05:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to nsx engine? on Thu, 28 Oct 2004 05:25:16 GMT]]>wut kind of numbers dose a non vtec rsx make?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/10595https://fargostreet.com/post/10595Thu, 28 Oct 2004 05:25:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to nsx engine? on Thu, 28 Oct 2004 05:15:55 GMT]]>

spoolude wrote:
right on the worst trannys ever but not on 15sec car i have heard of guys running mid 14s on just a h22 and some minor mods

ps.. if u have a RSX lets race

I hear a lot of shit, but until I see it I won't believe it. Obviously you have a prelude, and I'm definitely not knocking it...its not a bad car, but the point is that stock for stock an rsx is better in pretty much every category than the prelude. Now if they only made them in 4ws ( :rolleyes: ) !

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/10593https://fargostreet.com/post/10593Thu, 28 Oct 2004 05:15:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to nsx engine? on Thu, 28 Oct 2004 03:42:02 GMT]]>according to a couple of sites i've seen, the jdm h22 has only 205hp. so...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/10572https://fargostreet.com/post/10572Thu, 28 Oct 2004 03:42:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to nsx engine? on Wed, 27 Oct 2004 23:37:14 GMT]]>

seanjohn wrote:
What about a prelude would make it faster??? Weight...no, thats not it. Power, no....thats not it either! Straight line or twisties, the prelude would get it's ass absolutely beat. Preludes are overpriced, overweight, 15 second cars with the worst transmission Honda ever put in a car next to the 3 speed STD tranny.

right on the worst trannys ever but not on 15sec car i have heard of guys running mid 14s on just a h22 and some minor mods

ps.. if u have a RSX lets race

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/10523https://fargostreet.com/post/10523Wed, 27 Oct 2004 23:37:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to nsx engine? on Wed, 27 Oct 2004 23:34:58 GMT]]>

AcesHigh wrote:
RSX-S > Prelude VTEC....

Bullshit. Bring your RSX. Although the K20 is indeed technologically superior, H22A makes up in displacement. Yes there is understeer, but guess what. All FWD have some degree of understeer.

What about a prelude would make it faster??? Weight...no, thats not it. Power, no....thats not it either! Straight line or twisties, the prelude would get it's ass absolutely beat. Preludes are overpriced, overweight, 15 second cars with the worst transmission Honda ever put in a car next to the 3 speed STD tranny.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/10522https://fargostreet.com/post/10522Wed, 27 Oct 2004 23:34:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to nsx engine? on Tue, 26 Oct 2004 04:38:19 GMT]]>

out there wrote:
i thought the discussion was about stock vs stock?
how am i suppose to mine isn't stock?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/10164https://fargostreet.com/post/10164Tue, 26 Oct 2004 04:38:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to nsx engine? on Tue, 26 Oct 2004 03:23:00 GMT]]>i thought the discussion was about stock vs stock?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/10118https://fargostreet.com/post/10118Tue, 26 Oct 2004 03:23:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to nsx engine? on Tue, 26 Oct 2004 02:52:31 GMT]]>ur only prob. with the rsx type s is a lot of lag , its boost is good at about thirty. on but there is plenty of room for h22a built w/300 whp with out turbo

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/10113https://fargostreet.com/post/10113Tue, 26 Oct 2004 02:52:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to nsx engine? on Tue, 26 Oct 2004 00:08:15 GMT]]>my gf has a prelude s (f22 :(), and with nearly 200k on it, it still handles better than a lot of cars that i've driven

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/10104https://fargostreet.com/post/10104Tue, 26 Oct 2004 00:08:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to nsx engine? on Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:59:00 GMT]]>RSX-S > Prelude VTEC....

Bullshit. Bring your RSX. Although the K20 is indeed technologically superior, H22A makes up in displacement. Yes there is understeer, but guess what. All FWD have some degree of understeer.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/10008https://fargostreet.com/post/10008Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:59:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to nsx engine? on Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:42:50 GMT]]>RSX type S owns preludes from every angle. The only thing a prelude is good for is a donor car for the engine to stick into an EF.

