<![CDATA[Porsche Cayman S]]>Brian made a thread about the Cayman a long time ago, but these are newly published pictures. Based of off the Boxster, rear engine rear wheel drive. Have fun filling up windshield wiper fluid or engine oil, if you can find its engine.

legacy image
legacy image
legacy image
legacy image

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/5673/porsche-cayman-sRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 06:57:39 GMTThu, 16 Feb 2006 04:25:56 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Porsche Cayman S on Sun, 19 Feb 2006 20:04:36 GMT]]>Oh yeah, Red Cayman S sits outside of Valley imports, not in the showroom. it's pretty bad ass if I say so myself.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/93242https://fargostreet.com/post/93242Sun, 19 Feb 2006 20:04:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Porsche Cayman S on Sun, 19 Feb 2006 20:03:36 GMT]]>No one could fit in them then tony!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/93241https://fargostreet.com/post/93241Sun, 19 Feb 2006 20:03:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Porsche Cayman S on Sun, 19 Feb 2006 18:59:45 GMT]]>like a miata coupe would prolly handle better than a a regular miata convertible..

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/93235https://fargostreet.com/post/93235Sun, 19 Feb 2006 18:59:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Porsche Cayman S on Sun, 19 Feb 2006 18:57:08 GMT]]>

weshole wrote:
OH, REALLY?......

Generally speaking, I stand by my words....for example a convertible corvette doesn't handle as well as a hardtop. Cars specifically designed to be convertibles tend to do better than those that were "converted" into ragtops as a marketing technique. So, I'd say that yes the boxster was designed for drop top operation, but I'd be willing to bet that the Cayman can outperform it due to the added structural benefit of having a roof.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/93234https://fargostreet.com/post/93234Sun, 19 Feb 2006 18:57:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Porsche Cayman S on Sun, 19 Feb 2006 15:54:40 GMT]]>

tjamz wrote:
IDK, its hard to beat the handling characteristics of a car with a roof on it.

OH, REALLY?......

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/93227https://fargostreet.com/post/93227Sun, 19 Feb 2006 15:54:40 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Porsche Cayman S on Sun, 19 Feb 2006 05:19:48 GMT]]>

tjamz wrote:
IDK, its hard to beat the handling characteristics of a car with a roof on it.
Right on brother! the roof is were it's at!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/93216https://fargostreet.com/post/93216Sun, 19 Feb 2006 05:19:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Porsche Cayman S on Sun, 19 Feb 2006 05:04:07 GMT]]>I would buy a grey hound........

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/93214https://fargostreet.com/post/93214Sun, 19 Feb 2006 05:04:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Porsche Cayman S on Sun, 19 Feb 2006 04:46:54 GMT]]>IDK, its hard to beat the handling characteristics of a car with a roof on it.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/93213https://fargostreet.com/post/93213Sun, 19 Feb 2006 04:46:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Porsche Cayman S on Sun, 19 Feb 2006 04:11:53 GMT]]>I'd take a Boxster S... can't beat the convertible...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/93209https://fargostreet.com/post/93209Sun, 19 Feb 2006 04:11:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Porsche Cayman S on Sun, 19 Feb 2006 04:01:41 GMT]]>they are mid engine, you are correct.

http://www.porsche.com/usa/models/cayman/cayman-s/featuresandspecs/
http://www.porsche.com/usa/models/boxster/boxster-s/featuresandspecs/

for the $4000 difference between Boxter S ($54,700) and Cayman S ($58,900), I'd take the Cayman S.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/93208https://fargostreet.com/post/93208Sun, 19 Feb 2006 04:01:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Porsche Cayman S on Sat, 18 Feb 2006 16:08:16 GMT]]>i thought the cayman and boxster were mid-engine not rear engine, BIG difference.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/93176https://fargostreet.com/post/93176Sat, 18 Feb 2006 16:08:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Porsche Cayman S on Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:23:49 GMT]]>I had to get parts at velley imports last week and they have one inside, kinda cool but i would much sooner have the old body 993 turbo they have in the showroom just like off of bad boys(except its red).

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/93004https://fargostreet.com/post/93004Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:23:49 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Porsche Cayman S on Thu, 16 Feb 2006 04:50:57 GMT]]>

T ! N wrote:
I have seen it, whats your point?

i thought they were supposed to be like top secret photos or somethin...my bad

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/92956https://fargostreet.com/post/92956Thu, 16 Feb 2006 04:50:57 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Porsche Cayman S on Thu, 16 Feb 2006 04:43:01 GMT]]>

PSiedTSi wrote:
theres already been a topgear episode about it tin...

I have seen it, whats your point?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/92950https://fargostreet.com/post/92950Thu, 16 Feb 2006 04:43:01 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Porsche Cayman S on Thu, 16 Feb 2006 04:42:09 GMT]]>and if i remember right they hated that car.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/92949https://fargostreet.com/post/92949Thu, 16 Feb 2006 04:42:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Porsche Cayman S on Thu, 16 Feb 2006 04:41:23 GMT]]>996 turbo.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/92947https://fargostreet.com/post/92947Thu, 16 Feb 2006 04:41:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Porsche Cayman S on Thu, 16 Feb 2006 04:34:47 GMT]]>theres already been a topgear episode about it tin...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/92942https://fargostreet.com/post/92942Thu, 16 Feb 2006 04:34:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Porsche Cayman S on Thu, 16 Feb 2006 04:29:04 GMT]]>I'd rather have a Boxster or a Carrera...

Esp for what it costs and the premium it's demanding

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/92940https://fargostreet.com/post/92940Thu, 16 Feb 2006 04:29:04 GMT