And preludes handle like shit, noseheavy pigs.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/10005https://fargostreet.com/post/10005Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:42:50 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to nsx engine? on Tue, 19 Oct 2004 19:23:31 GMT]]>yah.. but still a swap from a 3.0 to a 3.2 (CL) your looking at like 8000-12000 for the swap... putting on in a rsx is just rediculous.. instead of wasting your money on that why dont you buy me ZEX or something.. 🙂

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/9389https://fargostreet.com/post/9389Tue, 19 Oct 2004 19:23:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to nsx engine? on Tue, 19 Oct 2004 02:21:38 GMT]]>RSX typeS > Prelude

In EVERY aspect

Its simple

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/9277https://fargostreet.com/post/9277Tue, 19 Oct 2004 02:21:38 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to nsx engine? on Mon, 18 Oct 2004 16:19:25 GMT]]>OH DUDE TELL ME WHERE YUOE FOUND THAT. should i look at SLS for some turbo charging customization. my friends point me in that direction

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/9150https://fargostreet.com/post/9150Mon, 18 Oct 2004 16:19:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to nsx engine? on Mon, 18 Oct 2004 05:03:40 GMT]]>Expecially looks... I really would like an RSX Type-S. I have heard of them putting down 300whp at 6psi on a certain turbo kit... cant remember which one.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/8990https://fargostreet.com/post/8990Mon, 18 Oct 2004 05:03:40 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to nsx engine? on Mon, 18 Oct 2004 04:39:57 GMT]]>the rsx type s will beat the prelude in every comp u put them in hands down.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/8970https://fargostreet.com/post/8970Mon, 18 Oct 2004 04:39:57 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to nsx engine? on Mon, 18 Oct 2004 04:25:33 GMT]]>

AcesHigh wrote:
Wow, that's crazy. I honestly think that they ranked the 911 Carrera way too low. I mean hell, which car won several Le Mans in a row... The lightness of a Prelude undoubtedly results in responsive steering, but the 911's do not outweigh the 2G Preludes. The rest of the cars they have on there (Esprit, Supra) are tanks that will obviously have the steering of one.

What a strange list of cars they picked. More suitable competition from that period would be: Lotus Elan, Mitsubishi Starion, Rx-7, Supercharged MR2... It's like putting a little thin guy against a room full of obese men and telling them to maneuver across an obstacle course.

The 2g prelude has a better weight distribution (50/50) that allows for the better handling.
And that road test was done in '84 with the base model prelude. For more reading on 2g ludes, go here http://www.preludepower.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=28519

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/8964https://fargostreet.com/post/8964Mon, 18 Oct 2004 04:25:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to nsx engine? on Mon, 18 Oct 2004 04:14:51 GMT]]>Wow, that's crazy. I honestly think that they ranked the 911 Carrera way too low. I mean hell, which car won several Le Mans in a row... The lightness of a Prelude undoubtedly results in responsive steering, but the 911's do not outweigh the 2G Preludes. The rest of the cars they have on there (Esprit, Supra) are tanks that will obviously have the steering of one.

What a strange list of cars they picked. More suitable competition from that period would be: Lotus Elan, Mitsubishi Starion, Rx-7, Supercharged MR2... It's like putting a little thin guy against a room full of obese men and telling them to maneuver across an obstacle course.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/8961https://fargostreet.com/post/8961Mon, 18 Oct 2004 04:14:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to nsx engine? on Mon, 18 Oct 2004 04:06:52 GMT]]>

AcesHigh wrote:
Yeah, you do have the slowest car on the street. About every fourth gen Prelude out there has an H22A, its nothing uncommon anymore.

you most not go out on the street very much i have 1 of 2 true jdm h22a in a prelude in fargo i know of a civic with one in it

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/8958https://fargostreet.com/post/8958Mon, 18 Oct 2004 04:06:52 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to nsx engine? on Mon, 18 Oct 2004 04:00:18 GMT]]>

KidSupreme wrote:
http://members.lycos.co.uk/secondgenlude/CD9-10.jpg
I was waiting for you to chime in.

So do I win $5 bucks then since the RSX runs a quicker 1/4?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/8955https://fargostreet.com/post/8955Mon, 18 Oct 2004 04:00:18 GMT